The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Municipal Solid Waste Generation, Composition, and Management: The World Scenario
Open accessAbstract
The original version of this article was incorrectly published online and in print, Volume 42, Issue 15, pages 1509-1630. The Acknowledgment in the original paper was not updated as the author sugg...
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The quality of the data suffers from inconsistencies in the definition of MSW generation across countries52.”
From Potential for future reductions of global GHG and air pollutants from circular waste management systems (2022) · cites this paper as [52]
In the citing paper
“This approach is likely to be an improved version of the one-half rural-urban waste generation ratio used by some studies4,52 because it captures the differences between regions”
From Potential for future reductions of global GHG and air pollutants from circular waste management systems (2022) · cites this paper as [52]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gómez-Sanabria, A., Kiesewetter, G., Klimont, Z., Schoepp, W., & Haberl, H. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27624-7 · Cited by 306
Karimi, M., Shirzad, M., Silva, J. A. C., & Rodrigues, A. E. (2022) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2022.101890 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Karak, T., Bhagat, R. M., & Bhattacharyya, P.
- Affiliations
- Tea Research Association (IN)
- University of Wyoming (US)
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 215-215
- ISSN
- 1064-3389 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-6537
- OpenAlex
- W4230153396
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation
- National Tea Research Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
- Keywords
- municipal solid waste, waste generation, waste composition, waste management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
