Cited by 97Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMedia and Digital CommunicationChild Development and Digital Technology

Explicating problematic social network sites use: A review of concepts, theoretical frameworks, and future directions for communication theorizing

Open access
Lee, Edmund W J, Ho, Shirley S, Lwin, May O·2017·New Media & Society

Abstract

The prevalence of social network sites (SNSs) has sparked a growing interest in understanding the development of problematic SNSs use among adolescents. Yet, this nascent area of research is marked by some deficiencies in existing theoretical paradigms. This article seeks to review the state of research in problematic SNSs use—broadly with a specific focus on adolescents—and identify key areas of research for future scholarly work. First, we summarize the historical and recent developments of media addiction and problematic SNSs use research. Second, we discuss the theoretical perspectives that contribute to our understanding of the problematic SNSs use phenomenon and identify the weaknesses of these frameworks. Third, we propose that communication scholars should strive for theoretical integration and examine the impact of microsystem (e.g. parents and peers) and macrosystem (e.g. surveillance culture) on the development of problematic SNSs among adolescents. Directions for future theoretical and methodological approaches are suggested.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1461444816671891

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is not clear how various kinds of social media behaviours articulate with general measures of social media addiction.

    “it is not clear how these various kinds of behaviours articulate with general measures of SMA (Lee et al., 2017; Carbonell & Panova, 2017).”

    From A mixed-methods study of problematic social media use, attention dysregulation, and social media use motives (2023) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2017

    The ‘Challenges to Research in Problematic SNSs Use’ section (p. 5) identifies confusion about what problematic use means, and ‘Implications for Future Communication Theorizing’ (p. 22) distinguishes surveillance, identity construction, and problematic-use networks. Neither passage addresses how particular social-media behaviours relate to general addiction measures. Searches for specific behaviours, measurement, and scales did not find that point in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 102 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Santrock JW (2008) Adolescence, New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
  2. Santrock JW (2007) Child development, New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
  3. Santrock JW (2009) Life-span development 12th ed., New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, E. W. J., Ho, S. S., & Lwin, M. O.
Affiliations
Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Corresponding author
Lee, Edmund W J
Venue
New Media & Society
Published
2016-10-06
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
308-326
ISSN
  • 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7315
OpenAlex
W2529278306
Cited by
97
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
13.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New Media & Society (publishedVersion)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
adolescents, media addiction, theoretical framework, surveillance cultures, parental influence, peer influence, communication theory, social media use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review