The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The legitimation of the clergy’s right to rule in the Iranian Constitution of 1979
Abstract
In the course of recreating a new constitution for the Islamic Republic of Iran, there were a number of crucial debates concerning legitimacy, representation, concepts of democracy, and the relations between temporal and religious power. During the discussions in the Assembly of Experts and among opposing factions in Iranian society, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini's disciples managed to establish their leader's doctrine of rule by the clergy. The outcome was a virtual coup d'etat, whereby opposition factions were fatally weakened by the Islamic Republican Party (IRP), which served as a vehicle for its members to obtain power and to implement Ayatollah Khomeini's ideology. This paper describes the institutionalization of velayat-e faqzh (Guardianship of the Jurisconsult), between the establishment of the Islamic republic in February 1979 through the period when the concept became the law of the land in December 1979. The reasons for the faq-h's ascendancy to the position of absolute leadership are explained by considering a number of essential points: Khomeini's charismatic leadership and support for velayat-e faqih; his loyalists' overpowering domination during the debates, with their manipulation of the elections and their subsequent domination of the assembly debates; the serious apprehensions and miscalculations on the part of opposition groups who failed to organize and present a united front;1 and finally, the political shrewdness of the clergy, who in neutralizing the left by including some of their demands in the constitution, helped institutionalize the faqih doctrine and assure clerical dominance even after Khomeini's death. Scholars have
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It is not without reason that Montazeri, along with the two aforementioned personalities, are known as the architects of the faqīhcentered constitution”
From Wasatiyya Discourse in Shi’i Islam: Ayatollah Montazeri and Human Rights Jurisprudence (2022) · cites this paper as Saffari 1993
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- Khomeini Imam, 1970, Velayat‐e Faqih: (Hokūmat‐e Eslami)
- Arjomand Said Amir, 1984, The Shadow of God and the Hidden Imam, 10.7208/chicago/9780226924809.001.0001 · DOI
- Enayat Hamid, 1983, Islam in the Political Process
- 1979, Enqelab‐e Eslami
- Bakhash Shaul, 1984, Reign of the Ayatollahs: Iran and the Islamic Revolution
- Menashri David, 1990, Iran: A Decade of War and Revolution
- 1979, Ayandegan
- 1979, Nameh sar‐goshadeh: Jebheh‐ye Melli be‐mellat‐e Iran
- 1979, Ayandegan
- 1979, Jomhūri‐ye Eslami
- 1979, Ayandegan
- 1979, Ayandegan
- 1979, Jomhūri‐ye Eslami
- 1979, Enqelab‐e Eslami
- 1979, Ayandegan
- Abrahamian Ervand, 1989, Radical Islam: The Iranian Mojahedin
- 1979, Ayandegan
- 1979, Enqelab‐e Eslami
- Chehabi H.E., 1990, Iranian Politics and Religious Modernism: The Liberation Movement of Iran Under the Shah and Khomeini
- 1979, Enqelab‐e Eslami
- 1985, Sūrat‐e Mashrūh‐e Mozakerat‐e Majles‐e Barrasi‐ye Neha'i‐ye Qanūn‐e Asasi‐ye Iran, 3, 376
- Sūrat‐e Mashrūh‐e Mozakerat, 54
- 1979, Enqelab‐e Eslami
- Sūrat‐e Mashrūh‐e Mozakerat, 54
- 1979, Jomhūri‐ye Eslami
- Sūrat‐e Mashrūh‐e Mozakerat, 107
- Salavati Mahmud, 1988, Mabani‐ye Feqhi‐ye Hokūmat‐ e Eslami
- 1979, Enqelab‐e Eslami
- 1979, Enqelab‐e Eslami
- Sūrat‐e Mashrūh‐e Mozakerat, 89
- Taleqani Mahmud, 1955, Tanbih al‐Umma va‐Tanzih al‐Milla
- Sūrat‐e Mashrūh‐e Mozakerat, 404
- Sūrat‐e Mashrūh‐e Mozakerat, 1086
- Madani Sayyed Jalaloddin, 1985, Hoqūq‐e Asasi dar Jomhūri‐ye Eslami‐ye Iran
- 1980, Ettela'at
- 1979, Ettela'at
- 1979, Iran Week
- 1980, Iran Week
- 1979, Ettela'at
- Ruhani Hamid, 1983, Shari'atmadari dar Dadgah‐e Tarikh
- 10.1080/00210868008701567 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0010417500010409 · DOI
- 1962, Bahsi Darbareh‐ye Marja'iyat va‐Rūhaniyat
- Ahmad Kazemi‐Moussavi , ‘The Development of the Doctrine of Vilayat‐i Faqih: The Role of Mulla Ahmad Naraqi (1185/1770–1245/1830)’ , unpublished Master's thesis, McGill University , 1983 , p. 150 .
- 1980, Ettela'at
- Iran Nehzat‐e Azadi‐ye, 1988, Velayat‐e Motlaqeh‐e Faqih
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wasatiyya Discourse in Shi’i Islam: Ayatollah Montazeri and Human Rights Jurisprudence
Ghobadzadeh, N. (2022) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel13020126 · Cited by 18
“It is not without reason that Montazeri, along with the two aforementioned personalities, are known as the architects of the faqı̄hcentered constitution (Saffari 1993, pp. 105–12; Schwerin 2015, pp. 42–64; Siavoshi 2017; Abdo 2001, p. 15).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Saffari, S.
- Corresponding author
- Saffari, Said
- Venue
- British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64-82
- ISSN
- 1353-0194 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-3542
- OpenAlex
- W1974645979
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 27 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Islamic Studies and History
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East Politics and Society
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
- Keywords
- velayat-e faqih, clerical rule, Imam Khomeini, Islamic Republic of Iran, legitimacy, religious authority, coups d'état, political representation, charismatic leadership
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review