CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 102Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and TraumaAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Attachment Style and Early Maladaptive Schemas as Mediators of the Relationship between Childhood Emotional Abuse and Intimate Partner Violence

Gay, Lauren E., Harding, Hilary G., Jackson, Joan L., Burns, Erin E., Baker, Brittany D.·2013·Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma
DOI 10.1080/10926771.2013.775982
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Theoretical and empirical research suggests possible pathways between women's experiences of childhood emotional abuse (CEA) and later intimate partner violence victimization (IPV-V) and perpetration (IPV-P), including attachment style and early maladaptive schemas. This study tested a model examining the unique mediating effects of insecure attachment and early maladaptive schemas on the relationship between CEA and IPV-V (n = 396) or IPV-P (n = 409) in college women. Contrary to hypotheses that both attachment style and maladaptive schema endorsement would mediate the relationship between CEA and IPV-V and IPV-P, regression analyses indicated the disconnection/rejection schema domain was the only significant mediator between CEA and IPV-V (p = .01). This same relation held for childhood emotional abuse and IPV-P (p < .001). These findings provide preliminary clinical utility for examining schema endorsement, the use of schema therapy (Young, Klosko, & Weishar, 2003 Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S. and Weishar, M. E. 2003. Schema therapy: A practitioner's guide, New York: NY: Guilford. [Google Scholar]), or both with women who have emotional abuse and IPV histories.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10926771.2013.775982

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bernstein D. P., 1998, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire: A retrospective self-report. Manual
  2. 10.1016/S0145-2134 (02)00541-0 · DOI
  3. 10.1177/088626051416469 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Gay, L. E., Harding, H. G., Jackson, J. L., Burns, E. E., & Baker, B. D.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Gay, Lauren E.
ORCID
Baker, Brittany D.
Venue
Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2013-04
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
408-424
ISSN
  • 1092-6771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-083X
DOI
10.1080/10926771.2013.775982
OpenAlex
W1967386740
Cited by
102
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
childhood emotional abuse, intimate partner violence, intimate partner violence perpetration, intimate partner violence victimization, attachment styles, insecure attachment, early maladaptive schemas, disconnection/rejection schema, schema therapy, female university students, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review