Walking the Tightrope: Parenting Advice in Essence Magazine
Abstract
Analysis of popular parenting advice in the form of magazines provides insight into culturally held views of what it means to be a “good” parent. Although research has examined parenting advice in popular magazines, the target readership has been largely comprised of White, middle-class mothers. The result has been a dearth of research on the social construction of parenthood as portrayed to a primarily African American readership. The purpose of this study was to describe and analyze the content and themes provided to African American parents through the longest consistently published magazine for African American women—Essence. Parenting articles appearing in Essence from 1996 to 2006 were content analyzed. Among the topics covered was the need to protect children from a racist social environment. A second topic concerned health issues unique to African American children. An authoritative parenting style was advocated and the use of physical punishment was explicitly rejected. Results found that responsibility for parenting rests primarily with African American women. In addition, parents were tasked with the responsibility to provide opportunities for their child to experience racial pride.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Limited scholarship exists describing dimensions media assume covering the political and everyday life of race, identity, and social movements within a single text.
“Limited scholarship exists describing dimensions media assume covering the political and everyday life of race, identity, and social movements within a single text; however, other scholars have addressed these topics discretely in other research studies about protests, horoscopes, and parenting (Keller, 2020;Prusank & Duran, 2014;Tandoc Jr. & Ferrucci, 2014;Woodward & Mastin, 2005).”
From The memeification of "woke culture": a multimodal critical discourse analysis of its articulation in Essence; O, The Oprah Magazine; and Teen Vogue (2023) · cites this paper as Prusank & Duran, 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lenoir, L. D. (2023) · University of Missouri Dissertation · doi:10.32469/10355/94284 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Tait, G. B., Daniels, G. L., & Bland, D. (2026) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10776990251393260
- Authors
- PRUSANK, D. T., & DURAN, R. L.
- Affiliations
- Westfield State University (US)
- University of Hartford (US)
- Corresponding author
- PRUSANK, DIANE T.
- Venue
- Howard Journal of Communications
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77-97
- ISSN
- 1064-6175 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-4649
- OpenAlex
- W1995084245
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Howard Journal of Communications (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Linnéuniversitetet
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Keywords
- parenting advice, African American parents, African American women, racial pride, racism, authoritative parenting, corporal punishment, child health, social construction of parenthood
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review