The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chemical Speciation of Chromium in Water: A Review
Abstract
The investigation of a groundwater resource impacted with Cr(VI) requires analysis of groundwater for Cr(VI) and total Cr. Most notably, Cr(III) is considered to be a trace element essential for the proper functioning of living organisms, whereas Cr(VI) may exert toxic effects on biological systems. The nature and behavior of various Cr forms found in wastewater can be quite different from those present in natural waters because of altered physicochemical conditions of the eluents originating from various industrial sources. The chromium content in surface waters is usually at the low μgL−1 level, typically between 0.3 and 6 μgL−1. Speciation of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) has been a longstanding analytical challenge. The selective determination of Cr(VI) is of particular importance because of its toxicity. Due to the importance of Cr(III) and Cr(VI), the accurate and sensitive determinations of these ions are the important part of the analytical chemistry. Chromium speciation is very important in different branches of natural sciences. Therefore, total chromium measurements alone cannot determine the actual environmental impact. This requires speciation techniques with sufficient selectivity and high sensitivity. Speciation of trace levels of chromium in water sample requires high-capacity separation and high sensitivity detection. The authors present a review of presently available analytical possibilities of chromium speciation investigations in water samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Determination of organic compounds in water using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction
Rezaee, M., Assadi, Y., Milani Hosseini, M.-R., Aghaee, E., Ahmadi, F., & Berijani, S. (2006) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2006.03.007 · Cited by 3,402 · cited 2×
“Recently, a new mode of liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) named dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) which is based on ternary component solvent system, such as CPE and homogeneous liquid–liquid extraction (HLLE), as high performance, rapid and inexpensive microextraction method has been proposed ( Rezae…”
BackgroundQuina, F. H., & Hinze, W. L. (1999) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie980389n · Cited by 424
Cited by
Velusamy, S., Roy, A., Sundaram, S., & Kumar Mallick, T. (2021) · The Chemical Record · doi:10.1002/tcr.202000153 · Cited by 908
A critical review on bioremediation technologies for Cr(VI)-contaminated soils and wastewater
Xia, S., Song, Z., Jeyakumar, P., Shaheen, S. M., Rinklebe, J., Ok, Y. S., Bolan, N., & Wang, H. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2018.1564526 · Cited by 490
Ao, M., Chen, X., Deng, T., Sun, S., Tang, Y., Morel, J. L., Qiu, R., & Wang, S. (2022) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127233 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Rakhunde, R., Deshpande, L., & Juneja, H. D.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 776-810
- ISSN
- 1064-3389 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-6537
- OpenAlex
- W2167119427
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemical Speciation of Chromium in Water: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10643389.2010.534029
- The paper
- Rakhunde, R., Deshpande, L., & Juneja, H. D. (2012). Chemical Speciation of Chromium in Water: A Review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2010.534029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.