Cited by 18Gender Diversity and InequalityGender Politics and RepresentationWork-Family Balance Challenges

Beyond the glass ceiling: an exploration of the experiences of female corporate organizational leaders in Ghana

Open access
Amakye, Samuel, Chimhutu, Victor, Darkwah, Ernest·2022·Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment

Abstract

Although an increase in the inclusion of women in the global labor market has been reported in recent times, existing literature show that women are still heavily underrepresented in organizational leadership positions. Many studies in this area mainly focused on perceived barriers to women’s ascend to leadership positions, while little attention is paid to insights into the lived experiences of women who have already managed to assume leadership positions. This study was conducted to plug this gap in the literature. We interviewed 10 women corporate organizational leaders in Ghana to share their lived experiences as female leaders within the Ghanaian context. Our findings reveal that women still face several challenges even after breaking the glass ceiling to attain leadership positions in corporate organizations in Ghana. The main challenges were raised around the issue of gender, discrimination, age, their roles as mothers and wives. On the other hand, their positions also came with benefits and opportunities such as improved financial status, a command for respect as well as increasing their social and business networking capacity. More importantly, age although a disadvantage for the young women leaders, it was seen as a resource for older women as it enhances their respect and seen as performance of motherhood roles in this Ghanaian context. The study concludes that although women leaders’ experiences are largely negative, older women leaders seemed to utilize their positions actively and creatively and perform pseudo-motherhood roles which in turn helps them in the performance of their leadership roles.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10911359.2021.1970073

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women continue to face prejudices and stereotypes even after attaining leadership positions.

    “Similar to the findings of Amakye et al. (2021) and Rincón et al. (2017), the results obtained in this study indicate that women continue to face prejudices and stereotypes even after attaining leadership positions.”

    From Barriers to Leadership: Experiences of Women Leaders in Business and Politics (2024) · cites this paper as Amakye et al. (2021)

  • The challenges inherent in the practice of leadership can have an impact on the low participation of other women in pursuing such positions.

    “Such studies also suggest that the challenges inherent in the practice of leadership can even have an impact on the low participation of other women in pursuing such positions.”

    From Barriers to Leadership: Experiences of Women Leaders in Business and Politics (2024) · cites this paper as Amakye et al. (2021)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Adusah-Karikari, A., & Ohemeng, F. L. K. (2014). Representative bureaucracy in the public service? A critical analysis of the challenges confronting women in the civil service of Ghana. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(9), 568–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2013.879882 · DOI
  2. Akuamoah-Boateng, R., Bolitho, F. H., Carr, S. C., Chidgey, J. E., O’Reilly, B., Phillips, R., & Rugimbana, R. O. (2003). Psychosocial barriers to female leadership: Motivational gravity in Ghana and Tanzania. Psychology and Developing Societies, 15(2), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/097133360301500206 · DOI
  3. Amos‐Wilson, P. (1999). Some issues concerning women in senior management: A case study from Ghana. Public Administration and Development: The International Journal of Management Research and Practice, 19(3), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-162X(199908)19:3<219::AID-PAD78>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
  4. Apusigah, A. A. (2004). Gender, vulnerability and the politics of decision-making in Ghana: The case of the Upper East Region. Ghana Journal of Development Studies, 1(2), 6–26. http://doi.org/10.4314/gjds.v1i2.35004 · DOI
  5. Ayman, R., & Korabik, K. (2010). Leadership: Why gender and culture matter. American Psychologist, 65(3), 157. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018806 · DOI
  6. Boateng, D. A. (2018). Experiences of female academics in Ghana: Negotiation and strengths as strategies for successful careers. African Journal of Social Work, 8(1), 21–30. http://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajsw/article/view/172906(open in a new window)
  7. Carbajal, J. (2018). Women and work: Ascending to leadership positions. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 28(1), 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2017.1387084 · DOI
  8. Carli, L. L., & Eagly, A. H. (2001). Gender, hierarchy, and leadership: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 629–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00232 · DOI
  9. Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2009). Editors’ introduction: Is the personal pedagogical? Sexualities and genders in the higher education classroom. Feminism & Psychology, 19(2), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353509102186 · DOI
  10. Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 276. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.276 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Forsyth, D. R., Heiney, M. M., & Wright, S. S. (1997). Biases in appraisals of women leaders. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.1.1.98 · DOI
  13. Giorgi, A. (Ed.). (1975). An application for phenomenological method in psychology. Pittsburg, PA: Duquesne University Press.
  14. Greguletz, E., Diehl, M.-R., & Kreutzer, K. (2019). Why women build less effective networks than men: The role of structural exclusion and personal hesitation. Human Relations, 72(7), 1234–1261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718804303 · DOI
  15. Hallinger, P., & Leithwood, K. (1998). Unseen forces: The impact of social culture on school leadership. Peabody Journal of Education, 73(2), 126–151. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327930pje7302_6 · DOI
  16. Hoyt, C. L. (2010). Women, men, and leadership: Exploring the gender gap at the top. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(7), 484–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00274.x · DOI
  17. Ibarra, H., Ely, R., & Kolb, D. (2013). Women rising: The unseen barriers. Harvard Business Review, 91(9), 60–66. http//hbr.org/2013/09/women-rising-the-unseen-barriers
  18. Lyness, K. S., & Heilman, M. E. (2006). When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 777. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.777 · DOI
  19. Oakley, J. G. (2000). Gender-based barriers to senior management positions: Understanding the scarcity of female CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(4), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006226129868 · DOI
  20. Oduro, G. K., & Macbeath, J. (2003). Traditions and tensions in leadership: The Ghanaian experience. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764032000122050 · DOI
  21. Oplatka, I. (2006). Women in educational administration within developing countries: Towards a new international research agenda. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(6), 604–624. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230610704819 · DOI
  22. Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2005). The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over‐represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of Management, 16(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00433.x · DOI
  23. Titi Amayah, A., & Haque, M. (2017). Experiences and challenges of women leaders in Sub-Saharan Africa. Africa Journal of Management, 3(1), 99–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322373.2017.1278663 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amakye, S., Chimhutu, V., & Darkwah, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Bergen (NO)
  • University of Ghana (GH)
Corresponding author
Amakye, Samuel
Venue
Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment
Published
2021-08-31
Volume
32
Issue
7
Pages
858-875
ISSN
  • 1091-1359 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-3556
OpenAlex
W3198524519
Cited by
18
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Politics and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
Keywords
glass ceiling, women in leadership, gender discrimination, age discrimination, work-family balance, Ghana

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review