The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Critical Assessment of Chromium in the Environment
Abstract
This article reviews the emissions, environmental fate and transport, analytical chemistry, uptake and metabolism, toxicology, and human epidemiology of chromium. Chromium is unique among regulated toxic elements in the environment in that different species of chromium, specifically chromium (III) and chromium (VI), are regulated in different ways, in contrast to other toxic elements where the oxidation state is not distinguished. In both industrial and environmental situations chromium (III) and chromium (VI) can inter-convert, with reduction of chromium (VI) to chromium (III) generally being favored in most environmental situations. Chromium released into the air, water, and soil can be transported among the various environmental media through various intermedia transport processes. Once in the environment, chromium can be taken up by human and other ecological receptors. Chromium (III) is generally absorbed through cell membranes albeit to a significantly lesser degree than chromium (VI). Because most of the biosphere is reducing for chromium (VI) and chromium (III) is relatively immobile, there is little bioconcentration or biomagnification of chromium (VI). Chromium appears to be a nutrient for at least some plants and animals, including humans, although chromium (VI) species have been reported to be toxic to bacteria, plants, and animals. Human toxicity includes lung cancer, liver, kidney and gastric damage, and epidermal irritation and sensiti-zation. However, it is noted that medical, toxicological, and epidemiological evidence suggests that not all compounds containing chromium (VI) species (e.g., chromate salts) are carcinogenic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kinetics of chromium(III) oxidation to chromium(VI) by reaction with manganese dioxide
Eary, L. E., & Rai, D. (1987) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es00165a005 · Cited by 496
Wang, P.-C., Mori, T., Komori, K., Sasatsu, M., Toda, K., & Ohtake, H. (1989) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.55.7.1665-1669.1989 · Cited by 323
Cited by
Activated carbons and low cost adsorbents for remediation of tri- and hexavalent chromium from water
Mohan, D., & Pittman Jr., C. U. (2006) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.060 · Cited by 1,855
Sridhara Chary, N., Kamala, C. T., & Samuel Suman Raj, D. (2008) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.04.013 · Cited by 914
Removal of hexavalent chromium-contaminated water and wastewater: A review
Owlad, M., Aroua, M. K., Daud, W. A. W., & Baroutian, S. (2009) · Water, Air, and Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-008-9893-7 · Cited by 820
Prasad, S., Yadav, K. K., Kumar, S., Gupta, N., Cabral-Pinto, M. M. S., Rezania, S., Radwan, N., & Alam, J. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112174 · Cited by 744
Chromium as an Environmental Pollutant: Insights on Induced Plant Toxicity
Oliveira, H. (2012) · Journal of Botany · doi:10.1155/2012/375843 · Cited by 587
Metadata
- Authors
- Kimbrough, D. E., Cohen, Y., Winer, A. M., Creelman, L., & Mabuni, C.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-46
- ISSN
- 1064-3389 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-6537
- OpenAlex
- W2035165638
- Cited by
- 875
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Critical Assessment of Chromium in the Environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10643389991259164
- The paper
- Kimbrough, D. E., Cohen, Y., Winer, A. M., Creelman, L., & Mabuni, C. (1999). A Critical Assessment of Chromium in the Environment. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389991259164
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.