Initial safety evaluation of Enterococcus faecium LBB.E81
Open accessAbstract
Due to their antimicrobial activity Enterococcus faecium strains have a growing record of use as beneficial adjunct cultures in animal nutrition or components of probiotic preparations for humans. However, safety concerns accompany the application of enterococci, as clinical strains associated with infection have been isolated, especially antibiotic resistant cultures. With the increasing availability of whole genome sequencing (WGS), valuable safety data can be extracted in the early phase of development of the probiotic dossier of an E. faecium strain. Here we report the results of initial safety assessment of E. faecium LBB.E81 by selecting accessible commercial antibiotic susceptibility test and WGS. Testing against a panel of antibiotic substances showed that E. faecium LBB.E81 was susceptible to all antimicrobials with the exception of its intrinsic, non-transferable resistance to nitrofurantoin. The identified antibiotic resistance genes of E. faecium LBB.E81 aac(6')-Ii, msrC and efmA belonged to a group of intrinsic non-transferable factors contributing to the lower susceptibility of the E. faecium species to aminoglycoside and macrolide antibiotics but with minimal inhibitory concentrations for E. faecium LBB.E81 below the threshold values determined for resistant strains. The only potential virulence factor genes found in the genome of E. faecium LBB.E81 were a defective acm (collagen-binding adhesin) and efaAfm (antigen A – like protein) without any evidence for its involvement in pathogenicity. Other hospital associated virulence factor genes of E. faecium such as IS16, hyl, asa-type genes, cyl; gelE and fsr, sprE and esp(fm) were found to be absent in E. faecium LBB.E81.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recurrent Enterococcus-associated background genes should not be treated as equivalent to acquired mobile ARGs.
“These observations support our interpretation that recurrent Enterococcus-associated background genes should not be treated as equivalent to acquired mobile ARGs.”
aac(6′)-Ii, msrC and efmA in E. faecium LBB.E81 belonged to intrinsic non-transferable factors contributing to lower susceptibility to some antimicrobials, while the strain remained acceptable in an initial safety assessment.
“Urshev and Yungareva reported that aac(6′)-Ii, msrC and efmA in E. faecium LBB.E81 belonged to intrinsic non-transferable factors contributing to lower susceptibility to some antimicrobials, while the strain remained acceptable in an initial safety assessment [27].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 17
- Authors
- Urshev, Z., & Yungareva, T.
- Affiliations
- Sofia Municipality (BG)
- Corresponding author
- Urshev, Zoltan
- Venue
- Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-10-29
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-17
- ISSN
- 1310-2818 (ISSN-L)
- 1314-3530
- OpenAlex
- W3094761714
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Keywords
- probiotic safety, antibiotic resistance genes, aac(6')-II, nitrofurantoin resistance, virulence genes, whole genome sequencing, antibiotic susceptibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review