Cited by 48Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesYouth, Drugs, and ViolenceChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Adolescent substance use in the context of the family: a qualitative study of young people’s views on parent-child attachments, parenting style and parental substance use

Open access
McLaughlin, Aisling, Campbell, Anne, McColgan, Mary·2016·Substance Use & Misuse

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adolescent substance use can place youth at risk of a range of poor outcomes. Few studies have attempted to explore in-depth young people's perceptions of how familial processes and dynamics influence adolescent substance use. OBJECTIVES: This article aimed to explore risk and protective factors for youth substance use within the context of the family with a view to informing family based interventions. METHODS: Nine focus groups supplemented with participatory techniques were facilitated with a purposive sample of sixty-two young people (age 13-17 years) from post-primary schools across Northern Ireland. The data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the data: (1) parent-child attachments, (2) parenting style, and (3) parental and sibling substance misuse. Parent-child attachment was identified as an important factor in protecting adolescents from substance use in addition to effective parenting particularly an authoritative style supplemented with parental monitoring and strong parent-child communication to encourage child disclosure. Family substance use was considered to impact on children's substance use if exposed at an early age and the harms associated with parental substance misuse were discussed in detail. Both parent and child gender differences were cross-cutting themes. CONCLUSION: Parenting programmes (tailored to mothers and fathers) may benefit young people via components on authoritative styles, parental monitoring, communication, nurturing attachments and parent-child conflict. Youth living with more complex issues, e.g., parental substance misuse, may benefit from programmes delivered beyond the family environment, e.g., school based settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10826084.2016.1197941

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McLaughlin, A., Campbell, A., & McColgan, M.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • University of Ulster (GB)
Corresponding author
McLaughlin, Aisling
Venue
Substance Use & Misuse
Published
2016-09-08
Volume
51
Issue
14
Pages
1846-1855
ISSN
  • 1082-6084 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2491
OpenAlex
W2516774067
Cited by
48
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Substance Use & Misuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Youth, Drugs, and Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
adolescent substance use, parent-child attachment, parenting styles, authoritative parenting, parental substance use, parental supervision, parent-child communication, risk and protective factors, family intervention, gender differences, youth perspectives
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Humans, Northern Ireland, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Parenting, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review