Cited by 55Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareMedia Influence and Health

Interventions for improving population health literacy: insights from a rapid review of the evidence

Barry, Margaret M., D'Eath, Maureen, Sixsmith, Jane·2013·Journal of Health Communication

Abstract

The promotion of health literacy is critical to active and informed participation in health promotion, disease prevention, and health care. This article reports on a rapid review of the evidence concerning effective strategies for improving health literacy. This review was undertaken as part of a series of evidence reviews commissioned by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control through the Translating Health Communications Project. The authors searched a range of electronic databases and identified six evidence reviews published between 2000 and 2011. A narrative synthesis of the findings was then conducted. The majority of the published research originated in the United States, and the studies reviewed mainly focused on functional health literacy interventions that occurred in clinical settings. Considerable gaps in the evidence exist regarding the most effective population-level health literacy interventions, particularly with regard to communicable diseases. There is a paucity of intervention studies conducted on this topic in Europe. Implications of the findings for improving population health literacy on the prevention and control of communicable diseases in Europe are considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10810730.2013.840699

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interventions to improve health literacy have included using simple language, presenting information in audio-visual formats, tailoring content to individual needs, and other forms of interactivity.

    “Interventions to improve health literacy have included using simple language, presenting information in audio-visual formats, tailoring content to individual needs, and other forms of interactivity.[45][46][47]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barry, M. M., D'Eath, M., & Sixsmith, J.
Affiliations
  • Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
  • National University of Ireland Galway
Corresponding author
Barry, Margaret M.
Venue
Journal of Health Communication
Published
2013-12
Volume
18
Issue
12
Pages
1507-1522
ISSN
  • 1081-0730 (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0415
OpenAlex
W2053116125
Cited by
55
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
FWCI
6.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health Communication (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
health literacy, health literacy interventions, population health, functional health literacy, infectious diseases, disease prevention, health promotion, clinical settings, evidence gaps, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
MeSH terms
Communicable Disease Control, Europe, Health Promotion, Humans, Review Literature as Topic, Health Literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review