The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GENDER DIFFERENCES AND THE ONLINE CLASSROOM: MALE AND FEMALE COLLEGE STUDENTS EVALUATE THEIR EXPERIENCES
Abstract
There has been considerable scholarly interest in issues related to gender and the online classroom. Some evidence suggests that male and female college students experience the online environment differently. The study reported here was designed to gather information regarding this matter. The Connecticut Distance Learning Consortium (CTDLC) included two open-ended questions on their CT s standard course evaluation form for the fall 2000 semester. These questions invited students to comment on their experiences as learners in the online classroom in as much length and detail as they wished. This report is based on an analysis of the 195 responses to these two questions. Significant differences were found between the way male and female students identified the strengths and weaknesses of the online environment on a range of questions regarding flexibility, face-to-face interaction, shy and quiet students, self-discipline, and self-motivation. The data provide compelling evidence that online courses are of great value to nontraditional students, particularly female adult learners with children or family responsibilities. Because this is a primary demographic profile for community colleges, these data should be of special interest to community faculty and administrators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.10.1123 · Cited by 2,630
Cited by
Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2014) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2014.11777343 · Cited by 568
Adaptability to Online Learning: Differences Across Types of Students and Academic Subject Areas
(2013) · Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University) · doi:10.7916/d82f7m24 · Cited by 241
Student Characteristics That Predict Persistence in Community College Online Courses
Harrell, I. L., & Bower, B. L. (2011) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1080/08923647.2011.590107 · Cited by 103
Quality of e-learners’ time and learning performance beyond quantitative time-on-task
Romero, M., & Barberà, E. (2011) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v12i5.999 · Cited by 96
Cultural ways of constructing knowledge: the role of identities in online group discussions
Öztok, M. (2016) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-016-9233-7 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Sullivan, P.
- Venue
- Community College Journal of Research and Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 805-818
- ISSN
- 1066-8926 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0413
- OpenAlex
- W2059557576
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GENDER DIFFERENCES AND THE ONLINE CLASSROOM: MALE AND FEMALE COLLEGE STUDENTS EVALUATE THEIR EXPERIENCES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/106689201753235930
- The paper
- Sullivan, P. (2001). GENDER DIFFERENCES AND THE ONLINE CLASSROOM: MALE AND FEMALE COLLEGE STUDENTS EVALUATE THEIR EXPERIENCES. Community College Journal of Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/106689201753235930
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.