Cited by 3,409Political Science Research and EducationQualitative Comparative Analysis ResearchSocial Policy and Reform Studies

HISTORICAL INSTITUTIONALISM IN COMPARATIVE POLITICS

Thelen, Kathleen·1999·Annual Review of Political Science

Abstract

▪ Abstract This article provides an overview of recent developments in historical institutionalism. First, it reviews some distinctions that are commonly drawn between the “historical” and the “rational choice” variants of institutionalism and shows that there are more points of tangency than typically assumed. However, differences remain in how scholars in the two traditions approach empirical problems. The contrast of rational choice's emphasis on institutions as coordination mechanisms that generate or sustain equilibria versus historical institutionalism's emphasis on how institutions emerge from and are embedded in concrete temporal processes serves as the foundation for the second half of the essay, which assesses our progress in understanding institutional formation and change. Drawing on insights from recent historical institutional work on “critical junctures” and on “policy feedbacks,” the article proposes a way of thinking about institutional evolution and path dependency that provides an alternative to equilibrium and other approaches that separate the analysis of institutional stability from that of institutional change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thelen, K.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Thelen, Kathleen
Venue
Annual Review of Political Science
Published
1999-06
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
369-404
ISSN
  • 1094-2939 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-1577
OpenAlex
W3151872007
Cited by
3,409
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 144 · 2025: 130 · 2024: 231 · 2023: 166 · 2022: 146 · 2021: 147 · 2020: 207 · 2019: 178 · 2018: 190 · 2017: 115 · 2016: 142 · 2015: 143 · 2014: 161 · 2013: 125 · 2012: 131
FWCI
56.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Political Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
Keywords
historical institutionalism, rational choice institutionalism, institutional formation, institutional change, critical junctures, policy feedback, path dependence, institutional evolution, institutional stability, equilibrium analysis, coordination mechanisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review