Cited by 88Islamic Studies and HistoryMiddle East Politics and SocietyPolitics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The legitimation of the clergy’s right to rule in the Iranian Constitution of 1979

Saffari, Said·1993·British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies

Abstract

In the course of recreating a new constitution for the Islamic Republic of Iran, there were a number of crucial debates concerning legitimacy, representation, concepts of democracy, and the relations between temporal and religious power. During the discussions in the Assembly of Experts and among opposing factions in Iranian society, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini's disciples managed to establish their leader's doctrine of rule by the clergy. The outcome was a virtual coup d'etat, whereby opposition factions were fatally weakened by the Islamic Republican Party (IRP), which served as a vehicle for its members to obtain power and to implement Ayatollah Khomeini's ideology. This paper describes the institutionalization of velayat-e faqzh (Guardianship of the Jurisconsult), between the establishment of the Islamic republic in February 1979 through the period when the concept became the law of the land in December 1979. The reasons for the faq-h's ascendancy to the position of absolute leadership are explained by considering a number of essential points: Khomeini's charismatic leadership and support for velayat-e faqih; his loyalists' overpowering domination during the debates, with their manipulation of the elections and their subsequent domination of the assembly debates; the serious apprehensions and miscalculations on the part of opposition groups who failed to organize and present a united front;1 and finally, the political shrewdness of the clergy, who in neutralizing the left by including some of their demands in the constitution, helped institutionalize the faqih doctrine and assure clerical dominance even after Khomeini's death. Scholars have

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13530199308705571

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Khomeini Imam, 1970, Velayat‐e Faqih: (Hokūmat‐e Eslami)
  2. Arjomand Said Amir, 1984, The Shadow of God and the Hidden Imam, 10.7208/chicago/9780226924809.001.0001 · DOI
  3. Enayat Hamid, 1983, Islam in the Political Process
  4. 1979, Enqelab‐e Eslami
  5. Bakhash Shaul, 1984, Reign of the Ayatollahs: Iran and the Islamic Revolution
  6. Menashri David, 1990, Iran: A Decade of War and Revolution
  7. 1979, Ayandegan
  8. 1979, Nameh sar‐goshadeh: Jebheh‐ye Melli be‐mellat‐e Iran
  9. 1979, Ayandegan
  10. 1979, Jomhūri‐ye Eslami
  11. 1979, Ayandegan
  12. 1979, Ayandegan
  13. 1979, Jomhūri‐ye Eslami
  14. 1979, Enqelab‐e Eslami
  15. 1979, Ayandegan
  16. Abrahamian Ervand, 1989, Radical Islam: The Iranian Mojahedin
  17. 1979, Ayandegan
  18. 1979, Enqelab‐e Eslami
  19. Chehabi H.E., 1990, Iranian Politics and Religious Modernism: The Liberation Movement of Iran Under the Shah and Khomeini
  20. 1979, Enqelab‐e Eslami
  21. 1985, Sūrat‐e Mashrūh‐e Mozakerat‐e Majles‐e Barrasi‐ye Neha'i‐ye Qanūn‐e Asasi‐ye Iran, 3, 376
  22. Sūrat‐e Mashrūh‐e Mozakerat, 54
  23. 1979, Enqelab‐e Eslami
  24. Sūrat‐e Mashrūh‐e Mozakerat, 54
  25. 1979, Jomhūri‐ye Eslami
  26. Sūrat‐e Mashrūh‐e Mozakerat, 107
  27. Salavati Mahmud, 1988, Mabani‐ye Feqhi‐ye Hokūmat‐ e Eslami
  28. 1979, Enqelab‐e Eslami
  29. 1979, Enqelab‐e Eslami
  30. Sūrat‐e Mashrūh‐e Mozakerat, 89
  31. Taleqani Mahmud, 1955, Tanbih al‐Umma va‐Tanzih al‐Milla
  32. Sūrat‐e Mashrūh‐e Mozakerat, 404
  33. Sūrat‐e Mashrūh‐e Mozakerat, 1086
  34. Madani Sayyed Jalaloddin, 1985, Hoqūq‐e Asasi dar Jomhūri‐ye Eslami‐ye Iran
  35. 1980, Ettela'at
  36. 1979, Ettela'at
  37. 1979, Iran Week
  38. 1980, Iran Week
  39. 1979, Ettela'at
  40. Ruhani Hamid, 1983, Shari'atmadari dar Dadgah‐e Tarikh
  41. 10.1080/00210868008701567 · DOI
  42. 10.1017/S0010417500010409 · DOI
  43. 1962, Bahsi Darbareh‐ye Marja'iyat va‐Rūhaniyat
  44. Ahmad Kazemi‐Moussavi , ‘The Development of the Doctrine of Vilayat‐i Faqih: The Role of Mulla Ahmad Naraqi (1185/1770–1245/1830)’ , unpublished Master's thesis, McGill University , 1983 , p. 150 .
  45. 1980, Ettela'at
  46. Iran Nehzat‐e Azadi‐ye, 1988, Velayat‐e Motlaqeh‐e Faqih

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Saffari, S.
Corresponding author
Saffari, Said
Venue
British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies
Published
1993-01
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
64-82
ISSN
  • 1353-0194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-3542
OpenAlex
W1974645979
Cited by
88
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 27 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Islamic Studies and History
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East Politics and Society
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Keywords
velayat-e faqih, clerical rule, Imam Khomeini, Islamic Republic of Iran, legitimacy, religious authority, coups d'état, political representation, charismatic leadership

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review