Israel, the Arab Spring, and the unfolding regional order in the Middle East: a strategic assessment
Abstract
Since 2011, geo-strategic interactions have exerted pressure on various political communities. In particular, uncertainty over the foreign policy intentions of new leadership elites and the nature of the unfolding regional security system in the Middle East have impacted the strategic questions Israel must answer: how can Israel rationally assess the new environment? What foreign policy approach would best serve Israel’s distinct national interests? Using insights from the levels-of-analysis framework and from the realist theory of International Relations, this article aims to explore Israel’s reading of recent regional developments and its attitudes and behaviours towards the attendant and emerging strategic challenges. The analysis reveals that the Arab Spring uprisings exacerbated the already anarchic Middle East environment, aggravating mistrust and antagonism in Israel. The urgency of the attraction of protectionism and militarism in Israel was an expression of the realist approach to Israel’s primary strategic consolidation. With time, the regional dynamic has evolved into a more predictable—but still complex—structure than it was during its early phase (2010–2013). Although there have been signs of potential regional political eruptions, other developments have promoted continuity in the Middle East, which plays to Israel’s strategic advantage.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The power capabilities of Israel outweigh those of Iran significantly.
“The power capabilities of Israel outweigh those of Iran significantly (Kaye et al., 2011; see also Amour, 2016).”
From The Aggravated Struggle for Regional Power in the Middle East: American Allies Saudi Arabia and Israel versus Iran (2020) · cites this paper as Amour, 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Beck, M. (2020) · Global Policy · doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12778 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Beck, M. (2016) · Palgrave Communications · doi:10.1057/palcomms.2016.79 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Amour, P. O.
- Affiliations
- Sakarya University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Amour, Philipp O.
- ORCID
- Amour, Philipp O.
- Venue
- British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-05-24
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 293-309
- ISSN
- 1353-0194 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-3542
- OpenAlex
- W2402256557
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 6.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East Politics and Society
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
- Keywords
- Arab Spring, Israel, Middle East regional order, Israeli foreign policy, regional security, realism, protectionism, militarism, regional instability, Arab-Israeli relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review