The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Power through, over and in ideas: conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism
Open accessAbstract
Owing to the tendency of discursive institutionalists to conflate the notion that ‘ideas matter' for policy-making with the ‘power of ideas’, little has been done to explicitly theorize ideational power. To fill this lacuna, the contribution defines ideational power as the capacity of actors (whether individual or collective) to influence other actors’ normative and cognitive beliefs through the use of ideational elements, and – based on insights from the discursive institutionalist literature – suggests three different types of ideational power: power through ideas, understood as the capacity of actors to persuade other actors to accept and adopt their views through the use of ideational elements; power over ideas, meaning the imposition of ideas and the power to resist the inclusion of alternative ideas into the policy-making arena; and power in ideas, which takes place through the establishing of hegemony or institutions imposing constraints on what ideas are considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Selections from the prison notebooks
Gramsci, A. (2020) · The Applied Theatre Reader · doi:10.4324/9780429355363-27 · Cited by 9,750
International Norm Dynamics and Political Change
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081898550789 · Cited by 8,292
Social Theory of International Politics
Wendt, A. (1999) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612183 · Cited by 7,664
Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain
Hall, P. A. (1993) · Comparative Politics · doi:10.2307/422246 · Cited by 7,369
Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis
Pierson, P. (2004) · doi:10.1515/9781400841080 · Cited by 4,957
HISTORICAL INSTITUTIONALISM IN COMPARATIVE POLITICS
Thelen, K. (1999) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369 · Cited by 3,409
Power and International Relations
Baldwin, D. A. (2013) · Handbook of International Relations · doi:10.4135/9781446247587.n11 · Cited by 133
Cited by
Avelino, F. (2017) · Environmental Policy and Governance · doi:10.1002/eet.1777 · Cited by 432
Powerful rules governing the euro: the perverse logic of German ideas
Matthijs, M. (2016) · Journal of European Public Policy · doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1115535 · Cited by 293
Europe's Crisis of Legitimacy: Governing by Rules and Ruling by Numbers in the Eurozone
Schmidt, V. A. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198797050.001.0001 · Cited by 293
Self-citation‘Feeding 9 billion people’: global food security debates and the productionist trap
Fouilleux, E., Bricas, N., & Alpha, A. (2017) · Journal of European Public Policy · doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1334084 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A.
- Venue
- Journal of European Public Policy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-12-23
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 318-337
- ISSN
- 1350-1763 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4429
- OpenAlex
- W2218087031
- Cited by
- 693
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 211.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Power through, over and in ideas: conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534
- The paper
- Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2016). Power through, over and in ideas: conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.