The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanopesticides: State of Knowledge, Environmental Fate, and Exposure Modeling
Abstract
Published literature has been reviewed in order to (a) explore the (potential) applications of nanotechnology in pesticide formulation, (b) identify possible impacts on environmental fate, and (c) analyze the suitability of current exposure assessment procedures to account for the novel properties of nanopesticides within the EU regulatory context. The term nanopesticide covers a wide variety of products and cannot be considered to represent a single category. Many nanoformulations combine several surfactants, polymers, and metal nanoparticles in the nanometer size range. The aims of nanoformulations are generally common to other pesticide formulations, these being to increase the apparent solubility of poorly soluble active ingredients, to release the active ingredient in a slow/targeted manner and/or to protect against premature degradation. Nanoformulations are thus expected to (a) have significant impacts on the fate of active ingredients and/or (b) introduce new ingredients for which the environmental fate is still poorly understood (e.g., nanosilver). Therefore, it seems that adaptations of current exposure assessment approaches will be necessary, at least for some nanopesticides. The present analysis provides a useful framework to identify priorities for future research in order to achieve more robust risk assessments of nanopesticides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
von der Kammer, F., Ferguson, P. L., Holden, P. A., Masion, A., Rogers, K. R., Klaine, S. J., Koelmans, A. A., Horne, N., & Unrine, J. M. (2012) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.723 · Cited by 448
Cited by
Chitosan Effects on Plant Systems
Malerba, M., & Cerana, R. (2016) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms17070996 · Cited by 528
Green Pesticides: Essential Oils as Biopesticides in Insect-pest Management
Mossa, A.-T. H. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.3923/jest.2016.354.378 · Cited by 454
Asadishad, B., Chahal, S., Akbari, A., Cianciarelli, V., Azodi, M., Ghoshal, S., & Tufenkji, N. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b05389 · Cited by 319
Kim, D., Kadam, A., Shinde, S., Saratale, R. G., Patra, J., & Ghodake, G. (2018) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.8749 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Kah, M., Beulke, S., Tiede, K., & Hofmann, T.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1823-1867
- ISSN
- 1064-3389 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-6537
- OpenAlex
- W1995668900
- Cited by
- 672
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanopesticides: State of Knowledge, Environmental Fate, and Exposure Modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10643389.2012.671750
- The paper
- Kah, M., Beulke, S., Tiede, K., & Hofmann, T. (2013). Nanopesticides: State of Knowledge, Environmental Fate, and Exposure Modeling. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2012.671750
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.