CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 224

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluating the effects of environmental education programming on connectedness to nature

Ernst, Julie, Theimer, Stefan·2011·Environmental Education Research
DOI 10.1080/13504622.2011.565119
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

With a growing movement to re-connect children to nature, an understanding of the ability of environmental education (EE) programs to foster connectedness to nature is needed. The purpose of this exploratory quantitative study is to determine the effect of seven EE programs on participants' connectedness to nature. Results from the 385 children who participated in this study suggest two of the programs may be associated with a significant increase in connectedness to nature; however, due to the limitations of the study and a potential ‘ceiling effect’ of high initial levels of connectedness, further research is needed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13504622.2011.565119

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mainstream environmental education approaches have grounded their teaching in the non-human world, with the aim of living in it sustainably.

    “Mainstream environmental education approaches have grounded their teaching in the non-human world, with the aim of living in it sustainably”

    From An African-centred approach to land education (2014) · cites this paper as Ernst and Theimer 2011

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1080/00958969809599114 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/00958969909598628 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/13504620701581539 · DOI
  4. Clayton S., 2003, Identity and the natural environment, 10.7551/mitpress/3644.001.0001 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/089419200403848 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.10.002 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.11.001 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/00958964.1980.9941381 · DOI
  9. Hungerford H.R., 1990, Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 8, 10.1080/00958964.1990.10753743 · DOI
  10. 10.1006/jevp.2001.0226 · DOI
  11. 10.1177/00139169921972056 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/13504620220145401 · DOI · Paper page
  13. LaHart D.E., 1978, The influence of knowledge on young people's perceptions about wildlife (Final project report to the National Wildlife Federation)
  14. Leopold A., 1966, A sand county almanac: With essays on conservation from round river
  15. Louv R., 2005, Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder
  16. 10.1080/09575140701594400 · DOI
  17. Mayer F.S., 2004, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Monroe M., 2003, Human Ecology Review, 10, 113
  19. 10.1080/01490409409513214 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/00958964.1994.9941954 · DOI
  21. 2007, NCTC Journal, 2
  22. Nisbet E., 2008, Environment & Behavior, 41, 715, 10.1177/0013916508318748 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1080/00958964.1993.9943500 · DOI
  24. Pedhazur E., 1991, Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach
  25. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.03.003 · DOI
  26. Peterson, N. 1982. “Developmental variables affecting environmental sensitivity in professional environmental educators”. Southern llIinois University at Carbondale. Unpublished Master's thesis
  27. Peterson N., 1981, Current issues in environmental education and environmental studies, 111
  28. 10.1023/B:BTTJ.0000047603.37042.33 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/13504620120065230 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/0022-4537.00174 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0_4 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00022-7 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00210.x · DOI
  34. 10.1080/00958964.1986.9941408 · DOI
  35. 10.1080/13504620220128220 · DOI
  36. 10.1080/1350462990050206 · DOI
  37. Sward L., 2005, Essential readings in environmental education,, 301
  38. 10.1080/00958964.1980.9941386 · DOI
  39. 1978, Final report: Intergovernmental conference on environmental education
  40. US Forest Service Press Office. June 10 2009. “US Forest Service and Ad Council launch national campaign to re-connect children with nature”. June 10, www2.prnewswire.com/mnr/adcouncil/38724/(accessed May 24, 2010)
  41. 10.1080/13504620701430331 · DOI
  42. 10.1080/00958960109598658 · DOI
  43. Wells N., 2006, Children, Youth and Environments, 16, 1, 10.1353/cye.2006.0031 · DOI
  44. Westervelt M.O., 1985, Youth and wildlife: The beliefs and behaviors of fifth and sixth grade students regarding nondomestic animals (Report to the US Fish and Wildlife Service, Document No. 498-443-42425)
  45. 10.1080/00958969909598627 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ernst, J., & Theimer, S.
Venue
Environmental Education Research
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2011-10
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
577-598
ISSN
  • 1350-4622
  • 1469-5871
DOI
10.1080/13504622.2011.565119
Cited by
224
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review