Cited by 29Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMachine Learning in HealthcareEmergency and Acute Care Studies

Emergency patient triage improvement through a retrieval-augmented generation enhanced large-scale language model

Yazaki, Megumi, Maki, Satoshi, Furuya, Takeo, Inoue, Ken, Nagai, Ko, Nagashima, Yuki, Maruyama, Juntaro, Toki, Yasunori +11 more·2025·Prehospital Emergency Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Emergency medical triage is crucial for prioritizing patient care in emergency situations, yet its effectiveness can vary significantly based on the experience and training of the personnel involved. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of integrating Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) with Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically OpenAI's GPT models, to standardize triage procedures and reduce variability in emergency care. METHODS: We created 100 simulated triage scenarios based on modified cases from the Japanese National Examination for Emergency Medical Technicians. These scenarios were processed by the RAG-enhanced LLMs, and the models were given patient vital signs, symptoms, and observations from emergency medical services (EMS) teams as inputs. The primary outcome was the accuracy of triage classifications, which was used to compare the performance of the RAG-enhanced LLMs with that of emergency medical technicians and emergency physicians. Secondary outcomes included the rates of under-triage and over-triage. RESULTS: < 0.05). Additionally, this model demonstrated a substantial reduction in under-triage rates to 8%, compared with 33% for GPT-3.5 without RAG, and 39% for GPT-4 without RAG. CONCLUSIONS: The integration of RAG with LLMs shows promise in improving the accuracy and consistency of medical assessments in emergency settings. Further validation in diverse medical settings with broader datasets is necessary to confirm the effectiveness and adaptability of these technologies in live environments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10903127.2024.2374400

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yazaki, M., Maki, S., Furuya, T., Inoue, K., Nagai, K., Nagashima, Y., Maruyama, J., Toki, Y., Kitagawa, K., Iwata, S., Kitamura, T., Gushiken, S., Noguchi, Y., Inoue, M., Shiga, Y., Inage, K., Orita, S., Nakada, T., & Ohtori, S.
Affiliations
  • Chiba University (JP)
  • Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital (JP)
  • Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Chiba University
Corresponding author
Maki, Satoshi
Venue
Prehospital Emergency Care
Published
2024-07-11
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
203-209
ISSN
  • 1090-3127 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-0066
OpenAlex
W4400187039
Cited by
29
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 2
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Prehospital Emergency Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
JSPS KAKENHI
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
retrieval-augmented generation, large language models, GPT-4, undertriage, overtriage, emergency medical technicians, emergency physicians, AI-assisted triage
MeSH terms
Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Medical Technicians, Humans, Japan, Triage, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review