The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Compost Tea: Principles and Prospects For Plant Disease Control
Abstract
An increasing body of experimental evidence indicates that plant disease can be suppressed by treating plant surfaces with a variety of water-based compost preparations, referred to in the literature as watery fermented compost extracts or compost teas. The terms nonaerated compost teas (NCT) and aerated compost teas (ACT) are used in this review to refer to the common production methods that diverge in the intent to actively aerate. Very little data directly compares the efficacy of NCT and ACT for plant disease suppression. A variety of foliar plant pathogens and/or diseases have been suppressed by applications of NCT while few controlled studies have examined ACT. For some diseases the level of control would be considered inadequate for conventional agriculture; organic producers with limited control options consider partial disease control to be an important improvement. For both compost tea production methods, decisions that influence pathogen suppression include choice of compost feedstocks, compost age, water ratio, fermentation time, added nutrients, temperature and pH. Application technology choices include the dilution ratio, application equipment, timing, rates, spray adjuncts and adding specific microbial antagonists. Increased understanding of compost tea microbiology and the survival and interactions of microbes on plants surfaces should make it possible to modify compost tea production practices and application technology to optimize delivery of a microflora with multiple modes of pathogen suppression. Innovative growers and practitioners are leading the development of new compost tea production methods and uses, generating many potential research opportunities. The use of compost tea as part of an integrated plant health management strategy will require much additional whole systems research by a cohesive team of farmers and experts in composting, plant pathology, phyllosphere biology, molecular microbial ecology, fermentation science, plant physiology, plant breeding, soil science, and horticulture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Manual of Clinical Microbiology.
(1980) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-93-6-939_2 · Cited by 14,411
The nature and practice of biological control of plant pathogens
Cook, R., & Baker, K. F. (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,265
The nature and practice of biological control of plant pathogens
Jeffries, P. (1984) · Physiological Plant Pathology · doi:10.1016/0048-4059(84)90064-x · Cited by 931
MANUAL OF INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Demain, A. L., & DAVIES, J. E. (1999) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 792
Manual of Clinical Microbiology.
Neu, H. C. (1970) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1970.00310120141029 · Cited by 506
Duffy, B. K., & Défago, G. (1999) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.65.6.2429-2438.1999 · Cited by 486
Biological Control in the Phyllosphere
Andrews, J. H. (1992) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.py.30.090192.003131 · Cited by 355
Suppression of Plant Diseases by Composts
Hoitink, H. A. J., Stone, A. G., & Grebus, M. E. (1996) · The Science of Composting · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1569-5_35 · Cited by 341
Compost and Compost Water Extract-Induced Systemic Acquired Resistance in Cucumber and Arabidopsis
Zhang, W., Han, D. Y., Dick, W. A., Davis, K. R., & Hoitink, H. A. J. (1998) · Phytopathology® · doi:10.1094/phyto.1998.88.5.450 · Cited by 299
Potential for Biological Control of Plant Diseases on the Phylloplane
Blakeman, J. P., & Fokkema, N. J. (1982) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.py.20.090182.001123 · Cited by 279
Cited by
Impact of agricultural inputs on soil organisms - a review
Bünemann, E. K., Schwenke, G. D., & Van Zwieten, L. (2006) · Soil Research · doi:10.1071/sr05125 · Cited by 521
Manure management and soil biodiversity: Towards more sustainable food systems in the EU
Köninger, J., Lugato, E., Panagos, P., Kochupillai, M., Orgiazzi, A., & Briones, M. J. I. (2021) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103251 · Cited by 319
Soil Health Paradigms and Implications for Disease Management
Larkin, R. P. (2015) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-080614-120357 · Cited by 293
Ronga, D., Caradonia, F., Setti, L., Hagassou, D., Giaretta Azevedo, C. V., Milc, J., Pedrazzi, S., Allesina, G., Arru, L., & Francia, E. (2019) · Acta Horticulturae · doi:10.17660/actahortic.2019.1233.19 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Scheuerell, S., & Mahaffee, W.
- Venue
- Compost Science & Utilization
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 313-338
- ISSN
- 1065-657X (ISSN-L)
- 2326-2397
- OpenAlex
- W2073259373
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 6.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Compost Tea: Principles and Prospects For Plant Disease Control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1065657x.2002.10702095
- The paper
- Scheuerell, S., & Mahaffee, W. (2002). Compost Tea: Principles and Prospects For Plant Disease Control. Compost Science & Utilization. https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657x.2002.10702095
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.