Cited by 4Coastal and Marine ManagementIndigenous Studies and EcologyArctic and Russian Policy Studies

Transboundary marine mammal management in the northern Bering-Chukchi sea large marine area

Aho, Kelsey B., Meek, Chanda L.·2020·Polar Geography

Abstract

Indigenous arctic communities access terrestrial and marine wildlife. This access contributes to their food sovereignty. Ineffective management of wildlife that migrate internationally jeopardizes local and regional access to these species and subsequently hunting practices and human health. Despite general recognition of the role of effective transboundary management in food security, the issue remains under-studied. One puzzle is why some food sources (i.e. marine mammals) with transboundary policies have been sustainably managed, while others have not. Guided by Mitchell’s ‘four factors’ framework, this research compares the effectiveness of the transboundary management of the Bering-Chukchi-Beaufort bowhead whale population and the Chukchi Sea polar bear population in the Northern Bering-Chukchi Sea Large Marine Ecosystem. We find that the cases diverged in terms of governance and transparency. Regarding the management of the Chukchi Sea polar bear population, information and incentives were only sometimes present and capacities were rarely present. Based on the effective aspects of the evaluated transboundary agreements, we recommend the following for transboundary marine mammal management in the Arctic: 1) that local and regional financial, administrative, and technical capacities are included at the decision-making table, and 2) that western science is used in conjunction with Indigenous Knowledge or to co-produce knowledge.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1088937x.2020.1798539

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aho, K. B., & Meek, C. L.
Affiliations
University of Alaska Fairbanks (US)
Corresponding author
Aho, Kelsey B.
Venue
Polar Geography
Published
2020-08-04
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
313-332
ISSN
  • 0148-7671 (ISSN-L)
  • 1088-937X
  • 1939-0513
OpenAlex
W3047134097
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Polar Geography (publishedVersion)
Funders
Office of Polar Programs (1338850: Arctic FRontiers Of SusTainability)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
Keywords
bowhead whale, Indigenous food sovereignty, indigenous knowledge, knowledge co-production, large marine ecosystems, hunting access, governance transparency, capacity building

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review