Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 343

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Critical Review of Procedures and Approaches Used for Assessing Pollution-Induced Community Tolerance (PICT) in Biotic Communities

Blanck, Hans·2002·Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal

Abstract

Pollution-induced community tolerance (PICT) is used for the detection of minor effects of toxicants in biotic communities. Organisms survive in toxic environments only if they are tolerant to the chemicals present in their habitat. In the selection phase, toxicants hinder the success of sensitive individuals and species and replace them by more tolerant ones. The resulting increase in community tolerance is quantified in the detection phase by short-term toxicity tests. In this way PICT can establish causal linkages between contaminants and effects. An increase in community tolerance compared to the baseline tolerance at reference sites suggests that the community has been adversely affected by toxicants. PICT has been used in aquatic and terrestrial environments with communities of periphyton, phytoplankton, bacteria, nematodes and insects. A variety of methods have been used for quantification of community tolerance including photosynthesis, sulfolipid synthesis, respiration, thymidine and leucine incorporation, survival, and substrate utilisation patterns. PICT has been observed for copper, zinc, nickel, mercury, cadmium, arsenate, monomethylarsonic acid, diuron, tributyl tin, 4,5,6-trichloroguaiacol, irgarol 1051, seanine 211, atrazine, and trinitrotoluene. It is necessary to validate PICT, at least by showing that it is related to the preexposure concentration of the toxicants and that it is coupled to a toxicant-induced succession (TIS) in the community. Care must also be taken to ascertain that PICT interpretation is not confounded by co-tolerance or bioavailability differences. Co-tolerance patterns, which are indicative of the specificity of PICT, have only been investigated for arsenate, diuron and a few metals. For the further improvement of PICT methodology special attention should be given to co-tolerance patterns and development of new integrating short-term tests for quantification of tolerance. It is also important to broaden the scope of organisms and toxicants used. Properly validated, PICT is a powerful tool for detection of community effects and its use in monitoring and site-specific risk assessment should be encouraged.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1080-700291905792

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 343

Metadata

Authors
Blanck, H.
Venue
Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal
Published
2002-07
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
1003-1034
ISSN
  • 1080-7039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7860
OpenAlex
W2083295887
Cited by
343
References
0
FWCI
6.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Critical Review of Procedures and Approaches Used for Assessing Pollution-Induced Community Tolerance (PICT) in Biotic Communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1080-700291905792
The paper
Blanck, H. (2002). A Critical Review of Procedures and Approaches Used for Assessing Pollution-Induced Community Tolerance (PICT) in Biotic Communities. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/1080-700291905792

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.