Cited by 17Probiotics and Fermented FoodsAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Initial safety evaluation of Enterococcus faecium LBB.E81

Open access
Urshev, Zoltan, Yungareva, Tsvetelina·2021·Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment

Abstract

Due to their antimicrobial activity Enterococcus faecium strains have a growing record of use as beneficial adjunct cultures in animal nutrition or components of probiotic preparations for humans. However, safety concerns accompany the application of enterococci, as clinical strains associated with infection have been isolated, especially antibiotic resistant cultures. With the increasing availability of whole genome sequencing (WGS), valuable safety data can be extracted in the early phase of development of the probiotic dossier of an E. faecium strain. Here we report the results of initial safety assessment of E. faecium LBB.E81 by selecting accessible commercial antibiotic susceptibility test and WGS. Testing against a panel of antibiotic substances showed that E. faecium LBB.E81 was susceptible to all antimicrobials with the exception of its intrinsic, non-transferable resistance to nitrofurantoin. The identified antibiotic resistance genes of E. faecium LBB.E81 aac(6')-Ii, msrC and efmA belonged to a group of intrinsic non-transferable factors contributing to the lower susceptibility of the E. faecium species to aminoglycoside and macrolide antibiotics but with minimal inhibitory concentrations for E. faecium LBB.E81 below the threshold values determined for resistant strains. The only potential virulence factor genes found in the genome of E. faecium LBB.E81 were a defective acm (collagen-binding adhesin) and efaAfm (antigen A – like protein) without any evidence for its involvement in pathogenicity. Other hospital associated virulence factor genes of E. faecium such as IS16, hyl, asa-type genes, cyl; gelE and fsr, sprE and esp(fm) were found to be absent in E. faecium LBB.E81.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13102818.2020.1840438

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 17

Authors
Urshev, Z., & Yungareva, T.
Affiliations
Sofia Municipality (BG)
Corresponding author
Urshev, Zoltan
Venue
Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment
Published
2020-10-29
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
11-17
ISSN
  • 1310-2818 (ISSN-L)
  • 1314-3530
OpenAlex
W3094761714
Cited by
17
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
probiotic safety, antibiotic resistance genes, aac(6')-II, nitrofurantoin resistance, virulence genes, whole genome sequencing, antibiotic susceptibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review