The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stress and Coping Strategies Among Community College Students
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to determine the degree of stress perceived by students at two community colleges in southern Illinois. The Perceived Stress Scale was used to gather data from 212 students enrolled in regularly scheduled psychology classes. Of the students, 75% were in a moderate stress category; 12% in a high stress category, and 13% in a low stress category. Women students were more stressed than men; there were no statistically significant differences between traditional and nontraditional students. The most often used activities to cope with stress included talking to family and friends, leisure activities, and exercising. Less desirable coping strategies were drinking alcohol, smoking, and using illegal drugs. Suggestions for community college personnel to use in assisting students cope with stress are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Global Measure of Perceived Stress
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136404 · Cited by 32,807
Cited by
Huberty, J., Green, J., Glissmann, C., Larkey, L., Puzia, M., & Lee, C. (2019) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/14273 · Cited by 488
Ryan, M. L., Shochet, I. M., & Stallman, H. M. (2010) · Advances in Mental Health · doi:10.5172/jamh.9.1.73 · Cited by 252
Comparing Mental Health Issues Among Undergraduate and Graduate Students
Wyatt, T., & Oswalt, S. B. (2013) · American Journal of Health Education · doi:10.1080/19325037.2013.764248 · Cited by 232
Räsänen, P., Lappalainen, P., Muotka, J., Tolvanen, A., & Lappalainen, R. (2016) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2016.01.001 · Cited by 221
Explaining the Paradox: How Pro-Environmental Behaviour can both Thwart and Foster Well-Being
Venhoeven, L., Bolderdijk, J., & Steg, L. (2013) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su5041372 · Cited by 221
Evaluation of an mHealth App (DeStressify) on University Students’ Mental Health: Pilot Trial
Lee, R. A., & Jung, M. E. (2018) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/mental.8324 · Cited by 138
Coping profiles, perceived stress and health-related behaviors: A cluster analysis approach
Doron, J., Trouillet, R., Maneveau, A., Neveu, D., & Ninot, G. (2015) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/dau090 · Cited by 140
Ponzo, S., Morelli, D., Kawadler, J. M., Hemmings, N. R., Bird, G., & Plans, D. (2020) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/17767 · Cited by 100
Thomas, S. J., Caputi, P., & Wilson, C. J. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22022 · Cited by 71
Guilty Pleasure No More: The Relative Importance of Media Use for Coping With Stress
Nabi, R. L., Pérez Torres, D., & Prestin, A. (2017) · Journal of Media Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000223 · Cited by 57
Students perceived stress in academic programs: Consequences for its management
Neveu, D., Doron, J., Visier, L., Boiché, J., Trouillet, R., Dujols, P., & Ninot, G. (2012) · Revue d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique · doi:10.1016/j.respe.2012.01.008 · Cited by 47
Program evaluation of a student-led peer support service at a Canadian university
Suresh, R., Karkossa, Z., Richard, J., & Karia, M. (2021) · International Journal of Mental Health Systems · doi:10.1186/s13033-021-00479-7 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Pierceall, E. A., & Keim, M. C.
- Venue
- Community College Journal of Research and Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-09-06
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 703-712
- ISSN
- 1066-8926 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0413
- OpenAlex
- W1999726930
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
