The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cultural-Historical Activity Theory: Exploring a Theory to Inform Practice and Research
Abstract
Cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT) is one of several practice-based approaches that provide a robust framework for analyzing professional work practices, including social service provision (Julkunen, 2011 Julkunen, I. (2011). Knowledge-production processes in practice research: Outcomes and critical elements. Social Work & Society, 9(1), 60–75. [Google Scholar], 2013 Julkunen, I. (2013). Critical examination of the research in practice and the development of social services in HUSK: A practice research perspective. Paper presented at the Workshop of the HUSK Work Group on Evidence-informed Human Service Practice, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley. [Google Scholar]). By offering a multi-dimensional, systemic approach that includes both psychological motives and all kinds of tools, as well as the always-present dynamics of power, money, culture, and history, CHAT enables researchers to analyze complex and evolving professional practices and practitioners to engage in reflective research. This article provides an overview of CHAT as a framework for practice-based research in social work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization
Engeström, Y. (2001) · Journal of Education and Work · doi:10.1080/13639080020028747 · Cited by 5,436
Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research
Engeström, Y. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139814744 · Cited by 4,991
Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design
Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2007) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v12i4.1772 · Cited by 1,647 · cited 1×
“…care (Sundet, 2010), strategizing and managing organizational processes (Blackler, Crump, & McDonald, 1999, 2000), designing digital technologies (Kaptelinin & Nardi, 2006), tracing the computerization of architectural design (Groleau, Demers, Lalancette, & Barros, 2012), developing public…”
BackgroundExpansive Visibilization of Work: An Activity-Theoretical Perspective
Engeström, Y. (1999) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1023/a:1008648532192 · Cited by 492
Organizing Processes in Complex Activity Networks
Blackler, F., Crump, N., & McDonald, S. (2000) · Organization · doi:10.1177/135050840072005 · Cited by 297
Computer-Mediated Activity: Functional Organs in Social and Developmental Contexts
Kaptelinin, V. (1995) · Context and Consciousness · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2137.003.0007 · Cited by 237
Engeström, Y., & Miettinen, R. (1999) · Perspectives on Activity Theory · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812774.002 · Cited by 228
Metadata
- Authors
- Foot, K. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-03-25
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 329-347
- ISSN
- 1091-1359 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-3556
- OpenAlex
- W2017264664
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 39.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cultural-Historical Activity Theory: Exploring a Theory to Inform Practice and Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10911359.2013.831011
- The paper
- Foot, K. A. (2014). Cultural-Historical Activity Theory: Exploring a Theory to Inform Practice and Research. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2013.831011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.