Cited by 342Obesity and Health PracticesMedia Influence and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Obesity Stigma in Online News: A Visual Content Analysis

Heuer, Chelsea A., McClure, Kimberly J., Puhl, Rebecca M.·2011·Journal of Health Communication

Abstract

This study conducted a content analysis to examine the types of images that accompany online news stories about obesity and to determine how obese people are portrayed in news photographs. Images were selected from news articles about obesity obtained from 5 major news Web sites, during a 2-week period in September of 2009. Images accompanying news stories about obesity (N = 549) were systematically coded. Of 441 individuals identified in news photographs, 65% were overweight/obese and 27% were nonoverweight. Overall, 72% of images that depicted an overweight or obese person were portrayed in a negative, stigmatizing manner. Overweight/obese individuals were significantly more likely to have their heads cut out of the photos, to be portrayed showing only their abdomens or lower bodies, and to be shown eating or drinking than were nonoverweight individuals. Overweight/obese individuals were significantly less likely to be shown fully clothed, wearing professional clothing, or exercising than were nonoverweight individuals. Obese individuals are frequently stigmatized in online news photographs; this phenomenon has important implications for public perceptions of obese persons and may reinforce pervasive prejudice and discrimination.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10810730.2011.561915

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The media is a pervasive source of weight bias and can reinforce stigma through inaccurate framing of obesity and inappropriate images, language, and terminology that attribute obesity entirely to personal responsibility.

    “Evidence suggests that the media is a pervasive source of weight bias and can reinforce stigma through the use of inaccurate framing of obesity and inappropriate images, language, and terminology that attribute obesity entirely to personal responsibility15.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803105 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2007.09.006 · DOI
  3. 2010, The Associated Press statement of news values and principles
  4. 10.1007/s11133-006-9010-4 · DOI
  5. Bonfiglioli M. F., 2007, Medical Journal of Australia, 187, 442, 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01354.x · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s12160-009-9109-4 · DOI
  7. Cooper C., 2007, Headless fatties
  8. Crandall C. S., 2005, Weight bias: Nature, consequences, and remedies, 83
  9. Entman R. M., 1992, Journalism Quarterly, 69, 341, 10.1177/107769909206900209 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/0016549204041472 · DOI
  11. 10.1023/A:1018875711082 · DOI
  12. 10.1023/A:1007054618340 · DOI
  13. 10.1023/A:1020469715532 · DOI
  14. Goffman E., 1974, Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience
  15. 10.2105/AJPH.93.8.1342 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/10640260490267742 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/oby.2007.635 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/10810730701326051 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Klein H., 2005, Eating and Weight Disorders, 10, 107, 10.1007/BF03327532 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.08.001 · DOI
  21. 10.1177/1081180X04266581 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s12160-009-9083-x · DOI · Paper page
  23. Martindale C., 1990, Newspaper Research Journal, 11, 96, 10.1177/073953299001100312 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/10810730.2010.535108 · DOI
  25. 10.1086/267990 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Messaris P., 2001, Framing public life, 215
  27. 2010, NPPA code of ethics
  28. 10.1023/A:1024834831093 · DOI
  29. 2009, Internet overtakes newspapers as news outlet
  30. 10.1038/oby.2001.108 · DOI
  31. 10.2105/AJPH.2009.159491 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/oby.2007.521 · DOI
  33. 10.1057/palgrave.sth.8700057 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.11.004 · DOI
  35. 10.1080/15551390009363436 · DOI
  36. 2010, Code of ethics
  37. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.08.002 · DOI
  38. 10.1177/1359105307084318 · DOI
  39. 10.1037/0022-3514.55.5.738 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Heuer, C. A., McClure, K. J., & Puhl, R. M.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Puhl, Rebecca M.
Venue
Journal of Health Communication
Published
2011-10
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
976-987
ISSN
  • 1081-0730 (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0415
OpenAlex
W2089614744
Cited by
342
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 9
FWCI
14.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health Communication (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Influence and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
weight stigma, photojournalism, online news, media representation of obesity, overweight individuals, body image, prejudice and discrimination, news images
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Media, Obesity, Photography, Public Opinion, Stereotyping, United States, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review