Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 239

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Competition in visual working memory for control of search

Downing, Paul, Dodds, Chris·2004·Visual Cognition

Abstract

Recent perspectives on selective attention posit a central role for visual working memory (VWM) in the top‐down control of attention. According to the biased‐competition model (Desimone & Duncan, 1995), active maintenance of an object in VWM gives matching (Downing, 2000) or related (Moores, Laiti, & Chelazzi, 2003) objects in the environment a competitive advantage over other objects in gaining access to limited processing resources. Participants in this study performed a visual search task while simultaneously maintaining a second item in VWM. On half of the trials, this item appeared as a distractor item in the search array. We found no evidence that this item interferes with successful selection of the search target, as measured with response time in a target detection task and accuracy in a target discrimination task. These results are consistent with two general models: One in which a representation of the current task biases the competition between items in a unitary VWM, or one in which VWM is fractionated to allow for maintenance of critical items that are not immediately relevant to the task.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13506280344000446

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 239

Metadata

Authors
Downing, P., & Dodds, C.
Venue
Visual Cognition
Published
2004-08
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
689-703
ISSN
  • 1350-6285 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0716
OpenAlex
W2040643378
Cited by
239
References
0
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competition in visual working memory for control of search. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13506280344000446
The paper
Downing, P., & Dodds, C. (2004). Competition in visual working memory for control of search. Visual Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280344000446

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.