Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 709

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing Mediation in Dyadic Data Using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model

Ledermann, Thomas, Macho, Siegfried, Kenny, David A.·2011·Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal

Abstract

The assessment of mediation in dyadic data is an important issue if researchers are to test process models. Using an extended version of the actor–partner interdependence model the estimation and testing of mediation is complex, especially when dyad members are distinguishable (e.g., heterosexual couples). We show how the complexity of the model can be reduced by assuming specific dyadic patterns. Using structural equation modeling, we demonstrate how specific mediating effects and contrasts among effects can be tested by phantom models that permit point and bootstrap interval estimates. We illustrate the assessment of mediation and the strategies to simplify the model using data from heterosexual couples.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10705511.2011.607099

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Arbuckle , J. L. 1995–2009 . Amos 18 user's guide. , Chicago, IL : SPSS .
  2. 10.1037/0033-2909.118.3.430 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.3.430 · Paper page
  3. Jöreskog , K. G. and Sörbom , D. 2006 . LISREL 8.8 for Windows. , Lincolnwood, IL : Scientific Software International .
  4. 10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.185 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.185 · Paper page
  5. Muthén , L. K. and Muthén , B. O. 1998–2010 . Mplus user's guide, , 6th ed. , Los Angeles, CA : Muthén & Muthén .
  6. Olsen , D. H. , Fournier , D. G. and Druckman , J. M. 1983 . PREPARE/ENRICH counselor's manual. , Minneapolis, MN : PREPARE/ENRICH, Inc .
  7. 10.1080/10705510701303798 · doi:10.1080/10705510701303798

Cited by

See all 709

Metadata

Authors
Ledermann, T., Macho, S., & Kenny, D. A.
Venue
Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
Published
2011-10-05
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
595-612
ISSN
  • 1070-5511 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-8007
OpenAlex
W2059242307
Cited by
709
References
41
FWCI
12.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing Mediation in Dyadic Data Using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10705511.2011.607099
The paper
Ledermann, T., Macho, S., & Kenny, D. A. (2011). Assessing Mediation in Dyadic Data Using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.607099

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.