Visitors’ effects on the welfare of animals in the zoo: a review
Abstract
Since the 1970s, research about zoo visitors' effects on the welfare of nonhuman animals in captivity has intensified. Numerous studies have shown that characteristics such as visitor presence, density, activity, size, and position are associated with animal behavioral and--to a lesser extent physiological--changes. Studies usually interpret these changes as negative (undesirable) or positive (enriching), but it remains unclear whether they significantly impinge on animal welfare. To make confident conclusions about visitors' effects necessitates more studies using (a) a wider range of animal groupings, (b) measures of stress, (c) visitor-animal variables, and (d) other methodological improvements In the meantime, in addition to further research, individual zoos need to emphasize (a) monitoring the stress indicators of their captive animals, (b) observing visitor behavior, and (c) ensuring that staffs are aware of the "visitor effect" concept.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies have documented the sensitivity of captive species to visitor number.
“Previous studies have documented the sensitivity of captive species to visitor number (Davey, 2007).”
From Husbandry and enclosure influences on penguin behavior and conservation breeding (2016) · cites this paper as Davey, 2007
The effect of visitors on the welfare of captive animals has been widely studied for more than four decades.
“While the effect of visitors on the welfare of captive animals has been widely studied for more than four decades (Hosey, 2000;Davey, 2007;Hosey, 2013)”
From Effect of weather conditions and presence of visitors on adrenocortical activity in captive African penguins (Spheniscus demersus) (2017) · cites this paper as Davey, 2007
Naturalistic exhibits may allow animals greater freedom of movement, enhancing choice and control over interactions with visitors, which may reduce negative impacts from the public.
“It is possible that naturalistic exhibits allow animals greater freedom of movement, enhancing choice and control over their interactions with visitors (Davey, 2007), which may reduce potentially negative impacts from the public.”
From Effect of weather conditions and presence of visitors on adrenocortical activity in captive African penguins (Spheniscus demersus) (2017) · cites this paper as Davey, 2007
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 49 · Cited by 226
- Authors
- Davey, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Chester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Davey, Gareth
- ORCID
- Davey, Gareth
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-05-17
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 169-183
- ISSN
- 1088-8705 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7604
- OpenAlex
- W1963920093
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Keywords
- visitor effects, zoo animal welfare, captive animals, visitor density, animal behavior, stress symptoms
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Welfare, Animals, Zoo, Facility Design and Construction, Housing, Animal, Humans, Observation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review