When you realize that big brother is watching: How informing consumers affects synced advertising effectiveness
Open accessAbstract
New personalization technologies have made it possible to deliver personalized messages to consumers based on their offline media usage in real time, which is known as synced advertising. These developments go hand-in-hand with a rise in concerns related to consumers’ privacy. The aim of this study is to examine the effects of increasing consumer knowledge of synced advertising (SA) on resistance through critical attitudes and perceived surveillance. In two online experiments, we found that increased SA awareness and knowledge generates more critical attitudes and a greater level of perceived surveillance, which leads to more resistance to a synced ad. For consumers without prior SA experience (e.g., through education, work), providing technical information on SA is the most effective in increasing SA knowledge (both objective and subjective knowledge), but personally relevant information could help increase confidence in SA knowledge (i.e., subjective knowledge). These results advance theories of persuasion knowledge, as well as the underlying mechanism of synced advertising effects on consumer empowerment. The results contribute to literacy programs by showing what type of information could help consumers make informed decisions about this new personalization strategy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts
Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209380 · Cited by 3,811 · cited 8× · see citing works
“Second, the study advances theory in the field of persuasion knowledge by applying existing theories (i.e., reactance theory (Brehm and Brehm 1981) and persuasion knowledge model (Friestad and Wright 1994)) to a new context.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDevelopment of a Scale to Measure Consumer Skepticism Toward Advertising
Obermiller, C., & Spangenberg, E. R. (1998) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp0702_03 · Cited by 1,037 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…role in the effects of knowledge about SA on responses to SA, future research could investigate these evaluative dynamics further, for instance by examining the role of ad skepticism (Obermiller and Spangenberg 1998) and other attitudinal dimensions of persuasion knowledge (Boerman et al. 2018).”
BackgroundGetting Too Personal: Reactance to Highly Personalized Email Solicitations
White, T. B., Zahay, D. L., Thorbjørnsen, H., & Shavitt, S. (2008) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11002-007-9027-9 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Planning and Conducting Experimental Advertising Research and Questionnaire Design
Geuens, M., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2017) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2016.1225233 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Perceptions of Techniques Used to Personalize Messages Across Media in Real Time
Segijn, C. M., & van Ooijen, I. (2020) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2019.0682 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The validation of the Perceived Surveillance Scale
Segijn, C. M., Opree, S. J., & Van Ooijen, I. (2022) · Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2022-3-9 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationStrycharz, J., & Segijn, C. M. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114490 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationSegijn, C. M., Kim, E., & van Ooijen, I. (2024) · Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising · doi:10.1080/10641734.2024.2318711 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Segijn, C. M., Kim, E., Sifaoui, A., & Boerman, S. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Boerman, Sophie C.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Communications
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-12-28
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 317-338
- ISSN
- 1352-7266 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4445
- OpenAlex
- W4200460397
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 3.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Marketing Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Office of the Vice President for Research, University of Minnesota (Grant-in-Aid of Research, Artistry, and Scholarship)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Keywords
- personalized advertising, consumer privacy, surveillance, consumer awareness, critical attitude, persuasion knowledge, subjective knowledge, consumer empowerment, advertising effectiveness, consumer resistance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review