The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Competition in visual working memory for control of search
Abstract
Recent perspectives on selective attention posit a central role for visual working memory (VWM) in the top‐down control of attention. According to the biased‐competition model (Desimone & Duncan, 1995), active maintenance of an object in VWM gives matching (Downing, 2000) or related (Moores, Laiti, & Chelazzi, 2003) objects in the environment a competitive advantage over other objects in gaining access to limited processing resources. Participants in this study performed a visual search task while simultaneously maintaining a second item in VWM. On half of the trials, this item appeared as a distractor item in the search array. We found no evidence that this item interferes with successful selection of the search target, as measured with response time in a target detection task and accuracy in a target discrimination task. These results are consistent with two general models: One in which a representation of the current task biases the competition between items in a unitary VWM, or one in which VWM is fractionated to allow for maintenance of critical items that are not immediately relevant to the task.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Interactions between attention and working memory
Awh, E., Vogel, E. K., & Oh, S.-H. (2006) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.08.023 · Cited by 883
Different states in visual working memory: when it guides attention and when it does not
Olivers, C. N. L., Peters, J., Houtkamp, R., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.004 · Cited by 678
Olivers, C. N. L., Meijer, F., & Theeuwes, J. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.5.1243 · Cited by 572
Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.2.363 · Cited by 381
A new look at novelty effects: guiding search away from old distractors
Yang, H., Chen, X., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2009) · Attention, Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/app.71.3.554 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Downing, P., & Dodds, C.
- Venue
- Visual Cognition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 689-703
- ISSN
- 1350-6285 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0716
- OpenAlex
- W2040643378
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competition in visual working memory for control of search. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13506280344000446
- The paper
- Downing, P., & Dodds, C. (2004). Competition in visual working memory for control of search. Visual Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280344000446
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.