The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Party systems in post-communist Central Europe: Patterns of stability and consolidation
Abstract
When eight former communist countries joined the European Union in 2004 it was accepted that they all had reasonably well-established democratic systems. The extent to which this also meant that they had a range of political parties that cohered into anything like a stable party system was less clear, however. Different views have been expressed on this question, and it may also be queried how well current views of what the concept of party system implies fit with Central European (CE) developments. Investigation into the nature of the party systems that have developed after four free elections is first conducted in terms of their shape and size. From this perspective only Hungary and the Czech Republic have developed anything like a two-party system. The question of stable party representation in CE legislatures is then raised, and in this context Slovenia and Estonia show signs of party system development on a more plural basis. Stronger evidence of institutionalization is derived from calculation of an Index of Party Stabilization, which confirms the higher level of development in the countries identified above. There are some signs, as yet inconclusive, that weak party systems are also associated with more negative democratization outcomes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Party institutionalization is highlighted as a means for channeling the interests of social groups, promoting actors and attitudes supportive of democracy, and facilitating credible commitments (e.g., Mainwaring and Torcal 2006; Ufen 2008; Lewis 2006).”
From Parties, Civil Society, and the Deterrence of Democratic Defection (2020) · cites this paper as Lewis 2006
Citations
Cited by
Herman, L. E. (2015) · European Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s1755773914000472 · Cited by 113
“Subsequently, it developed viable parties that alternated regularly around two main party blocs until 2010, displaying one of the most institutionalized party systems in the region (Olson, 1998; Sikk, 2005; Lewis, 2006; Casal Bértoa and Mair, 2010).”
BackgroundResultParties, Civil Society, and the Deterrence of Democratic Defection
Bernhard, M., Hicken, A., Reenock, C., & Lindberg, S. I. (2020) · Studies in Comparative International Development · doi:10.1007/s12116-019-09295-0 · Cited by 105
“…as well as the stability of democracy.3 Party institutionalization is highlighted as a means for channeling the interests of social groups, promoting actors and attitudes supportive of democracy, and facilitating credible commitments (e.g., Mainwaring and Torcal 2006; Ufen 2008; Lewis 2006).”
BackgroundEmanuele, V., Chiaramonte, A., & Soare, S. C. (2018) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1017/gov.2018.25 · Cited by 101
The volatility of volatility: Measuring change in party vote shares
Bértoa, F. C., Deegan‐Krause, K., & Haughton, T. (2017) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2017.09.007 · Cited by 87
“The rapid changes in the vote shares of parties in Central Europe are unusual by traditional Western Europe standards (Lane and Ersson, 2007; Lewis, 2006; Millard, 2004; Tavits 2005, 2008), but they are not notably different from those of Latin America, Africa and Asia and or indeed from recent…”
BackgroundAndrews, J. T., & Bairett, R. L. (2013) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2013.06.002 · Cited by 86
Party system closure and openness
Bértoa, F. C., & Enyedi, Z. (2014) · Party Politics · doi:10.1177/1354068814549340 · Cited by 92
“Indices that reflect the concentration of votes or the ideological distribution of political parties (Krupavicius 1999), the affiliation strategies of politicians and voters (Kreuzer and Pettai, 2003), the difference in vote share between the two largest parties (Birch, 2003), or the progressive enhancement of the pro…”
BackgroundPolitical parties or party systems? Assessing the ‘myth’ of institutionalisation and democracy
Bértoa, F. C. (2016) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402382.2016.1216921 · Cited by 85
“…one of the most repeated assumptions in the democratization literature, such close relationship between institutionalization and democracy has never been proved beyond a myriad of countries (Johnson, 2002; Mainwaring, 1999; Markowski, 2001) and/or regional (Lewis, 2006; Kneuer, 2011) studies.”
BackgroundInfluentialNetworks and Institutions in Europe's Emerging Markets
Schoenman, R. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139381628 · Cited by 75
Party System Closure: Party Alliances, Government Alternatives, and Democracy in Europe
Bértoa, F. C., & Enyedi, Z. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198823605.001.0001 · Cited by 75
Surviving the Storm: Factors Determining Party Survival in Central and Eastern Europe
Deegan‐Krause, K., & Haughton, T. (2018) · East European Politics and Societies and Cultures · doi:10.1177/0888325417728773 · Cited by 71
Post-Communist Politics: On the Divergence (and/or Convergence) of East and West
Bértoa, F. C. (2013) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1017/gov.2013.9 · Cited by 67
Party Systems and Government Stability in Central and Eastern Europe
Grotz, F., & Weber, T. (2012) · World Politics · doi:10.1017/s0043887112000196 · Cited by 66
Europeanization and political parties
Ladrech, R. (2009) · Living Reviews in European Governance · doi:10.12942/lreg-2009-1 · Cited by 65
A bottleneck model of e-voting: Why technology fails to boost turnout
Vassil, K., & Weber, T. (2011) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444811405807 · Cited by 67
“…15 years of the first free elections after the fall of communism, Estonia had not only joined the European Union and become a consolidated democracy with presentable levels of turnout and party system stability (Lewis, 2006), but it has also emerged as the global front-runner in voting technology.”
BackgroundComparative Party System Analysis in Central and Eastern Europe: the Case of the Baltic States
Saarts, T. (2025) · Studies of transition states and societies · doi:10.58036/stss.v3i3.86 · Cited by 64
Democracies Adrift: How the European Crises Affect East-Central Europe
Brusis, M. (2016) · Problems of Post-Communism · doi:10.1080/10758216.2016.1201772 · Cited by 61
Negative Agenda Control and Executive–Legislative Relations in East Central Europe, 1997–2008
Zubek, R. (2011) · Journal of Legislative Studies · doi:10.1080/13572334.2011.574025 · Cited by 54
“Source: The first figure in parentheses denotes the Lewis (2006) score of party stability; the other score is that of the Laakso and Taagepera index calculated based on data from Rose and Munro (2009) for seat shares of party lists that returned deputies to the legislature.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialParties, regime and cleavages: explaining party system institutionalisation in East Central Europe
Bértoa, F. C. (2012) · East European Politics · doi:10.1080/21599165.2012.720569 · Cited by 52
Coalition Government and Committee Power
Zubek, R. (2015) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402382.2015.1045322 · Cited by 45
“…and EU accession.3 But, while the states studied here have many similarities, they also show interesting variation on a key variable for this study – the type of government – a variation which is due to differential trajectories in party system development (Kitschelt et al. 1999; Lewis 2006).”
BackgroundBértoa, F. C. (2018) · European Politics and Society · doi:10.1080/23745118.2018.1557446 · Cited by 36
Nikolenyi, C. (2011) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402382.2011.555986 · Cited by 33
Die politischen Systeme Osteuropas im Vergleich
Ismayr, W. (2009) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-91997-3_1 · Cited by 28
Bakke, E. W., & Sitter, N. (2021) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0195-631020210000035003 · Cited by 27
Persistence and decline of political parties: the case of Estonia
Saarts, T. (2015) · East European Politics · doi:10.1080/21599165.2015.1036035 · Cited by 27
“There has been no constant flux of new parties into the party system like in several other CEE countries, and the vote share of new parties has been relatively low (Lewis 2006; Pettai, Auers, and Ramonaitė 2011).”
BackgroundResultAuers, D. (2018) · Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/s40647-018-0231-1 · Cited by 23
Party and Party System Institutionalization: Which Comes First?
Bértoa, F. C., Enyedi, Z., & Mölder, M. (2023) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592723002530 · Cited by 26
“In the analyses of party politics, PI and PSI are often collapsed into a combined fuzzy syndrome (e.g., Kreuzer and Pettai 2003; Lewis 2006; Meleshevich 2007; Moser 1999; Rose and Mackie 1988; Shabad and S ł omczy ń ski 1999).”
BackgroundThe impact of political parties and coalition building on Tunisia's democratic future
Brody-Barre, A. G. (2012) · The Journal of North African Studies · doi:10.1080/13629387.2012.742365 · Cited by 20
“Political parties are important players in democratic regimes, but the system they create – both the number of parties and their ‘shape’, or relative strength – also provides useful information about the political systems in which they reside, be they stable or developing (Lewis 2006).”
BackgroundBochsler, D. (2009) · Politics & Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1747-1346.2009.00196.x · Cited by 20
Morgan-Collins, M., & Meyer‐Sahling, J. (2020) · East European Politics · doi:10.1080/21599165.2020.1781096 · Cited by 18
“Moreover, party stability has long been regarded as low in many countries in the region (Casal Bértoa and Enyedi 2017; Lewis 2006).”
BackgroundAll Fall Down? The Prospects for Established Parties in Europe and Beyond
Hanley, S. (2015) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1017/gov.2015.3 · Cited by 17
A study of youth political participation in Poland and Romania
Robertson, F. (2009) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 19
Party System Institutionalisation in New Democracies of Latin America, Europe and Asia
Concha, O., & Alberto, E. (2015) · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) · Cited by 16
Institutional Subsystems and the Survival of Democracy: Do Political and Civil Society Matter?Preprint
Bernhard, M. H., Hicken, A. D., Reenock, C. M., & Lindberg, S. I. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2613824 · Cited by 15
“While party system institutionalization may not be necessary for the democratic consolidation (Toka 1997; Markowski 2001) the presence of institutionalized parties seems to increase the chance of democratic consolidation (Dix 1992; McGuire 1997; Wallis 2003; Lewis 2006) and decrease the chance of democratic breakdown…”
BackgroundNakrošis, V., & Gudžinskas, L. (2012) · NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy · doi:10.2478/v10110-012-0007-y · Cited by 13
Resisting Abusive Legalism: Electoral Fairness and the Partisan Commitment to Political Pluralism
Herman, L. E., & Muirhead, R. (2020) · Representation · doi:10.1080/00344893.2020.1744701 · Cited by 15
“…displayed the most institutionalised party system in CEE, with strong elite competition and regular alternation between two main parties, and a robust institutional framework compared with other countries in the region (Casal Bértoa & Mair, 2010; Grzymala-Busse, 2007; Lewis, 2006; Sikk, 2005).”
Party System Changes and Challenges to Democracy
Fink‐Hafner, D. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-54949-6 · Cited by 9
Regierungskoalitionen: Bildung und Dauerhaftigkeit
Grotz, F., & Weber, T. (2011) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-93217-0_10 · Cited by 10
The Department of Political and Social Sciences
Mair, P. (2009) · EUI Review · Cited by 8
Electoral systems, ethnic cleavages and experience with democracy
Raymond, C. D., Huelshoff, M. G., & Rosenblum, M. R. (2015) · International Political Science Review · doi:10.1177/0192512115596368 · Cited by 8
Towards a better understanding of organized interests in Central and Eastern Europe
Riedel, R., & Dobbins, M. (2021) · Interest Groups & Advocacy · doi:10.1057/s41309-021-00137-w · Cited by 9
“1999; Lewis 2006; McAllister and White 2007; Grzymała-Busse 2003; Hanley and Sikk 2016; Enyedi and Bértoa 2018), we still know comparably little about the interconnections between interest organizations and the political system.”
BackgroundRivera, A. M. A., & Vassil, K. (2015) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/28077 · Cited by 6
Legislatures and Policy Uncertainty: Evidence from East Central Europe
Zubek, R., & Stecker, C. (2010) · Journal of Public Policy · doi:10.1017/s0143814x09990225 · Cited by 6
Lassila, J., & Nizhnikaŭ, R. (2022) · Journal of Eurasian Studies · doi:10.1177/18793665221116128 · Cited by 6
“…& Madlovics, 2020); political party development (Ishiyama & Kennedy, 2001); the (previous) regime type (Ishayama, 1995; Fish, 2006); the presence of identity and ethnolinguistic divisions (Wilson, 1997); as well as advances in nation-building (Wilson, 2002) and democratization (Lewis, 2006).”
BackgroundEconomy and political distrust: Explaining public anti-partyism in the Czech Republic
Havlík, V. (2020) · Human Affairs · doi:10.1515/humaff-2020-0007 · Cited by 5
“In the Czech Republic, the party system stabilized, coming to resemble its Western European counterparts (Bakke & Sitter, 2005; Lewis, 2006; Tavits, 2008).”
BackgroundParty system nationalization in Estonia
Lanko, D. A., & Сергеевна, Л. И. (2020) · Baltic Region · doi:10.5922/2079-8555-2020-1-2 · Cited by 4
Party system closure and the liberal dimension of democracy: a double-edged sword
Mölder, M., Enyedi, Z., & Bértoa, F. C. (2022) · Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica · doi:10.1017/ipo.2022.22 · Cited by 4
“In party systems that follow no established patterns of behavior and produce ad hoc governments, it could be the case that patronage is the only factor that keeps coalitions together (Lewis, 2006; O ’ Dwyer, 2006).”
Party Politics in Central and Eastern Europe
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315875330 · Cited by 4
Party nationalization following democratization: modelling change in turbulent times
Mustillo, T. M. (2017) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2016.1253556 · Cited by 4
Introduction: An Analytical Framework for Studying Territoriality of the Vote in Eastern Europe
Schakel, A. H., & Dandoy, R. (2017) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-51787-6_1 · Cited by 4
“Elections are often considered to be one of the core institutions of democracy (Bunce and Wolchik 2009), and therefore it is not surprising that scholars have taken up an interest in electoral dynamics in postcommunist countries (Bakke and Sitter 2005; Lewis 2006; Olson 1998) and competitive elections taking place in…”
BackgroundDawson, J., Herman, L. E., & Ananda, A. (2025) · Problems of Post-Communism · doi:10.1080/10758216.2024.2447301 · Cited by 3
“…in this context that Hungary was often lauded for the “institutionalization” of its party system given the peaceful handovers between alternating governments of the two main party blocs (Grzymala-Busse 2007; Lewis 2006; Sikk 2005), at least until Viktor Orbán’s “constitutional revolution” in 2010.”
Party Agency and the Religious—Secular Cleavage in Post-Communist Countries: The Case of Romania
Raymond, C. D. (2013) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12061 · Cited by 4
“These weak political parties have, in turn, led to high electoral volatility (Tavits, 2005, 2008b; Lewis, 2006; Epperly, 2011), with many parties competing in only one or two elections (Sikk, 2005).”
BackgroundViera, Ž. (2015) · Baltic Journal of Law & Politics · doi:10.1515/bjlp-2015-0020 · Cited by 3
“In a comparative perspective, the party was unique also in its communication, because the politicians dominantly communicated via the internet and new social media.(19) The dominant themes of this new party were economic questions, but to encourage more votes the party also opened “hidden” questions that were covered…”
BackgroundGrotz, F., & Weber, T. (2009) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-91955-3_31 · Cited by 3
How green is my party? Programmatic stances towards environmental protection in Europe
Grzymała-Busse, A. M., Jabkowski, P., & Baranowski, M. (2025) · Party Politics · doi:10.1177/13540688251362003 · Cited by 2
“In the 1990s, CEE party systems were also more fragmented and less ideologically cohesive due to rapid transitions from au-thoritarianism to democracy, and the subsequent economic and social transitions (cf., Casal B´ertoa, 2012; Coman, 2015; Grotz and Weber, 2016; Lewis, 2006; Toole, 2000).”
Gayvoronsky, Y. (2014) · The Journal of Political Theory Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics Politeia · doi:10.30570/2078-5089-2014-73-2-141-154 · Cited by 2
Constitutional Conventions in Central Europe: Presidents in Government Formation Process
Brunclík, M., & Kubát, M. (2021) · Problems of Post-Communism · doi:10.1080/10758216.2021.1942067 · Cited by 2
“Fifth, all three countries have been characterized by frequent changes of their party systems with occasional periods of relative stability (e.g. Grotz and Weber 2012; Lewis 2006; Toole 2000).”
BackgroundELECTORAL SYSTEM IN POLAND: REVISION AND PROPOSAL OF MODIFICATION BASED ON BIPROPORTIONALITY
González, V. R., Márquez, B. L. D., & Carmona, A. L. (2015) · Representation · doi:10.1080/00344893.2015.1056217 · Cited by 2
Parteiensysteme: Interaktionsmuster und Konsolidierungsgrad
Tiemann, G. (2011) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-93217-0_7 · Cited by 1
Party system institutionalization and the quality of democracy in eastern Europe
Bértoa, F. C. (2009) · Cited by 1
Gudžinskas, L., & Bekišas, T. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-40858-9_8 · Cited by 1
Spatial analysis of Lithuanian youth turnout: Results of 2016-2020 parliamentary elections
Vidzbelis, D., & Burneika, D. (2023) · Geographia Polonica · doi:10.7163/gpol.0255 · Cited by 1
Elite- or mass-driven democratic consolidation? Western Balkans in comparative perspective
Stojanova, A. (2013) · IMT Institutional Repository (IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca) · doi:10.13118/stojanova-ana_phd2013 · Cited by 1
The European Union and party politics in Central Europe
Lewis, P. G. (2007) · Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) · Cited by 1
Self-citationParty System Institutionalization in Democracies
Mainwaring, S. P., Bizzarro, F., Watanabe, A., & Negri, M. V. D. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199756223-0248 · Cited by 1
New Parties' Effects on the Instability of Coalition Governments in East-Central Europe
Nakada-Amiya, M., & Narihiro, T. (2015) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)
Jaye, N. (2013) · CFA Magazine · doi:10.2469/cfm.v24.n5.11
Regionalism and Multi-Level Party Competition in Ukraine in 2005-2012
Romanova, V., & Podolian, O. (2012)
How Institutionalized are the Post-Communist Party Systems?
Bértoa, F. C., & Mair, P. (2010)
Las ampliaciones de la Unión Europea hacia Europa del Este: impacto político, económico y social
Rodríguez, P. M. (2017) · Nómadas Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas · doi:10.5209/noma.56125
Suárez, P. M. R., & Ángel, G. L. (2018) · OASIS · doi:10.18601/16577558.n28.07
“En relación con los miembros de la UE que se ubican geográficamente en Escandinavia (Suecia, Dinamarca y Finlandia), alrededor del 95% de la opinión pública expresa su confianza hacia las instituciones políticas de sus países (Lewis, 2006, p. 87).”
BackgroundÖst är öst och väst är väst? En jämförande studie av partisystemens stabilitet i Europa 2008–2019
Bågenholm, A. (2020) · Nordisk øst-forum/Nordisk østforum · doi:10.23865/noros.v34.2197
“…partipolitiska turbulensen i »Öst»1 visar inga tecken på avmattning och skiljer sig därmed markant från utvecklingen i »Väst», som under lång tid kännetecknats av stabilitet och kontinuitet (se till exempel Lewis, 2006; Mair, 1997; Bågenholm & Johansson Heinö, 2013; Haughton & Deegan-Krause, 2015).”
BackgroundBértoa, F. C., & Enyedi, Z. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198823605.003.0007
The Whole Is More than the Sum of the Parts
Bértoa, F. C., & Enyedi, Z. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198823605.003.0008
Bértoa, F. C., & Enyedi, Z. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198823605.003.0009
The Logic of Inter-Party Competition and Cooperation
Bértoa, F. C., & Enyedi, Z. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198823605.003.0002
Bértoa, F. C., & Enyedi, Z. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198823605.003.0010
Bértoa, F. C., & Enyedi, Z. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198823605.003.0013
Bértoa, F. C., & Enyedi, Z. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198823605.003.0001
Currently Functioning European Party Systems
Bértoa, F. C., & Enyedi, Z. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198823605.003.0004
A New European Dataset and the Measurement of Party System Closure
Bértoa, F. C., & Enyedi, Z. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198823605.003.0003
The Explanatory Model of Closure
Bértoa, F. C., & Enyedi, Z. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198823605.003.0011
Party System Closure in Comparative Perspective
Bértoa, F. C., & Enyedi, Z. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198823605.003.0006
Historical (i.e. Defunct) European Party Systems
Bértoa, F. C., & Enyedi, Z. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198823605.003.0005
Bértoa, F. C., & Enyedi, Z. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198823605.003.0012
The Issue of Institutionalization of Political Parties in Post-soviet Georgia
Benashvili, M. (2020) · JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES · doi:10.52340/jds.2022.02.28
Europeanisation and Party Politics: A Review
Cachia, J. C. (2023) · Springer series in electoral politics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-23290-9_2
Relations Between Democracy and Parties
Fink‐Hafner, D. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-54949-6_3
Bértoa, F. C., & Enyedi, Z. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198823605.002.0003
Bértoa, F. C., & Enyedi, Z. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198823605.002.0008
Bértoa, F. C., & Enyedi, Z. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198823605.002.0007
Exploring the catalysts of lobbying coalitions in Central and Eastern Europe
Dobbins, M., & Labanino, R. (2024) · East European Politics · doi:10.1080/21599165.2024.2402238 · Cited by 1
“…1998; Nölke and Vliegenthart 2009) and the evolution of party systems (e.g. Enyedi and Bértoa 2018; Hanley and Sikk 2016; Kitschelt et al. 1999; Lewis 2006) in the post-communist region, we have only recently gained a greater understanding of post-communist interest group politics (see e.g.…”
A magyar többpártrendszer stabilitásának okairól 1990-2010
Tábori, F. (2024) · Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem · doi:10.15476/elte.2023.327
Zhang, Y. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5352214
Really Independent? Biographies and Typology of Non-Partisan Presidential Candidates in Europe
Drašar, M. (2025) · Politologický časopis - Czech Journal of Political Science · doi:10.5817/pc2025-3-246
“There are data about electoral volatility, party system fractionalisation (Bielasiak, 2002), the Index of party stabilisation (Lewis, 2006) or the age of political parties or party membership (Enyedi & Casal Bértoa, 2018) used.”
Kotsiuk, V., Hutsalo, L. V., Hryhorchak, I., et al. (2025) · International Journal on Culture History and Religion · doi:10.63931/ijchr.v7isi1.2.449
Mass-elite dimensions of support for the EU in Bulgaria (1989-2007)
Savkova, L. (2010) · Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex)
Kukec, M. (2026) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1017/s147567652610139x
“Although opposition parties have most commonly used this instrument in CEE (in 71 percent of cabinets), ICs have also been initiated by cabinet parties, either jointly (15 percent of cabinets) or only by a fraction of them (32 percent of cabinets).”
InfluentialBos, E. (2009) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-91955-3_34
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewis, P. G.
- Affiliations
- The Open University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Lewis, Paul G.
- ORCID
- Lewis, Paul G.
- Venue
- Democratization
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 562-583
- ISSN
- 1351-0347 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-890X
- OpenAlex
- W2022212390
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 18.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Democratization (publishedVersion)
- Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Union Policy and Governance
- Keywords
- party system, post-communist transition, Central Europe, party system stability, party system consolidation, two-party system, party institutionalization, EU accession
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.