Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 875

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Critical Assessment of Chromium in the Environment

Kimbrough, David Eugene, Cohen, Yoram, Winer, Arthur M., Creelman, Lynn, Mabuni, Clayton·1999·Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology

Abstract

This article reviews the emissions, environmental fate and transport, analytical chemistry, uptake and metabolism, toxicology, and human epidemiology of chromium. Chromium is unique among regulated toxic elements in the environment in that different species of chromium, specifically chromium (III) and chromium (VI), are regulated in different ways, in contrast to other toxic elements where the oxidation state is not distinguished. In both industrial and environmental situations chromium (III) and chromium (VI) can inter-convert, with reduction of chromium (VI) to chromium (III) generally being favored in most environmental situations. Chromium released into the air, water, and soil can be transported among the various environmental media through various intermedia transport processes. Once in the environment, chromium can be taken up by human and other ecological receptors. Chromium (III) is generally absorbed through cell membranes albeit to a significantly lesser degree than chromium (VI). Because most of the biosphere is reducing for chromium (VI) and chromium (III) is relatively immobile, there is little bioconcentration or biomagnification of chromium (VI). Chromium appears to be a nutrient for at least some plants and animals, including humans, although chromium (VI) species have been reported to be toxic to bacteria, plants, and animals. Human toxicity includes lung cancer, liver, kidney and gastric damage, and epidermal irritation and sensiti-zation. However, it is noted that medical, toxicological, and epidemiological evidence suggests that not all compounds containing chromium (VI) species (e.g., chromate salts) are carcinogenic.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10643389991259164

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 875

Metadata

Authors
Kimbrough, D. E., Cohen, Y., Winer, A. M., Creelman, L., & Mabuni, C.
Venue
Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
Published
1999-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
1-46
ISSN
  • 1064-3389 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-6537
OpenAlex
W2035165638
Cited by
875
References
2
FWCI
6.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Critical Assessment of Chromium in the Environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10643389991259164
The paper
Kimbrough, D. E., Cohen, Y., Winer, A. M., Creelman, L., & Mabuni, C. (1999). A Critical Assessment of Chromium in the Environment. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389991259164

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.