The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Classification of Internet Retail Stores
Abstract
:This article describes an empirical method for classifying Internet retail sites for electronic commerce. The technique used 35 observable Internet retail site attributes and features of online stores as the raw data to classify the online stores into meaningful groups. This paper presents a classification of online retail stores based upon an August 1996 convenience sample of 137 Internet retail stores. Descriptive statistics for 44 variables provide a snapshot of key attributes and features of online stores. Subsequent cluster and factor analysis identified five distinct Web catalog interface categories: superstores, promotional stores, plain sales stores, one-page stores, and product listings. Online stores differ primarily on the three dimensions: size, service offerings, and interface quality. A preponderance of the stores in the study hod limited product selection, few service features, and poor interfaces. This categorization provides a better understanding of the strategies pursued in Internet-based marketing and will be helpful for Internet retail store designers as well as for researchers to structure and target further analyses in this domain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Usability Engineering Lifecycle
NIELSEN, J. (1993) · Usability Engineering · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-052029-2.50007-3 · Cited by 2,657
Cited by
Service quality delivery through web sites: a critical review of extant knowledge
Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Malhotra, A. (2002) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/009207002236911 · Cited by 2,729
Consumer trust in an Internet store
Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Vitale, M. (2000) · Information Technology and Management · doi:10.1023/a:1019104520776 · Cited by 2,577
The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty
Flavián, C., Guinalíu, M., & Gurrea, R. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2005.01.002 · Cited by 1,684
The influence of online product recommendations on consumers' online choices
Senecal, S., & Nantel, J. (2004) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2004.04.001 · Cited by 1,585
Identifying key factors affecting consumer purchase behavior in an online shopping context
Park, C., & Kim, Y. (2003) · International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management · doi:10.1108/09590550310457818 · Cited by 914
Metadata
- Authors
- Spiller, P., & Lohse, G. L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Electronic Commerce
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-12-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 29-56
- ISSN
- 1086-4415 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9301
- OpenAlex
- W1712308543
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 33.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.