Cited by 115Text Readability and SimplificationReading and Literacy DevelopmentSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

A Second Look at the Validityl of Readability Formulas

Klare, George R.·1976·Journal of Reading Behavior

Abstract

In this paper major factors interacting with readability measures in validity studies are identified and described. The basis for the analysis presented are thirty-six experimental studies of the effect of readability variables upon reader comprehension and/or retention. Emphasis is placed on the interacting nature of the factors involved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10862967609547171

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klare, G. R.
Affiliations
Ohio University (US)
Corresponding author
Klare, George R.
Venue
Journal of Reading Behavior
Published
1976-06
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
129-152
ISSN
0022-4111 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1491067015
Cited by
115
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Reading Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text Readability and Simplification
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
readability formulas, validity, reader comprehension, retention, interaction effects, text complexity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review