The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Muskrat theories, tobacco in the streets, and living Chicago as Indigenous land
Abstract
In this paper, we aim to contribute to ongoing work to uncover the ways in which settler colonialism is entrenched and reified in educational environments and explore lessons learned from an urban Indigenous land-based education project. In this project, we worked to re-center our perceptual habits in Indigenous cosmologies, or land-based perspectives, and came to see land re-becoming itself. Through this recentering, we unearthed some ways in which settler colonialism quietly operates in teaching and learning environments and implicitly and explicitly undermines Indigenous agency and futurity by maintaining and reifying core dimensions of settler colonial relations to land. We describe examples in which teachers and community members explicitly re-engaged land-based perspectives in the design and implementation of a land-based environmental science education that enabled epistemological and ontological centering that significantly impacted learning, agency, and resilience for urban Indigenous youth and families. In this paper, we explore the significance of naming and the ways in which knowledge systems are mobilized in teaching and learning environments in the service of settler futurity. However, we suggest working through these layers of teaching and learning by engaging in land-based pedagogies is necessary to extend and transform the possibilities and impacts of environmental education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native
Wolfe, P. (2006) · Journal of Genocide Research · doi:10.1080/14623520601056240 · Cited by 6,491 · cited 4×
“The process of erasure and sustained symbolic presence codifies a binary logic often taking the form of ‘virtuous settler’ and ‘dysfunctional native’ (Wolfe 2006) or the historicized ‘Ecological Indian’ (Friedel 2011) which underpins the structure of settler identity and is often encoded in learning environments.”
BackgroundInfluentialCultural mosaics and mental models of nature
Bang, M., Medin, D. L., & Atran, S. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0706627104 · Cited by 353
Self-citation
Cited by
Place-based education – a systematic review of literature
Yemini, M., Engel, L., & Ben Simon, A. (2025) · Educational Review · doi:10.1080/00131911.2023.2177260 · Cited by 268
Bang, M., Faber, L., Gurneau, J., Marin, A., & Soto, C. (2016) · Mind, Culture, and Activity · doi:10.1080/10749039.2015.1087572 · Cited by 239
Self-citationLees, A., Tropp Laman, T., & Calderón, D. (2021) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405841.2021.1911482 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Bang, M., Curley, L., Kessel, A., Marin, A., Suzukovich, E. S., & Strack, G.
- Venue
- Environmental Education Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-01-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-55
- ISSN
- 1350-4622 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5871
- OpenAlex
- W1975437296
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 47.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Muskrat theories, tobacco in the streets, and living Chicago as Indigenous land. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13504622.2013.865113
- The paper
- Bang, M., Curley, L., Kessel, A., Marin, A., Suzukovich, E. S., & Strack, G. (2014). Muskrat theories, tobacco in the streets, and living Chicago as Indigenous land. Environmental Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.865113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.