Cited by 19Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionMarketing and Advertising StrategiesDigital Marketing and Social Media

When you realize that big brother is watching: How informing consumers affects synced advertising effectiveness

Open access
Segijn, Claire M., Kim, Eunah, Sifaoui, Asma, Boerman, Sophie C.·2023·Journal of Marketing Communications

Abstract

New personalization technologies have made it possible to deliver personalized messages to consumers based on their offline media usage in real time, which is known as synced advertising. These developments go hand-in-hand with a rise in concerns related to consumers’ privacy. The aim of this study is to examine the effects of increasing consumer knowledge of synced advertising (SA) on resistance through critical attitudes and perceived surveillance. In two online experiments, we found that increased SA awareness and knowledge generates more critical attitudes and a greater level of perceived surveillance, which leads to more resistance to a synced ad. For consumers without prior SA experience (e.g., through education, work), providing technical information on SA is the most effective in increasing SA knowledge (both objective and subjective knowledge), but personally relevant information could help increase confidence in SA knowledge (i.e., subjective knowledge). These results advance theories of persuasion knowledge, as well as the underlying mechanism of synced advertising effects on consumer empowerment. The results contribute to literacy programs by showing what type of information could help consumers make informed decisions about this new personalization strategy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13527266.2021.2020149

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Segijn, C. M., Kim, E., Sifaoui, A., & Boerman, S. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Boerman, Sophie C.
Venue
Journal of Marketing Communications
Published
2021-12-28
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
317-338
ISSN
  • 1352-7266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4445
OpenAlex
W4200460397
Cited by
19
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Marketing Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Office of the Vice President for Research, University of Minnesota (Grant-in-Aid of Research, Artistry, and Scholarship)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
personalized advertising, consumer privacy, surveillance, consumer awareness, critical attitude, persuasion knowledge, subjective knowledge, consumer empowerment, advertising effectiveness, consumer resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review