The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Party systems in post-communist Central Europe: Patterns of stability and consolidation
Abstract
When eight former communist countries joined the European Union in 2004 it was accepted that they all had reasonably well-established democratic systems. The extent to which this also meant that they had a range of political parties that cohered into anything like a stable party system was less clear, however. Different views have been expressed on this question, and it may also be queried how well current views of what the concept of party system implies fit with Central European (CE) developments. Investigation into the nature of the party systems that have developed after four free elections is first conducted in terms of their shape and size. From this perspective only Hungary and the Czech Republic have developed anything like a two-party system. The question of stable party representation in CE legislatures is then raised, and in this context Slovenia and Estonia show signs of party system development on a more plural basis. Stronger evidence of institutionalization is derived from calculation of an Index of Party Stabilization, which confirms the higher level of development in the countries identified above. There are some signs, as yet inconclusive, that weak party systems are also associated with more negative democratization outcomes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Party institutionalization is highlighted as a means for channeling the interests of social groups, promoting actors and attitudes supportive of democracy, and facilitating credible commitments (e.g., Mainwaring and Torcal 2006; Ufen 2008; Lewis 2006).”
From Parties, Civil Society, and the Deterrence of Democratic Defection (2020) · cites this paper as Lewis 2006
Citations
Cited by
Items 101–101 of 101
Antoszewski, A. (2014) · Studia Wyborcze
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewis, P. G.
- Affiliations
- The Open University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Lewis, Paul G.
- ORCID
- Lewis, Paul G.
- Venue
- Democratization
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 562-583
- ISSN
- 1351-0347 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-890X
- OpenAlex
- W2022212390
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 18.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Democratization (publishedVersion)
- Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Union Policy and Governance
- Keywords
- party system, post-communist transition, Central Europe, party system stability, party system consolidation, two-party system, party institutionalization, EU accession
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.