The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The dimensions of successful young adult development: A conceptual and measurement framework
Open accessAbstract
In this article, we draw on the theoretical and empirical literature to name what appear to be core dimensions of successful young adult development. We also describe some possible indicators and measures of those dimensions and sketch the kinds of developmental relationships and opportunities young people need in adolescence to effectively transition to a successful young adulthood, as well as the developmental relationships and opportunities young adults need for continued well-being. We name eight social, psychological, behavioral, educational, occupational, health, ethical, and civic dimensions of successful young adult development, and suggest that only a minority of adolescents are well-prepared to make a transition to successful young adulthood. The goal of the article is twofold: to contribute to the articulation of and consensus on the dimensions of successful young adult development, and to lay the groundwork for subsequent research to empirically validate both those core dimensions, as well as developmental indicators of progress toward attainment of these proposed dimensions of well-being.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties.
Arnett, J. J. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.5.469 · Cited by 16,843
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
Bandura, A. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122 · Cited by 15,975
Positive psychology: An introduction.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.5 · Cited by 11,351
Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136319 · Cited by 7,791 · cited 1×
“…of self-efficacy, mastery, and internal control are available, including the Pearlin Mastery Scale (Pearlin, Menaghan, Lieberman, & Mullan, 1981; Pearlin & Schooler, 1978) and Bandura’s (1977, 1982, 1997) selfefficacy measures and measures of internal vs. external locus of control (Levenson,…”
MethodScheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1063 · Cited by 7,456
Pearlin, L. I., Menaghan, E. G., Lieberman, M. A., & Mullan, J. T. (1981) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136676 · Cited by 6,289
Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.64 · Cited by 5,428
Self-citationThe Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence
Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472 · Cited by 5,173
Cited by
Ye, Z., Yang, X., Zeng, C., Wang, Y., Shen, Z., Li, X., & Lin, D. (2020) · Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1111/aphw.12211 · Cited by 478
Ciocanel, O., Power, K., Eriksen, A., & Gillings, K. (2017) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-016-0555-6 · Cited by 179
Arslan, İ. B., Lucassen, N., van Lier, P. A. C., de Haan, A. D., & Prinzie, P. (2021) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-020-01959-w · Cited by 117
Emotion Regulation and Academic Burnout Among Youth: a Quantitative Meta-analysis
Iuga, I. A., & David, O. A. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09930-w · Cited by 42
Lee Marmol, N., Ryan, N. P., Sood, N., Morrison, E., Botchway-Commey, E., Anderson, V., & Catroppa, C. (2025) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602011.2024.2319910 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Scales, P. C., Benson, P. L., Oesterle, S., Hill, K. G., Hawkins, J. D., & Pashak, T. J.
- Venue
- Applied Developmental Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-12-16
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 150-174
- ISSN
- 1088-8691 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-480X
- OpenAlex
- W2212682591
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 13.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The dimensions of successful young adult development: A conceptual and measurement framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10888691.2015.1082429
- The paper
- Scales, P. C., Benson, P. L., Oesterle, S., Hill, K. G., Hawkins, J. D., & Pashak, T. J. (2016). The dimensions of successful young adult development: A conceptual and measurement framework. Applied Developmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2015.1082429
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
