The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Review Article : Methods for Fault Detection, Diagnostics, and Prognostics for Building Systems—A Review, Part I
Abstract
Part II of this article will be published in Volume 11, Number 2, April 2005. Poorly maintained, degraded, and improperly controlled equipment wastes an estimated 15% to 30% of energy used in commercial buildings. Much of this waste could be prevented with widespread adoption of automated condition-based maintenance. Automated fault detection and diagnostics (FDD) along with prognostics provide a cornerstone for condition-based maintenance of engineered systems. Although FDD has been an active area of research in other fields for more than a decade, applications for heating, ventilating, air conditioning, and refrigeration (HVAC&R) and other building systems have lagged those in other industries. Nonetheless, over the last decade there has been considerable research and development targeted toward developing FDD methods for HVAC&R equipment. Despite this research, there are still only a handful of FDD tools that are deployed in the field. This paper is the first of a two-part review of methods for automated FDD and prognostics whose intent is to increase awareness of the HVAC&R research and development community to the body of FDD and prognostics developments in other fields as well as advancements in the field of HVAC&R. This first part of the review focuses on generic FDD and prognostics, providing a framework for categorizing methods, describing them, and identifying their primary strengths and weaknesses. The second paper in this review, to be published in the April 2005 International Journal of HVAC&R Research, will address research and applications specific to the fields of HVAC&R
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gao, Z., Cecati, C., & Ding, S. X. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2015.2417501 · Cited by 3,135
Zhao, Y., Li, T., Zhang, X., & Zhang, C. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.021 · Cited by 594
Leveraging the Capabilities of Industry 4.0 for Improving Energy Efficiency in Smart Factories
Mohamed, N., Al-Jaroodi, J., & Lazarova-Molnar, S. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2897045 · Cited by 168
Wang, Z., Wang, Z., He, S., Gu, X., & Yan, Z. F. (2017) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.130 · Cited by 138
Bellanco, I., Fuentes, E., Vallès, M., & Salom, J. (2021) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102254 · Cited by 84
Methodologies in power systems fault detection and diagnosis
Aleem, S. A., Shahid, N., & Naqvi, I. H. (2015) · Energy Systems · doi:10.1007/s12667-014-0129-1 · Cited by 83
Survey on Models and Techniques for Root-Cause Analysis
Solé, M., Muntés-Mulero, V., Rana, A. I., & Estrada, G. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1701.08546 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Katipamula, S., & Brambley, M. R.
- Venue
- HVAC&R Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-25
- ISSN
- 1078-9669 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-5587
- OpenAlex
- W2089662726
- Cited by
- 936
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.