Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 168

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Revealing the competence of aphasic adults through conversation: A challenge to health professionals

Kagan, Aura·1995·Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Abstract

The idea that aphasia masks competence normally revealed through conversation forms the basis for a conceptual model thatextends the traditional definition and scope of practice in this field. The model focuses on the long-term, psychosocial consequences of reduced communicative access to social and community life, including reduced access to the service of health professionals. Intervention focuses on training conversation partners (including health professionals) to acqu i re ski I Is that enable the com petence of aphasic adults to be acknowledged and revealed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10749357.1995.11754051

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 168

Metadata

Authors
Kagan, A.
Venue
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Published
1995-03
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
15-28
ISSN
  • 1074-9357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-5119
OpenAlex
W2514594332
Cited by
168
References
0
FWCI
16.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revealing the competence of aphasic adults through conversation: A challenge to health professionals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10749357.1995.11754051
The paper
Kagan, A. (1995). Revealing the competence of aphasic adults through conversation: A challenge to health professionals. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.1995.11754051

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.