The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Media, Knowledge and Trust: The Deepening Epistemic Crisis of Democracy
Abstract
The argument has two related parts: firstly, we are witnessing an “epistemic” crisis in public spheres that threatens to undermine political agency. This crisis has to do with the massive amounts and speed of information, the processes by which we construct knowledge, as well as the new forms of knowledge deriving from digital technologies. Many developments in information technologies benefit democracy, but there is a growing concern about cognitive dilemmas. Secondly, in the present tumultuous juncture of Western democracies, dominated by the populist revolt, traditional distrust of media has turned into an assault on basic Enlightenment premises, eroding shared understandings of reality and compatible discourse. “Knowledge” becomes legitimated via emotionality. Critical rationality and progressive politics must engage more with these developments.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Dahlgren, 2018
Citations
Cites
Populism: A Very Short Introduction
Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017) · doi:10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001 · Cited by 3,659
The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media
van Dijck, J. (2013) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001 · Cited by 2,688
The culture of connectivity: a critical history of social media
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-6579 · Cited by 2,117
Hogan, B. (2010) · Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society · doi:10.1177/0270467610385893 · Cited by 1,318
#Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media
Sunstein, C. R. (2017) · doi:10.1515/9781400884711 · Cited by 1,153
Манович, Л. (2013) · Bloomsbury Academic eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781472544988 · Cited by 550
Infoglut: How Too Much Information Is Changing the Way We Think and Know
Andrejevic, M. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203075319 · Cited by 499
Fuchs, C. (2014) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446270066.n2 · Cited by 297
Huss, J. M. (2017) · Cited by 265
Distracted: the erosion of attention and the coming dark age
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-3887 · Cited by 228
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Berardi Franco “Bifo”, 2015, And: Phenomenology of the End
- Fernández-Armesto Filipe., 2010, Truth: A History and Guide for the Perplexed
- Rabin-Havt Ari, 2016, Lies Incorporated: The World of Post-Truth Politics
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social Media and Trust in Scientific Expertise: Debating the Covid-19 Pandemic in The Netherlands
van Dijck, J., & Alinejad, D. (2020) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305120981057 · Cited by 218
Victimhood: The affective politics of vulnerability
Chouliaraki, L. (2020) · European Journal of Cultural Studies · doi:10.1177/1367549420979316 · Cited by 158
Engelke, K. M., Hase, V., & Wintterlin, F. (2019) · Journal of Trust Research · doi:10.1080/21515581.2019.1588741 · Cited by 133
Alternative News Orientation and Trust in Mainstream Media: A Longitudinal Audience Perspective
Andersen, K. V., Shehata, A., & Andersson, D. (2021) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2021.1986412 · Cited by 144
Luengo, M., & García-Marín, D. (2020) · American Journal of Cultural Sociology · doi:10.1057/s41290-020-00115-w · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Dahlgren, P.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Dahlgren, Peter
- ORCID
- Dahlgren, Peter
- Venue
- Javnost - The Public
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-01-31
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 20-27
- ISSN
- 1318-3222 (ISSN-L)
- 1854-8377
- OpenAlex
- W2793216696
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 48 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 26.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Javnost - The Public (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Communication › Digital Media and Philosophy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Keywords
- epistemic crisis, democracy, media, trust, populism, information overload, digital technologies, knowledge construction, political agency, emotionality, critical rationality, Enlightenment, public sphere
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review