#Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media
Abstract
As the Internet grows more sophisticated, it is creating new threats to democracy. Social media companies such as Facebook can sort us ever more efficiently into groups of the like-minded, creating echo chambers that amplify our views. It's no accident that on some occasions, people of different political views cannot even understand each other. It's also no surprise that terrorist groups have been able to exploit social media to deadly effect. Welcome to the age of #Republic. In this revealing book, Cass Sunstein, the New York Times bestselling author of Nudge and The World According to Star Wars , shows how today's Internet is driving political fragmentation, polarization, and even extremism—and what can be done about it. Thoroughly rethinking the critical relationship between democracy and the Internet, Sunstein describes how the online world creates "cybercascades," exploits "confirmation bias," and assists "polarization entrepreneurs." And he explains why online fragmentation endangers the shared conversations, experiences, and understandings that are the lifeblood of democracy. In response, Sunstein proposes practical and legal changes to make the Internet friendlier to democratic deliberation. These changes would get us out of our information cocoons by increasing the frequency of unchosen, unplanned encounters and exposing us to people, places, things, and ideas that we would never have picked for our Twitter feed. #Republic need not be an ironic term. As Sunstein sho…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
La inconsciencia de la acción de mirar el móvil es en sí misma una forma de canalización de la atención mucho más sofisticada e interiorizada dentro del mecanismo neuronal y emocional del ser humano.
“La propia inconsciencia de la acción de mirar el móvil es en sí misma una forma de canalización de la atención mucho más sofisticada e interiorizada dentro del propio mecanismo de funcionamiento neuronal y emocional del ser humano ( Fuchs , 2018; Sunstein , 2017):”
From Redes sociales y consumo digital en jóvenes universitarios: economía de la atención y oligopolios de la comunicación en el siglo XXI (2020) · cites this paper as Sunstein, 2017
Mediated interactions across ideological camps do not necessarily have the beneficial effects hoped for by Sunstein.
“Therefore, mediated interactions across ideological camps do not necessarily have the beneficial effects hoped for by Sunstein (2017).”
From When debates break apart: discursive polarization as a multi-dimensional divergence emerging in and through communication (2023) · cites this paper as Sunstein (2017)
Sunstein emphasized that technology has the potential to increase fragmentation on a larger scale, with people no longer living separately but rather forming groups where those with similar ideological preferences associate exclusively with one another.
“Both in 2001 [7] and then again in 2017 [10], Sunstein emphasized that technology has the potential to increase fragmentation on a larger scale, with people no longer living separately but rather forming groups where those with similar ideological preferences associate exclusively with one another.”
From A systematic review of echo chamber research: comparative analysis of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and varying outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 1,153
- Authors
- Sunstein, C. R.
- Corresponding author
- Sunstein, Cass R.
- ORCID
- Sunstein, Cass R.
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 2017-04-10
- OpenAlex
- W4245999774
- Cited by
- 1,153
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 276 · 2025: 192 · 2024: 98 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 122 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 18
- FWCI
- 94.52
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Keywords
- democracy, internet, social media, political polarization, echo chambers, confirmation bias, extremism, terrorist use of social media, political fragmentation, deliberative democracy, information cocoons, internet regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review