The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Foreign Body Reaction to Meshes Used for the Repair of Abdominal Wall Hernias
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the local tissue reactions to meshes that had been removed from humans. DESIGN: Open study SETTING: Surgical department of the technical University, Aachen, Germany. MATERIAL: Samples of 17 non-absorbable meshes (1 polyester, 10 polypropylene, 2 reduced polypropylene, and 4 polytetrafluorethylene, PTFE) and 1 absorbable mesh (polyglactin 910) that had been implanted for repair of abdominal wall defects. INTERVENTIONS: Light and transmission electron microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and histological examination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Signs of inflammatory response. RESULTS: Light microscopy showed chronic inflammatory tissue reaction, even after years, with pronounced differences among materials. Partial volume of inflammatory cells (%) varied from 32 in polypropylene, to 12 in expanded PTFE, 8 in polyester, and 7 in reduced polypropylene. Formation of connective tissue correlated significantly with the extent of the inflammatory reaction (p<0.01). In meshes implanted for long periods there were still numerous macrophages at the interface between tissue and polypropylene (45%), polyester (45%), expanded PTFE (25%), and reduced polypropylene (22%). There was no difference in time dependent tissue reactions (p = 0.19). CONCLUSION: Inflammation around alloplastic materials used to repair defects in the abdominal wall persists for many years. There was evidence of long term wound complications as a result of persistent foreign body reactions. Further studies are required to evaluate the long term tissue response to these materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Extracellular matrix-based materials for regenerative medicine
Hussey, G. S., Dziki, J. L., & Badylak, S. F. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-018-0023-x · Cited by 844
The Argument for Lightweight Polypropylene Mesh in Hernia Repair
Cobb, W. S., Kercher, K. W., & Heniford, B. T. (2005) · Surgical Innovation · doi:10.1177/155335060501200109 · Cited by 364
Past, Present and Future of Surgical Meshes: A Review
Baylón, K., Rodríguez-Camarillo, P., Elías-Zúñiga, A., Díaz-Elizondo, J., Gilkerson, R., & Lozano, K. (2017) · Membranes · doi:10.3390/membranes7030047 · Cited by 292
Mechanical properties of the abdominal wall and biomaterials utilized for hernia repair
Deeken, C. R., & Lake, S. P. (2017) · Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.05.008 · Cited by 258
ECM hydrogel coating mitigates the chronic inflammatory response to polypropylene mesh
Faulk, D. M., Londono, R., Wolf, M. T., Ranallo, C. A., Carruthers, C. A., Wildemann, J. D., Dearth, C. L., & Badylak, S. F. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.06.057 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Klinge, B. K.
- Venue
- The European Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-07-21
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 665-673
- ISSN
- 1102-4151 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114315030
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Foreign Body Reaction to Meshes Used for the Repair of Abdominal Wall Hernias. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/11024159950189726
- The paper
- Klinge, B. K. (1999). Foreign Body Reaction to Meshes Used for the Repair of Abdominal Wall Hernias. The European Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1080/11024159950189726
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.