The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond the Ladder of Participation: An Analytical Toolkit for the Critical Analysis of Participatory Media Processes
Open accessAbstract
Participatory research is facing three challenges—how to deal with the theoretisation and conceptualisation of participation; how to support the research with analytical models; and how the evaluate the research outcomes. This article aims to address these three problems by distinguishing two main approaches (a sociological and a political) in participatory theory and developing a four-level and 12-step analytical model that functions within the political approach. In this analytical model, a series of key concepts are used: process, field, actor, decision-making moment and power. The normative-evaluative problem is addressed by reverting to the critical perspective to evaluate the societal desirability of particular participatory intensities. This critical perspective—potentially—adds a 13th and final normative layer to the analytical model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
Arnstein, S. R. (1969) · Journal of the American Institute of Planners · doi:10.1080/01944366908977225 · Cited by 17,064
Participation and Democratic Theory
Pateman, C. (1970) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511720444 · Cited by 6,159
Hogan, B. (2010) · Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society · doi:10.1177/0270467610385893 · Cited by 1,318
Cited by
Effective voice: Beyond exit and affect in online communities
Frey, S., & Schneider, N. (2023) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448211044025 · Cited by 18
(2024) · doi:10.3390/socsci13050266 · Cited by 11
Civís Zaragoza, M., & Díaz-Gibson, J. (2024) · International Journal of Leadership in Education · doi:10.1080/13603124.2024.2418605 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Carpentier, N.
- Venue
- Javnost - The Public
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-01-02
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 70-88
- ISSN
- 1318-3222 (ISSN-L)
- 1854-8377
- OpenAlex
- W2322812444
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 67.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beyond the Ladder of Participation: An Analytical Toolkit for the Critical Analysis of Participatory Media Processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13183222.2016.1149760
- The paper
- Carpentier, N. (2016). Beyond the Ladder of Participation: An Analytical Toolkit for the Critical Analysis of Participatory Media Processes. Javnost - The Public. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2016.1149760
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.