Cited by 37Military Strategy and TechnologyInternational Law and Human RightsWar, Ethics, and Justification

The evolution of targeted killing practices: Autonomous weapons, future conflict, and the international order

Haas, Michael Carl, Fischer, Sophie-Charlotte·2017·Contemporary Security Policy

Abstract

This article examines the potential use of autonomous aerial weapons for targeted killing purposes and, in doing so, looks beyond the now-familiar “global war on terror.” We argue that the combination of novel capabilities with the pre-existing military-theoretical frameworks of advanced Western states, within which autonomous weapons will be embedded, may be conducive to an expansion of targeted killings to scenarios other than military counter-terrorism. The confluence of autonomous weapons and targeted killing practices may therefore lead to a further weakening of long-standing norms regulating the use of force, including in interstate scenarios. We also find that international regulation is unlikely to forestall this outcome, and that political-military insistence on centralized operational control may mitigate—but not negate—the disruptive potential of these developments. As a result, the possible consequences for the international order of an evolution of targeted killing practices along these lines should not be underestimated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13523260.2017.1336407

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haas, M. C., & Fischer, S.-C.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Haas, Michael Carl
Venue
Contemporary Security Policy
Published
2017-05-04
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
281-306
ISSN
  • 1352-3260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-8764
OpenAlex
W2742653893
Cited by
37
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Contemporary Security Policy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Military Strategy and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Law and Human Rights
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › War, Ethics, and Justification
Keywords
autonomous weapons, targeted killing, international order, counterterrorism, future of warfare, military theory, interstate conflict

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review