The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 2 of the 44 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Wasatiyya Discourse in Shi’i Islam: Ayatollah Montazeri and Human Rights Jurisprudence
Open accessAbstract
There are significant differences of opinion about the successes and failures of Iran’s clerical government, but it can hardly be disputed that the experience has led to the flourishing of Shīʿī political thought. In the past four decades, aided by government support, extensive literature has been produced endorsing the political theology of “governmental Shīʿism” conceptualized by Khomeini in the early 1970s. Numerous other schools of thought have also emerged in opposition to the militant Shīʿī interpretation of religion by governmental Shīʿism. Using the concept of Wasatiyyah to conceptualize the most important counter-discourse to governmental Shīʿism, this article addresses the life and thought of Ayatollah Montazeri, one of the most prominent Wasatiyyah thinkers. Focusing on the issue of human rights in Montazeri’s thought, the article seeks to demonstrate how Montazeri instigated a fundamental reform of the seminary episteme, and by doing so articulated intra-religious reasoning in favor of the promotion of modern concepts such as human rights.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The article argues that Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri exemplifies a Shiʿi Wasatiyyah (moderate) counter-discourse to Khomeini’s governmental Shiʿism, reforming the seminary episteme from within to accommodate human rights. It shows how Montazeri grounded innate human dignity and rights in Qurʾānic verses, ḥadīths, and jurisprudential reasoning, becoming the first Shiʿi jurist to write a book with “human rights” in the title.
Key findings
- Montazeri is presented as a pioneering *marjaʿ-i taqlīd* of the Shiʿi Wasatiyyah school, unique because he argued entirely within the seminary episteme while promoting human rights, democracy, freedom, and pluralism; the paper calls him the first Shiʿi jurist to write a book with “human rights” in the title and the founder of human rights jurisprudence in that episteme.
- He separated human rights from religious belief, arguing that humans have inherent dignity regardless of faith, citing Qurʾānic verses such as Q 17:70 (“Verily we have honored the Children of Adam”) and Q 49:13; he held that fundamental rights—self-determination, life, livelihood, freedom of thought and expression, personal and social security—are innate, fixed, inalienable, and not rooted in legislation or government will.
- Specific positions attributed to Montazeri include opposition to the death penalty for apostasy, the principle that there should be no political prisoners, permission for temporary detention only in murder charges and only for a very limited period, rejection of torture-based confessions, a fatwa granting Bahāʾīs equal citizenship rights, and a fivefold classification of rights; he also identified religious foundations for rights to retirement pension, education, employment, and housing.
- The paper notes limits to his progressivism: he opposed women serving as judges or political leaders, defended the classical rule that women inherit half of men’s share, and did not address homosexual rights; on minorities, he argued equality in human, public, civil, criminal, and commercial rights but sought to justify restrictions on senior government posts for non-Muslims.
Methods
- Conceptual and intellectual-history analysis using the framework of Wasatiyyah, with a single case study of Ayatollah Montazeri’s life and thought focused on human rights.
- Sources are Montazeri’s own writings, fatwas, classes, memoirs, and treatises—such as *Treatise on Rights*, *Jurisprudential Foundations of the Islamic Government*, and responses to religious questions—alongside secondary scholarship; no empirical sample or quantitative analysis is used.
- The main analysis is textual and contextual: it reconstructs Montazeri’s intra-religious reasoning within the Shiʿi seminary episteme and contrasts it with Khomeinism and other Wasatiyyah thinkers.
Limitations
- The paper states that Montazeri’s extensive works cannot all be examined in one article and that it focuses on human rights; it also says separate research is needed to examine how far Wasatiyyah thinking has developed within the Shiʿi seminary.
- The paper acknowledges that Montazeri’s ideas were not fully aligned with human rights standards, that he avoided some controversial issues such as homosexual rights, and that his views on women’s rights and minorities can be subject to serious criticism; it also speculates about his reasons for avoiding certain topics.
- Evident from the text: this is a single-case conceptual study without systematic comparative or empirical measurement, relying on selected primary texts and secondary sources, so its claims about broader Shiʿi Wasatiyyah are illustrative rather than exhaustive.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
2 of 44 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Individuals such as Mohsen Kadivar, Ahmad Qabel, Mohammad Soroush Mahallati, Ayatollah Assadollah Bayat Zanjani, and numerous others present moderate readings of religion in relation to a range of matters.
“Individuals such as Mohsen Kadivar, Ahmad Qabel, Mohammad Soroush Mahallati, Ayatollah Assadollah Bayat Zanjani (Ridgeon 2020(Ridgeon , 2021;;Jahanbakhsh 2020), as well as numerous others, present moderate readings of religion in relation to a range of matters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Ridgeon 2020 source
The Introduction (p. 2) identifies Mohsen Kadivar and Ahmad Qabil as New Religious Thinkers and describes the movement’s reformist interpretations of Islam. The Introduction (p. 4) says its clerics propose reforms on a wide range of issues. Our copy does not establish that Mohammad Soroush Mahallati or Ayatollah Assadollah Bayat Zanjani present such readings; the Soroush named on p. 2 is Abdolkarim Soroush. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Ridgeon 2021 source
- cites Jahanbakhsh 2020 source
Section 2, “The Iranian Context,” identifies Mohsen Kadivar as a religious reformer working on a range of social and political topics. Section 3, “Ahmad Qabel and His Legacy,” describes Qabel’s reformist approach. Our copy does not establish the claim about Mohammad Soroush Mahallati or Ayatollah Assadollah Bayat Zanjani; the Soroush it discusses is Abdulkarim Soroush. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingreasoning
The open political atmosphere made it possible for reformists to give public lectures and air reformist debates in the classroom.
“The open political atmosphere also made it possible for reformists to give public lectures and air reformist debates in the classroom.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Montazeri's fatwas in response to Kadivar's questions inferred that Khamenei, the Supreme Leader, was an oppressive leader.
“Without naming the Leader, the fatwas issued by Montazeri in response to these questions inferred that Khamenei, the Supreme Leader, was an oppressive leader.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Shī'ī Wasatiyyah thinkers have denounced the strictness and extremism of governmental Shī'ism.
“In all these cases, it can be said that Shī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Montazeri issued a fatwa granting Bahā'īs equal rights to other citizens of Iran.
“Among these was a fatwa granting Bahā”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingreasoning
The Assembly of Experts of the Leadership appointed Montazeri as the successor to the Leader of the Islamic Republic in July 1985.
“It was for this reason that the Assembly of Experts of the Leadership appointed him as the successor to the Leader of the Islamic Republic in July 1985.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
In the Assembly of Experts, Montazeri, alongside Hassan Ayat and Ayatollah Beheshti, were the main proponents of the idea of including the principle of wilāyat-i faqīh in the constitution.
“In the Assembly of Experts, Montazeri, alongside Hassan Ayat 14 and Ayatollah Beheshti, 15 were the main proponents of the idea of including the principle of wilāyat-i faqīh in the constitution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
As designated successor to the Leader, Montazeri gradually found himself at odds with other elements of the decision-making apparatus of the Islamic Republic.
“As designated successor to the Leader, Montazeri gradually found himself at odds with other elements of the decision-making apparatus of the Islamic Republic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Particularly after 1988, Montazeri made his criticisms public.
“Particularly after 1988, Montazeri made his criticisms public”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Siavoshi 2017 source
- Findingreasoning
Montazeri used human rights issues to promote elements of democratic polity.
“This issue is beyond the scope of this article, 22 but it is worth noting that he also used human rights issues to promote elements of democratic polity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Montazeri systematically classifies rights in five categories: God's rights over humanity; a human's rights over him or herself; reciprocal rights of human beings; the rights of nations; and the rights of and between humanity, nature, and animals.
“Montazeri systematically classifies rights in five categories: (1) God's rights over humanity; (2) a human's rights over him or herself; (3) reciprocal rights of human beings in relation to each other; (4) the rights of nations in relation to each other; and (5) the rights of and between humanity, nature, and animals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Montazeri believes on principle that there should be no political prisoners.
“As for political prisoners, Montazeri believes on principle that there should be no political prisoners.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Montazeri emphasizes the need to consider the maqāsid al-sharī'a (higher objectives of Islamic law).
“Like Sunnī Wasatiyyah thinkers, Montazeri also emphasizes the need to consider the maqāsīd al-sharī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Montazeri criticized seminary scholars' submission to their predecessors.
“Montazeri himself criticized seminary scholars' submission to their predecessors, writing that:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Montazeri 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning
Montazeri sees the use of the death penalty for apostasy in the early days of Islam not as a punishment for a change of belief, but for an intention to make an attack on Islam.
“Montazeri sees the use of the death penalty for apostasy in the early days of Islam not as a punishment for a change of belief, but for an intention to make an attack on Islam.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Montazeri explicitly opposed women taking on judicial and political leadership roles.
“Montazeri, for example, explicitly opposed women taking on judicial and political leadership roles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Montazeri used religious sources to promote a democratic system.
“In relation to political matters, Montazeri also used religious sources to promote a democratic system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Montazeri is opposed to the death penalty for a person who has abandoned Islam.
“In general, he is opposed to the death penalty for a person who has abandoned Islam.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Montazeri does not consider fundamental human rights subject to the conditions of any specific time or place.
“Montazeri does not consider these rights subject to the conditions of any specific time or place:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Montazeri 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given
Montazeri defended the classical jurisprudential rule that a woman inherits half of that of a man.
“Regarding inheritance, Montazeri defends the classical jurisprudential rule that a woman inherits half of that of a man.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
According to Khomeini, if the interests of government demand it, the ruling faqīh has the right to suspend or even violate the fundamental principles of religion.
“According to him, if the interests of government demand it, the ruling faqīh has the right to suspend or even violate the fundamental principles of religion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The coming to power of the reformists created a conducive environment for this group of scholars, providing them with broader and more effective platforms to promote their ideas.
“In turn, the coming to power of the reformists created a conducive environment for this group of scholars, providing them with broader and more effective platforms to promote their ideas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This caused some religious thinkers, who had supported governmental Shī'ism during the revolution and helped to institutionalize it in the early years after the revolution, to become disillusioned.
“This caused some religious thinkers, who had supported governmental Shī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Khomeini theorized the priority of political considerations over religious principles.
“Khomeini went so far as to theorize the priority of political considerations over religious principles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Montazeri, as a marja'-i taqlīd, accommodated progressive ideas within the seminary's episteme.
“More importantly, Montazeri, as a marja”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Shī'ī seminary has an independent episteme that has set the rules for its thinkers for centuries.
- Rests on an assumption: According to the seminary episteme, individuals are duty-bound human beings and a person's rights are determined based on his or her religious beliefs.
- Interpretationreasoning
The political structure that emerged after the 1979 revolution was not necessarily the implementation of Khomeini's doctrine.
“The political structure that emerged after the 1979 revolution was not necessarily the implementation of Khomeini's doctrine.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Montazeri was able to accommodate concepts such as human rights and democracy in Shī'ī politico-religious thought using the accepted sources and methods of scholarly work in the seminary.
“was able to accommodate concepts such as human rights and democracy in Shī”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Shī'ī seminary has an independent episteme that has set the rules for its thinkers for centuries.
- Rests on an assumption: According to the seminary episteme, individuals are duty-bound human beings and a person's rights are determined based on his or her religious beliefs.
- Interpretationreasoning
Confronted by the Islamic Republic's authoritarian and repressive path, these thinkers reconsidered their views on the role of religion in the public arena.
“Confronted by the Islamic Republic's authoritarian and repressive path, they reconsidered their views on the role of religion in the public arena.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Montazeri had a unique place among Shī'ī-Iranian Wasatiyyah thinkers.
“This article argues that Montazeri had a unique place among the Shī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Montazeri made fundamental changes to the seminary episteme.
“In this article, I demonstrate that Montazeri made fundamental changes to this episteme”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Shī'ī seminary has an independent episteme that has set the rules for its thinkers for centuries.
- Rests on an assumption: According to the seminary episteme, individuals are duty-bound human beings and a person's rights are determined based on his or her religious beliefs.
- Interpretationreasoning
The claim that Shī'ī ulema in government posts moderated their views to meet the needs of the modern world is inconsistent with the way the ruling clergy have governed over the more than four decades since 1979.
“One may imagine that the Shī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The doctrine of wilāyat-i faqīh can in no way be interpreted as consistent with modern concepts such as democracy, freedom, pluralism, and tolerance.
“which can in no way be interpreted as consistent with modern concepts such as democracy, freedom, pluralism, and tolerance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The flexibilities in the ruling clergy's application of religious rules cannot be considered as signs of moderation.
“These flexibilities cannot be considered as signs of moderation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Montazeri's influential role was not a result of his official judicial position, but rather due to the fact that he was in practice the second most powerful person in the country.
“Montazeri's influential role was not a result of his official judicial position, but rather due to the fact that he was in practice the second most powerful person in the country.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Montazeri's scholarly works, despite being progressive and compatible with modern life, are conceptualized and articulated entirely within the framework of the episteme of the Shi'i seminary.
“However, more important than his role in the politics of the day is his legacy in the form of his scholarly works, which despite being progressive and compatible with the necessities of life in the modern age, are conceptualized and articulated entirely within the framework of the episteme of the Shī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It was Montazeri who recognized even more than Khomeini himself the potential of the idea of wilāyat-i faqīh.
“It was Montazeri who recognized even more than Khomeini himself the potential of the idea of wilāyat-i faqīh.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Montazeri can be considered a Wasatiyyah thinker because he emphasizes existing values in the religious tradition to support arguments in favor of human rights.
“I want to show that Montazeri can be considered a Wasatiyyah thinker because, like Khaled Abou El Fadl (Abou El Fadl 2004, 2013), one of the prominent thinkers of the Wasatiyyah school, he emphasizes existing values in the religious tradition in order to support arguments in favor of human rights.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Montazeri's ousting played a decisive role in delegitimizing governmental Shi'ism.
“Despite not posing a serious challenge to the Islamic Republic at the time, Montazeri's ousting did play a decisive role in delegitimizing governmental Shī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: As soon as Montazeri learned of Khomeini's decision, he tried unsuccessfully to prevent the 1988 mass executions.
- Rests on an assumption: The publication of Montazeri's letters to Khomeini regarding the executions led to the removal of his designation as successor to the Leader.
- Interpretationreasoning
Montazeri played a determining role in consolidating the position of the clergy in the political structure of the post-revolutionary state.
“Montazeri played a determining role in consolidating the position of the clergy in the political structure of the post-revolutionary state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Montazeri's internal challenges have greater potential to cause damage than challenges by secularists or other religious groups because they speak to the most important and influential social base of the Shi'i government.
“Such challenges have greater potential to cause damage than any challenge posed by secularists or even other religious groups because they speak to the part of society that is in fact the most important and influential social base of the Shī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The ideas of religious intellectuals and the open political and intellectual environment of the reform period had a profound impact on Montazeri's thought.
“The ideas of religious intellectuals and the open political and intellectual environment of the reform period had a profound impact on Montazeri's thought.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Montazeri, along with Hassan Ayat and Ayatollah Beheshti, are known as the architects of the faqīh-centered constitution.
“It is not without reason that Montazeri, along with the two aforementioned personalities, are known as the architects of the faqīhcentered constitution”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisereasoning
The jurisprudential approach taken by the forefathers of Shi'ism to understanding and interpreting the verses of the Qur'an and the hadiths is still dominant.
“This is true, but the problem is that the jurisprudential approach taken by the forefathers of Shī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
In the seminary's episteme, the opinions and writings of precedent Shi'i scholars play a more important and decisive role than the Qur'an and hadiths.
“In addition to the Shī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The roots and justification of Iran's discriminatory structure can be traced to a key feature of Shi'i jurisprudence according to which human beings are classified based on their beliefs.
“The roots and justification of this discriminatory structure can be traced to a key feature of Shī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kadivar 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The main factors differentiating between individuals in Shi'i jurisprudence are gender, religious belief, and the level of a person's religious knowledge and piety.
“The main factors differentiating between individuals are gender, religious belief, and the level of a person's religious knowledge and piety (Kadivar 2015, p. 225).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kadivar 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
In Shi'i jurisprudence, there are significant dissimilarities between men and women.
“In Shī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The root of human rights issues in the Islamic Republic of Iran lies in the way Shi'i jurisprudence views human beings.
“Therefore, the root of human rights issues in the Islamic Republic of Iran lies in the way Shī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Compared to other Shīʿī Wasatiyyah thinkers such as Abdul Karim Soroush, Mohsen Kadivar, and Mohammad Mojtahed Shabestari, Montazeri's views were not particularly progressive.
“It can be said that compared to other Shī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Due to Montazeri's efforts, moderate readings of religion in relation to several issues have already become part of the Shi'i seminary episteme.
“It is not unreasonable to claim that due to Montazeri's efforts, moderate readings of religion in relation to several issues have already become part of the Shī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Probably not a substantial claim. 106
- It may state two separate claims as one. 65
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
FindingreasoningThe seminary was not unaffected by this atmosphere.
“The seminary was not unaffected by this atmosphere.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenIt only took the ruling clergy a few years to remove all competing groups from the political arena.
“It only took them a few years to remove all competing groups from the political arena.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenThis intolerance was not limited to secular groups and ideologies such as communists, liberals or nationalists; Shī'ī religious groups dissenting from governmental Shī'ism were also severely repressed.
“This intolerance was not limited to secular groups and ideologies such as communists, liberals or nationalists; Shī”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningA significant number of religious intellectuals were educated in and retained close ties to the seminary, and spread moderate ideas through this forum as well.
“A significant number of religious intellectuals were educated in and retained close ties to the seminary, and spread moderate ideas through this forum as well.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
FindingreasoningOn the basis of this interpretation, many discriminatory laws have been enacted that grossly violate women's rights.
“On the basis of this interpretation, many discriminatory laws have been enacted that grossly violate women's rights.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenOver the past four decades, the Islamic Republic has imposed many social restrictions on all Iranians.
“Over the past four decades, the Islamic Republic has also imposed many social restrictions on all Iranians.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingcitationThe ruling clergy of Iran have not been strict in following religious rules; they have demonstrated pragmatism whenever needed.
“It is correct to say that the ruling clergy of Iran have not been strict in following religious rules: they have demonstrated pragmatism whenever needed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tamadonfar 2001 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenThe ruling clergy's monopoly on true Islam has been a central claim of the ruling clergy, and terms such as 'American Islam' and 'English Shī'ism' have been invented to invalidate other interpretations of the religion.
“Their monopoly on true Islam has been a central claim of the ruling clergy, and terms such as”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenThe most prominent thinkers of this movement were Abdolkarim Soroush, Mohammad Mujtahed Shabestari, Mohsen Kadivar, and Hasan Yousefi Eshkevari.
“The most prominent thinkers of this movement were Abdolkarim Soroush, Mohammad Mujtahed Shabestari, Mohsen Kadivar, and Hasan Yousefi Eshkevari-to name but a few.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenTension and rivalry have been key features of the ruling clergy's foreign policies in relation to both Muslim and non-Muslim nations.
“Not surprisingly, tension and rivalry have been key features of the ruling clergy's foreign policies in relation to both Muslim and non-Muslim nations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
FindingreasoningAfter Montazeri's ouster and with the death of Khomeini, right wing Islamists came to dominate the political arena to the extent of removing the left wing from all centers of power.
“After that, and with the death of Khomeini, right wing Islamists came to dominate the political arena to the extent of removing the left wing from all centers of power.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningEven religious intellectuals without such a background, in particular Abdolkarim Soroush, gained a strong presence in the seminary and held face-to-face debates and exchanged written arguments with many of its thinkers.
“Even religious intellectuals without a such a background, in particular Abdolkarim Soroush, gained a strong presence in the seminary and, in addition to presenting numerous lectures in the seminary, held face-toface debates and exchanged written arguments with many of its thinkers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenA new discourse emerged in the Shī'ī-Iranian world in the mid-1980s, widely referred to as religious reformism.
“A new discourse emerged in the Shī”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
FindingreasoningConcepts such as radical, extremist, violent, and hostile have been widely used to describe the political thought and behavior of Iran's ruling clergy.
“This is why concepts such as radical, extremist, violent, and hostile have been widely used to describe the political thought and behavior of Iran's ruling clergy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenIn the early years after the revolution, the ruling clergy's rise to power was accompanied by their elimination of all political rivals.
“In the early years after the revolution, the ruling clergy's rise to power was accompanied by their elimination of all political rivals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenMontazeri was ousted in 1989 from the second most-important position in the state.
“Montazeri was ousted in 1989 from the second most-important (after Khomeini) position in the state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenThere is not even a single mention of the concept of human rights in the doctrine of wilāyat-i faqīh.
“There is not even a single mention of the concept of human rights in this doctrine”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningWith the support of Khatami's reformist government, the granting of newspaper and magazine publication licenses increased sharply, and a significant proportion of the content of the resultant publication boom comprised religious reformist ideas.
“With the support of Khatami's reformist government, the granting of newspaper and magazine publication licenses increased sharply, and a significant proportion of the content of the resultant publication boom comprised religious reformist ideas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningCompared to other religious minorities, the situation of Bahā'īs is much worse; they are generally disallowed from enjoying basic citizenship rights, such as the right to education and the right to work.
“Compared to other religious minorities, the situation of Bahā”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenVarious aspects of human rights (women's rights, the rights of religious and ethnic minorities, children's rights), and the issues of freedom, religious pluralism, tolerance, and apostasy are among the key matters subject to reevaluation by Shī'ī Wasatiyyah thinkers, who have offered modern readings of each one.
“Various aspects of human rights (women's rights, the rights of religious and ethnic minorities, children's rights), and the issues of freedom, religious pluralism, tolerance, and apostasy are among the key matters subject to reevaluation by Shī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenA number of religious intellectuals, including Mohsen Kadivar and Emadeddin Baghi, were among Montazeri's students and maintained close contact with him.
“A number of religious intellectuals, including Mohsen Kadivar and Emadeddin Baghi, were among Montazeri's students and maintained close contact with him.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenBoth Montazeri and Sanei constructed their arguments entirely within the episteme of the Shī'ī seminary, played their politico-religious roles within the same framework, and never studied or taught at secular universities.
“Both of these Wasatiyyah thinkers constructed their arguments entirely within the episteme of the Shī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningBoth Montazeri and Sanei reached the highest rank in the seminary hierarchy, that is, marja'-i taqlīd, and for this reason held a high level of religious authority and prestige.
“Both reached the highest rank in the seminary hierarchy, that is, marja”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenTolerance and moderation are among the important elements that have been conceptualized in the debates of the Shī'ī Wasatiyyah thinkers.
“Tolerance and moderation are among the important elements that have been conceptualized in the debates of the Shī”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenDuring this period, Montazeri taught and published his most important jurisprudential-political work, the extensive Jurisprudential Foundations of the Islamic Government.
“In fact, it was during this period that he taught and published his most important jurisprudential-political work, the extensive Jurisprudential Foundations of the Islamic Government.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenSanei had lesser standing than Montazeri, both in terms of government appointments, scholarly position and degree of influence in the sociopolitical arena.
“Sanei had lesser standing than Montazeri, both in terms of government appointments, scholarly position and degree of influence in the sociopolitical arena.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenMontazeri was among the seminarians who instigated a series of live debates and written exchanges of views with Abdolkarim Soroush and other religious intellectuals.
“Montazeri was among the seminarians who instigated a series of live debates and written exchanges of views with Abdolkarim Soroush and other religious intellectuals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenBeyond this official post, Montazeri also founded several institutions and instituted many of the important occasions of the Islamic Republic's calendar.
“Beyond this official post, Montazeri also founded several institutions and instituted many of the important occasions of the Islamic Republic's calendar.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenMontazeri was one of Khomeini's oldest allies and played an important role in the promotion of Khomeini's ideas.
“Montazeri was one of Khomeini's oldest allies and played an important role in the promotion of Khomeini's ideas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingcitationMontazeri was particularly critical of the continuation of the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), the treatment of political prisoners, censorship of the press, and the overall management of the country.
“He was particularly critical of the continuation of the Iran-Iraq War (1980)(1981)(1982)(1983)(1984)(1985)(1986)(1987)(1988), the treatment of political prisoners, censorship of the press, and the overall management of the country.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingcitationBetween the publication of the draft constitution and the election of the Assembly of Experts for the Constitution in June and July 1979, Montazeri presented the most coherent proposal of wilāyat-i faqīh and called for its inclusion in the constitution.
“Between the publication of the draft constitution and the election of the Assembly of Experts for the Constitution in June and July 1979, Montazeri presented the most coherent proposal of wilāyat-i faqīh and called for its inclusion in the constitution”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Montazeri 1979
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Randjbar-Daemi 2013 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenBoth Montazeri and Sanei were students of Khomeini, leaders during the revolutionary struggle, and occupied senior government positions after the revolution.
“Both Montazeri and Sanei were students of Khomeini, leaders during the revolutionary struggle, and occupied senior government positions after the revolution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenMontazeri belonged to a generation of Shī'ī scholars who received their entire education in the traditional jurisprudential context, who never studied at schools or universities.
“Montazeri belonged to a generation of Shī”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenDue to his political activities and his association with Khomeini, Montazeri was imprisoned and exiled many times during the Pahlavi era.
“Due to his political activities and his association with Khomeini, Montazeri was imprisoned and exiled many times during the Pahlavi era.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
FindingcitationMontazeri, along with Morteza Motahhari, persuaded Khomeini to start teaching dars-i khārij in the 1940s.
“Montazeri, along with Morteza Motahhari, 11 persuaded Khomeini to start teaching dars-i khārij 12 in the 1940s”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Montazeri 2000a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Mo'asse-ye Tanzim va Nashr-e A'asar-e Emam 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenMontazeri had a pioneering role in identifying the potential of Khomeini's personality and ideas.
“He also had a pioneering role in identifying the potential of Khomeini's personality and ideas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenAyatollah Montazeri played an important role in the designation of Khomeini as a marja'-i taqlid.
“Ayatollah Montazeri also played an important role in the designation of Khomeini as a marja”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenIn addition to chairing the Assembly of Experts for the Constitution, Montazeri briefly served as the Friday Prayer Imam of Tehran and later became the Friday Prayer Imam of Qum.
“In addition to chairing the Assembly of Experts for the Constitution, Montazeri briefly served as the Friday Prayer Imam of Tehran and later became the Friday Prayer Imam of Qum.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenMontazeri was born in 1922 in Najafabad in central-west Iran, and entered the seminary at the age of 12, which remained the main platform for his scholarly and practical activities until the end of his life.
“He was born in 1922 in Najafabad in central-west Iran, and entered the seminary at the age of 12, which remained the main platform for his scholarly and practical activities until the end of his life.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenThe readings that Wasatiyyah thinkers have articulated shift from a focus on the apparent meaning of Qur'ānic verses and hadīths towards an emphasis on the intent and purpose of religion.
“The readings that the Wasatiyyah thinkers have articulated in relation to the aforementioned matters shift from a focus on the apparent meaning of Qur”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenEven when Montazeri was the designated successor to the Leader of the Islamic Republic (1985-1989), he was still based at the Qum seminary, and in addition to his political activity, taught at the highest level of seminary classes.
“Even when he was the designated successor to the Leader of the Islamic Republic (1985)(1986)(1987)(1988)(1989), he was still based at the Qum seminary, and in addition to his political activity, taught at the highest level of seminary classes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingcitationKhomeini formulated the idea of wilāyat-i faqīh in Najaf, Iraq, in January 1970, and made no mention of it between then and September 1979, a few days after the principle of wilāyat-i faqīh was approved by the Assembly of Experts for the Constitution.
“Khomeini had formulated the idea of wilāyat-i faqīh in Najaf, Iraq, in January 1970, and made no mention of it between then and September 1979, a few days after the principle of wilāyat-i faqīh was approved by the Assembly of Experts for the Constitution”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ghobadzadeh Forthcoming
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenIn addition to traditional religious sources such as the Qur'ān, hadīths, and Shī'ī history, Wasatiyyah thinkers have also made use of various intellectual and philosophical schools of thought in the Western world in their attempts to challenge governmental Shī'ism.
“In addition to traditional religious sources such as the Qur”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenThere are few references in Montazeri's writings to Western thought or philosophy; his thinking reflects Qur'anic verses and hadiths, and all his arguments are presented within the conventional methodology of seminary scholarship.
“There are few references in his writings to Western thought or philosophy; his thinking reflects and refers to Qur”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
FindingreasoningIn their work, Wasatiyyah thinkers have highlighted the commonalities and potential for cooperation and rapprochement between the two civilizations of Islam and the West.
“In their work, they have highlighted the commonalities and potential for cooperation and rapprochement between the two civilizations of Islam and the West.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenBoth Montazeri and Sanei later withdrew from the government system and focused on research and teaching religious sciences in the seminary.
“However, both later withdrew from the government system and focused on research and teaching religious sciences in the seminary.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenWhile all Wasatiyyah thinkers share the aforementioned goals and aspire to the same broad outcomes, there is also considerable diversity among them.
“While all Wasatiyyah thinkers share the aforementioned goals and aspire to the same broad outcomes, there is also considerable diversity among them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenMontazeri was resoundingly voted onto the Assembly of Experts for the Constitution, and became its Chair.
“He was resoundingly voted onto the Assembly of Experts for the Constitution, and became its Chair.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenAfter these posts, Montazeri's most important official position was acting as the authorized representative of Khomeini in appointing members of the Supreme Judicial Council as well as judges throughout the country.
“After these posts, his most important official position was acting as the authorized representative of Khomeini in appointing members of the Supreme Judicial Council as well as judges throughout the country.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingcitationThe ruling of the Assembly of Experts referred to the fact that Montazeri 'is currently accepted by the overwhelming majority of the people as the future leader, and the Assembly of Experts of the Leadership recognizes and approves this choice'.
“The ruling of this Assembly of Experts referred to the fact that Montazeri”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ghasemi 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
FindingreasoningMany of the subjects Montazeri engaged with theologically in his classes and writings after 1997 reflected the ideas of the religious intellectuals and the issues raised in the reformist atmosphere of the Khatami years.
“Many of the subjects he engaged with theologically in his classes and writings after 1997 reflected the ideas of the religious intellectuals and the issues raised in the reformist atmosphere of the Khatami years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingcitationMontazeri argues that Qur'an 49:13 relates to the value of dignity, which has no effect on human social rights, and that all human beings, regardless of their level of faith and piety, enjoy such social rights.
“Separating the value of dignity from intrinsic dignity, Montazeri argues that this verse is related to value of dignity, which has no effect on human social rights, and that”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Montazeri 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningMany Muslim thinkers have not been involved in human rights issues beyond controversial issues, whereas Montazeri's engagement was expansive enough to include social rights.
“Many Muslim thinkers have not been involved in human rights issues beyond these controversial issues; in contrast, Montazeri's engagement in human rights issues was expansive to the extent that he broadened the discussion of human rights to encompass social rights too.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingcitationMontazeri cites numerous narrations to demonstrate that torture for the purpose of obtaining a confession is not permitted by sharī'a, and that any trial based on such a confession would be invalid.
“Montazeri also cites numerous narrations to demonstrate that torture for the purpose of obtaining a confession is not permitted by sharī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Montazeri 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim.
FindingreasoningMontazeri concludes that it is very difficult to prove apostasy.
“He concludes that it is very difficult to prove apostasy, because it cannot be said with certainty that a person who outwardly denies Islam really believes in its legitimacy in their heart, and denies Islam out of stubbornness or due to other motives.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationMontazeri argues that in the sacred texts, the word human is used and not the word believer, Muslim, woman, man, or jurist.
“Referring to many Qur”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningMontazeri had progressive views on women's rights and issued several progressive fatwas in this regard.
“Overall, Montazeri had progressive views on women's rights and issued several progressive fatwas in this regard.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingcitationMontazeri argues that enjoining good and forbidding evil is not limited to personal issues and is highly obligatory in relation to the social structures of religion and morality.
“Referring to the rule of”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationMontazeri argues that the Qur'an does not prescribe the death penalty for apostates.
“Montazeri gives various reasons and cites multiple religious sources in reaching this view, including the fact that the Qur”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Akbar 2021b source
Probably not a substantial claim.
FindingreasoningMontazeri concludes that if insult and desecration are prohibited, then the more fundamental rights of non-Muslims, such as the right to life and the right to a different opinion, are bestowed with even greater respect.
“He concludes that if insult and desecration are prohibited, then naturally the more fundamental rights of non-Muslims, such as the right to life and the right to a different opinion, are bestowed with even greater respect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationMontazeri argues that the ruling on apostasy is relevant to a person who intends to conspire against the Islamic community.
“and that the ruling on apostasy is relevant to a person who”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Montazeri 2006a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingcitationMontazeri defines faith as a practical and moral commitment to a belief found in the heart, and disbelief as denial and non-adherence to that belief.
“To clarify this discussion, Montazeri presents a definition of faith and disbelief:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Montazeri 2006c
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingcitationMontazeri emphasizes that human beings are honorable in essence, even if one is a disbeliever, because the essence of human beings is respected by God.
“Montazeri emphasizes that”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baghi 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenMontazeri identified strong legal foundations in religious sources for the right to a retirement pension, the right to education, the right to employment, and the right to housing.
“In religious sources, for example, Montazeri identified strong legal foundations for the right to a retirement pension, the right to education, the right to employment, and the right to housing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingcitationMontazeri states that according to Islamic sources and sunna, temporary detention is permitted only in the case of a murder charge, and even then only for a very limited period of time.
“Referring to a h .adīth from Imām S .ādiq, the sixth Imām, 23 he states that according to the Islamic sources and sunna, temporary detention is permitted only in the case of a murder charge, and even in that case can occur only for a very limited period of time (Montazeri 2015, pp. 103-4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Montazeri 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingcitationMontazeri argues that enjoining good and forbidding evil, in addition to being obligatory, is also a universal right.
“He also argues that enjoining good and forbidding evil, in addition to being obligatory, is also a”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationMontazeri concluded that there is no particular reason to prevent people from submitting to a female marja'-i taqlīd for religious direction.
“He concluded as a result that there is no particular reason to prevent people from submitting to a female marja”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Montazeri 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenThroughout the seminary's several-hundred-year history, no jurist produced a book or pamphlet under the title of human rights.
“Throughout the seminary's several-hundred-year history, no jurist produced a book or pamphlet under the title of human rights.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenMontazeri's thought separated a human's rights from his or her beliefs, considering human beings bestowed with inherent dignity and rights purely due to their humanity.
“However, Montazeri's thought separated a human's rights from his or her beliefs, considering human beings bestowed with inherent dignity and rights purely due to their humanity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationAccording to Montazeri, the complete and correct realization of the rule of enjoining good and forbidding evil requires freedom of expression and freedom of association.
“In other words, according to Montazeri, the complete and correct realization of the rule of enjoining good and forbidding evil requires freedom of expression and freedom of association (Montazeri 2000b(Montazeri , pp. 1031-34)-34).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Montazeri 2000b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationMontazeri writes that in the time of the Prophet and Imam Ali, there was not even a single case of a political prisoner being arrested and tried for expressing an opinion and criticizing the government.
“For this reason, Montazeri writes that in the time of the Prophet and Imām”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Montazeri 2006b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenMontazeri emphasizes that religion cannot be a matter of force.
“Referring to the verse,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationMontazeri responds that the hadith 'Do not consult women because their view is weak and their determination is unstable' does not impart a general rule or principle towards all women in all times and all circumstances.
“However, Montazeri responds that”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Montazeri 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingcitationMontazeri held that the key requisite of a person referred to for religious guidance is scholarly expertise, and that being a man or a woman is irrelevant to knowledge and scholarly expertise.
“In relation to the possibility of female marāja”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingcitationMontazeri argues that because the core of the issue has been eliminated and the Muslim community is so vast that one person leaving the faith cannot harm the religion, no punishment can be imposed for leaving Islam.
“Montazeri argues that because the core of the issue has now been eliminated, and the Muslim community is so vast that one person leaving the faith cannot harm the religion, no punishment can be imposed for it (Montazeri 2006a, pp. 692-95).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Montazeri 2006a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingcitationMontazeri argues that choosing a religion or belief, or changing it, is not apostasy.
“Montazeri argues that”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Montazeri 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingcitationMontazeri holds that when a sharī'a ruling conflicts with a ruling of theoretical or practical reason, the true aim of the sharī'a is different from the apparent content, or the content was limited to a specific time and place with other requirements.
“In his view, when a sharī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Montazeri 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingnone givenIn relation to each of his numerous examples of rights, Montazeri refers to evidence from Qur'anic verses and hadiths, and the early history of Islam, especially the words and deeds of the Prophet and Imam Ali.
“The important point in Montazeri's arguments is that in relation to each of his numerous examples of rights, he refers to evidence from Qur”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationAccording to Montazeri's reading, the narrative advising against consulting women is relevant to a time and society in which women were not permitted to develop intellectually.
“According to Montazeri's reading, this narrative is relevant to a time and society in which women were not permitted to develop intellectually.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationMontazeri defines an apostate as a person who, despite certainty in the legitimacy of Islam, denies it out of stubbornness or bigotry, or for political, economic, or other comparable motives.
“Montazeri continues that an apostate is a person who, despite their certainty in the legitimacy of Islam,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Montazeri 2006c
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingcitationMontazeri argued that throughout history, men's financial responsibilities have been greater than women's, and it is for this reason that these rulings have been issued.
“In defense of this view, Montazeri argues that throughout history, men's financial responsibilities have been greater than women's and it is for this reason that these rulings have been issued (Montazeri 2008, p. 128).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Montazeri 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenMontazeri avoided engagement in some controversial issues, such as the rights of homosexuals.
“He avoided engagement in some controversial issues, such as the rights of homosexuals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenIn Montazeri's view, in a Muslim-majority society, the minority will never gain the support of the majority to occupy a senior political post.
“In Montazeri's view, in a Muslim-majority society, the minority will never gain the support of the majority to occupy a senior political post.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingcitationMontazeri argues that minorities are equal to the majority in human rights, including public, civil, criminal, and commercial rights.
“In general, Montazeri argues that minorities are equal to the majority”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Montazeri 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationMontazeri claimed that judgeship and leadership are difficult tasks not commensurate with the physical and mental characteristics of women.
“He claimed that judgeship and leadership are difficult tasks not commensurate with the physical and mental characteristics of women.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThere can be no defense of the performance of governmental Shī'ism in terms of tolerance and moderation.
“There can be no defense either of the performance of governmental Shī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe doctrine of wilāyat-i faqīh exemplifies an authoritarian reading of Shī'ī political theology.
“The doctrine of wilāyat-i faqīh exemplifies an authoritarian reading of Shī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: According to the doctrine of wilāyat-i faqīh, the source of government legitimacy is the will of God and there is no place for popular sovereignty.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThe radicalism of Khomeinism is evident both in its theoretical framework (the doctrine of wilāyat-i faqīh) and in the track record of the political system of the Islamic Republic.
“The radicalism of this discourse is evident both in its theoretical framework, i.e., the doctrine of wilāyat-i faqīh, and in the track record of the political system of the Islamic Republic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Khomeinism was the first and most significant modern political stream of thought in the Shī'ī world.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
InterpretationreasoningThis discourse is a direct and inverse backlash to the discourse of governmental Shī'ism.
“This discourse is a direct and inverse backlash to the discourse of governmental Shī”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningGovernmental Shī'ism's reading of religion, and the manner in which it is implemented in the political, social, and international relations spheres, has no place in the conceptual framework of moderate Islam.
“In sum, governmental Shī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationKhomeini's jurisprudential innovation has been conceptualized as the expedient jurisprudence.
“This jurisprudential innovation of Khomeini has been conceptualized as the expedient jurisprudence”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hajjarian 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Ghobadzadeh 2014 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThe conceptual approach of wilāyat-i faqīh is based on the duties of believers and religious scholars, and citizenship rights are immaterial.
“Its conceptual approach is based on the duties of believers and religious scholars, an approach in which citizenship rights are immaterial.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: According to the doctrine of wilāyat-i faqīh, the source of government legitimacy is the will of God and there is no place for popular sovereignty.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone givenThe use of the term Wasatiyyah highlights the similarities between Shī'ī and Sunnī reformism.
“The use of the term Wasatiyyah highlights the similarities between Shī”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone givenA further feature of Khomeinism is its implacable opposition to the West.
“A further feature of Khomeinism is its implacable opposition to the West.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
InterpretationreasoningThe issue of stoning and mass executions, as well as the implementation of sharī'a punishments without the slightest concession, leaves no room to doubt that Iran's ruling clergy have a radical and intolerant interpretation of religion.
“The issue of stoning and mass executions, as well as the implementation of sharī”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone givenThe drafting of the constitution and the establishment of modern institutions indicated that Iran's ruling clergy had complied with a number of the rules of politicking in the modern world.
“The drafting of the constitution and the establishment of modern institutions indicated that Iran's ruling clergy had complied with a number of the rules of politicking in the modern world.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenThe purpose of these flexibilities is to expand the clergy's capacity to advance its own authoritarian policies and to more effectively constrain citizenship rights.
“In fact, the purpose of these flexibilities is to expand the clergy's capacity to advance its own authoritarian policies and to more effectively constrain citizenship rights.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenThese thinkers had close ties with the leftist political Islamists and therefore played a decisive role in the reformists' victory in the 1997 presidential election.
“These thinkers had close ties with the leftist political Islamists and therefore played a decisive role in the reformists' victory in the 1997 presidential election.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone givenThe concept of Wasatiyyah can explain the ideas of the Shī'ī-Iranian reform movement.
“This article proposes that the concept of Wasatiyyah can explain the ideas of the thinkers of the Shī”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningMontazeri was able to promote the idea of innate human dignity regardless of religious belief, and defend human rights, within the episteme of the seminary.
“I illustrate how Montazeri was able to promote the idea of innate human dignity regardless of religious belief, as well as defend human rights, within the episteme of the seminary.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Shī'ī seminary has an independent episteme that has set the rules for its thinkers for centuries.
- Rests on an assumption: According to the seminary episteme, individuals are duty-bound human beings and a person's rights are determined based on his or her religious beliefs.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisereasoningThe term Wasatiyyah can also be used to describe this discourse, as its English equivalent, moderation, is often used in the relevant literature.
“The term Wasatiyyah can also be used to describe this discourse, as its English equivalent, moderation, is often used in the relevant literature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningThe political system proposed in the doctrine of wilāyat-i faqīh is based on discrimination.
“The political system proposed in the doctrine of wilāyat-i faqīh is based on discrimination.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: According to the doctrine of wilāyat-i faqīh, the source of government legitimacy is the will of God and there is no place for popular sovereignty.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone givenThe ruling clergy have a similarly indefensible record on the rights of religious minorities, including those of Sunnī Muslims.
“The ruling clergy have a similarly indefensible record on the rights of religious minorities, including those of Sunnī Muslims.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenThe ruling clergy have formulated a harsh and highly discriminatory interpretation of the sharī'a, and force all citizens to comply with this reading through the coercive measures of the state apparatus.
“The ruling clergy have also formulated a harsh and highly discriminatory interpretation of the sharī”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThe exceptional importance of the ideas of Montazeri and Sanei in comparison with other Wasatiyyah thinkers arises from their laying of strong foundations for the promotion of human rights, democracy, freedom, and pluralism while also maintaining unqualified loyalty to the seminary episteme.
“The exceptional importance of the ideas of these two thinkers in comparison with other Wasatiyyah thinkers arises from their laying of strong foundations for the promotion of human rights, democracy, freedom, and pluralism while also maintaining unqualified loyalty to the seminary episteme.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationMontazeri became known as the spiritual father and moral voice of the Green Movement.
“he played a very active role in the day-to-day politics of the country and for this reason became known as the spiritual father and moral voice of the Green Movement (Dabashi 2017, p. 39;Schwerin 2015, p. 8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dabashi 2017 source
- cites Schwerin 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone givenAmong the Shī'ī Wasatiyyah thinkers, two individuals possess special status: Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri and Ayatollah Yousef Sanei.
“Among the Shī”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenAccording to the Wasatiyyah interpretation, human dignity, regardless of religious affiliation, is of fundamental importance.
“According to their interpretation, human dignity, regardless of religious affiliation, is of fundamental importance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningUnlike militant secularism, the Shī'ī Wasatiyyah school does not deny the role of religion in the public and political arenas, but sees the purpose of religion in the public and political spheres as promoting social justice and ending discrimination.
“Unlike militant secularism, the Shī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThe Shī'ī Wasatiyyah discourse provides an interpretation of religion that takes the challenges of contemporary society into account and meets the needs of Muslims in the modern world.
“The discourse provides an interpretation of religion that takes the challenges of contemporary society into account and meets the needs of Muslims in the modern world.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
InterpretationreasoningThrough his public statements as well as meetings with the country's officials, Montazeri played a decisive role in guiding the policies of the fledgling government of the Islamic Republic.
“The role of Montazeri was not limited to these examples, and through his public statements as well as meetings with the country's officials, played a decisive role in guiding the policies of the fledgling government of the Islamic Republic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough Khomeini was the architect of the theory of wilāyat-i faqīh, he had no direct role in its incorporation into the constitution of the Islamic Republic.
“Therefore, although Khomeini was the architect of the theory of wilāyat-i faqīh, he had no direct role in its incorporation into the constitution of the Islamic Republic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Premisenone givenOther Wasatiyyah thinkers in Iran are not able to connect to the segment of society that is the most important social base of the Shi'i government.
“This is very significant because, as mentioned earlier, other Wasatiyyah thinkers in Iran are not able to connect to this segment of society.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningMontazeri's challenges against governmental Shi'ism are internal, questioning the theoretical foundations of governmental Shi'ism in the language of religion.
“The challenges that Montazeri mounted against governmental Shī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThe novelty and boldness of Montazeri's work, and the value of his conceptualization of human rights, was that he located all his arguments in defense of the dignity and innate rights of humanity within the episteme of the seminary, using accepted methods of jurisprudential research.
“The novelty and boldness of Montazeri's work, and the value and importance of his conceptualization of human rights, was that he located all his arguments in defense of the dignity and innate rights of humanity within the episteme of the seminary, using the accepted methods of jurisprudential research.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenGenerally, jurists believe that shedding the blood of a person who abandons Islam is permissible.
“The situation of a person who changes his or her religious beliefs and abandons Islam is a controversial issue, but generally jurists 19 believe that shedding the blood of such a person is permissible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningFrom an Islamic perspective, the detention and trial of individuals on political charges is against sharī'a law.
“Therefore, from an Islamic perspective, the detention and trial of individuals on political charges is against sharī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningMontazeri was the first Shi'i jurist to write a book with 'human rights' in the title, and thus he can be considered the founder of human rights jurisprudence in the episteme of the Shi'i seminary.
“Montazeri was the first Shī”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisenone givenThe views of renowned Shi'i jurists are based on human inequality, and human rights were irrelevant to them.
“As mentioned, the views of the renowned Shī”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenMontazeri's ideas on the abovementioned issues are very close to today's human rights standards, but on other human rights issues his views can be subject to serious criticism.
“Montazeri's ideas about the abovementioned issues are very close to today's human rights standards, but in relation to other human rights issues, Montazeri's views can be subject to serious criticism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Premisenone givenLaws for non-Muslims include a subsidiary mechanism of discrimination; the jurisprudential rules that apply to the People of the Book differ from those applied to individuals with other or no religious beliefs.
“The laws for non-Muslims include a subsidiary mechanism of discrimination; the jurisprudential rules that apply to the People of the Book are different from those applied to individuals with other or no religious beliefs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisereasoningReferring to the opinions of one's predecessors is a dominant tradition in the seminary, and casting aside all the literature produced over more than a millennium and referring directly to the Qur'an and sunna is almost impossible.
“Referring to the opinions of one's predecessors is a dominant tradition in the seminary, and casting aside all the literature that has been produced over more than a millennium and referring directly to the Qur”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationMany Muslim thinkers have been criticized for having apologetic approaches.
“Many Muslim thinkers have been criticized for having apologetic approaches (Shavit 2017;Hughes 2015;Daneshgar 2020, pp. 15-65).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisereasoningIn relation to human rights, the apologetic approach is more pronounced because most discussions have focused solely on controversial issues such as apostasy, sharī'a punishments, or women's rights.
“In relation to the issue of human rights, the apologetic approach is even more pronounced since most discussions have focused solely on controversial issues such as the ruling on apostasy, the implementation of sharī”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenIn Shi'i jurisprudence, a human's rights are not separate from his or her beliefs.
“In Shī”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisenone givenShi'i jurisprudence enshrines substantial differences between Muslims and non-Muslims, and even between Shi'as and Sunnis.
“Shī”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
InterpretationreasoningMontazeri was important not only in terms of his statements and ideas.
“In sum, Montazeri was not only important in terms of his statements and ideas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenMontazeri's views on the rights of minorities are considered progressive within the seminary's episteme, but they are far from the standards accepted today.
“Although Montazeri's views on the rights of minorities are considered progressive within the seminary's episteme, they are far from the standards accepted today.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenThe article's central claim is that Montazeri made fundamental changes to the seminary episteme from within, forging a path that is being continued and expanded by his students today.
“Rather, its central claim is that Montazeri made fundamental changes to the seminary episteme from within, forging a path that is being continued and expanded by his students today.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningMontazeri's position in the seminary, as well as the context in which he conceptualized his progressive ideas, was even more significant than his statements and ideas.
“His position in the seminary, as well as the context in which he conceptualized his progressive ideas, was even more significant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The experience of clerical government in Iran has led to a flourishing of Shī'ī political thought.
“it can hardly be disputed that the experience has led to the flourishing of Shī”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Shī'ī seminary has an independent episteme that has set the rules for its thinkers for centuries.
“The Shī”
The paper relies on this without support.
According to the seminary episteme, individuals are duty-bound human beings and a person's rights are determined based on his or her religious beliefs.
“According to the seminary episteme, individuals are duty-bound human beings and a person's rights are determined based on his or her religious beliefs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Khomeinism was the first and most significant modern political stream of thought in the Shī'ī world.
“Khomeinism was the first and most significant modern political stream of thought in the Shī”
The paper relies on this without support.
According to the doctrine of wilāyat-i faqīh, the source of government legitimacy is the will of God and there is no place for popular sovereignty.
“According to this doctrine, the source of government legitimacy is the will of God and there is no place for popular sovereignty.”
The paper relies on this without support.
As soon as Montazeri learned of Khomeini's decision, he tried unsuccessfully to prevent the 1988 mass executions.
“It was revealed after the fact that as soon as he learned of Khomeini's decision, Montazeri tried unsuccessfully to prevent the executions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The publication of Montazeri's letters to Khomeini regarding the executions led to the removal of his designation as successor to the Leader.
“The publication of Montazeri's letters to Khomeini in relation to this matter led to the removal of his designation as successor to the Leader.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Government law in Iran institutionalizes persecution in the country's legal, judicial, and political systems.
“Perhaps the most serious evidence of human rights violations in Iran is government law, which institutionalizes persecution in the country's legal, judicial, and political systems.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Saffari citation points outside the listed article's page range
MinorThe text cites pages 105-12 of Saffari (1993), but the reference list gives that article's page range as 64-82.
“(Saffari 1993, pp. 105-12;Schwerin 2015, pp. 42-64;Siavoshi 2017;Abdo 2001, p. 15)”
“72. Saffari, Said. 1993. The legitimation of the clergy's right to rule in the Iranian Constitution of 1979. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 20: 64-82.”
Citations
Cites
Abrahamian, E. (1999) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520922907 · Cited by 283
Islam and the Challenge of Democracy
Fadl, K. M. A. E., Cohen, J. 1., & Chasman, D. (2005) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 241
Islam and the Challenge of Democracy: A Boston Review Book
Abou El Fadl, K. (2004) · doi:10.1515/9781400873203 · Cited by 92
The legitimation of the clergy’s right to rule in the Iranian Constitution of 1979
Saffari, S. (1993) · British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies · doi:10.1080/13530199308705571 · Cited by 88 · cited 1×
“It is not without reason that Montazeri, along with the two aforementioned personalities, are known as the architects of the faqı̄hcentered constitution (Saffari 1993, pp. 105–12; Schwerin 2015, pp. 42–64; Siavoshi 2017; Abdo 2001, p. 15).”
BackgroundIslam, law, and political control in contemporary Iran
Tamadonfar, M. (2001) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.1111/0021-8294.00051 · Cited by 81
Islam and the Tyranny of Authenticity: An Inquiry into Disciplinary Apologetics and Self-Deception
Hughes, A. W. (2016) · Equinox Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1558/isbn.9781781792919 · Cited by 62
Religious Secularity: Shiite Repudiation of the Islamic State
Ghobadzadeh, N. (2014) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199391172.001.0001 · Cited by 60
Self-citationRe-Thinking the Islamic Republic: A 'Conversation' with Ayatollah Hossein 'Ali Montazeri
Abdo, G. (2001) · The Middle East Journal · Cited by 57
Building the Islamic State: The Draft Constitution of 1979 Reconsidered
Randjbar-Daemi, S. (2013) · Iranian Studies · doi:10.1080/00210862.2013.784519 · Cited by 41 · cited 1×
“…the publication of the draft constitution and the election of the Assembly of Experts for the Constitution in June and July 1979, Montazeri presented the most coherent proposal of wilāyat-i faqı̄h and called for its inclusion in the constitution (Montazeri 1979; Randjbar-Daemi 2013, p. 654).”
BackgroundDabashi, H., & Nikzadfar, N. (2017) · doi:10.4324/9781315132365 · Cited by 36 · cited 2×
“…the end of Montazeri’s life, which coincided with the beginning of the Green Movement, he played a very active role in the day-to-day politics of the country and for this reason became known as the spiritual father and moral voice of the Green Movement (Dabashi 2017, p. 39; Schwerin 2015, p. 8).”
BackgroundMontazeri: The Life and Thought of Iran's Revolutionary Ayatollah
Siavoshi, S. (2017) · doi:10.1017/9781316536568 · Cited by 34
Religious Leaders and Family Planning in Iran
Moinifar, H. S. (2007) · Iran and the Caucasus · doi:10.1163/157338407x265504 · Cited by 31
Kamali, M. H. (2015) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190226831.003.0017 · Cited by 30
Law and Tradition in Classical Islamic Thought
Cook, M., Haider, N. I., Rabb, I. A., et al. (2013) · Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137078957 · Cited by 26
Rahimi, B. (2012) · International Political Science Review · doi:10.1177/0192512111402103 · Cited by 25
Kasravi: the integrative nationalist of Iran
Abrahamian, E. (1973) · Middle Eastern Studies · doi:10.1080/00263207308700249 · Cited by 24 · cited 1×
“For a discussion of Hakamizadeh and Kasravi, see (Kia 2014; Basirat-Manesh 2016; Asil 1977; Abrahamian 1973; Ja’farian 2019; Ridgeon 2006).”
Background(2015) · I.B.Tauris eBooks · doi:10.5040/9780755609031 · Cited by 22
Ridgeon, L. (2006) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203571941 · Cited by 20
Studying the Qur'an in the Muslim Academy
Daneshgar, M. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190067540.001.0001 · Cited by 16 · cited 1×
“Many Muslim thinkers have been criticized for having apologetic approaches (Shavit 2017; Hughes 2015; Daneshgar 2020, pp. 15–65).”
BackgroundThe Shi'i Construction of Taqlid
Clarke, L. (2001) · Journal of Islamic Studies · doi:10.1093/jis/12.1.40 · Cited by 15
Shimamoto, T. (2006) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · doi:10.14988/re.2017.0000015691 · Cited by 13
Ahmad Qabil, a reason to believe and the New Religious Thinking in Iran
Ridgeon, L. (2020) · Middle Eastern Studies · doi:10.1080/00263206.2019.1643330 · Cited by 11
Ayatollah Yusuf Sanei’s Contribution to the Discourse of Women’s Rights
Akbar, A. (2021) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel12070535 · Cited by 8 · cited 2×
“Montazeri gives various reasons and cites multiple religious sources in reaching this view, including the fact that the Qur “ ān does not prescribe the death penalty for apostates (Akbar 2021b, p. 9).”
BackgroundThe Scum of Tabriz: Ahmad Kasravi and the Impulse to Reform Islam
Kia, C. (2014) · British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies · doi:10.1080/13530194.2014.932270 · Cited by 6 · cited 1×
“For a discussion of Hakamizadeh and Kasravi, see (Kia 2014; Basirat-Manesh 2016; Asil 1977; Abrahamian 1973; Ja’farian 2019; Ridgeon 2006).”
BackgroundElections in the Islamic Republic of Iran: A source of democratic learning and moderation
Ghobadzadeh, N. (2018) · Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research · doi:10.1386/jammr.11.2.157_1 · Cited by 6 · cited 1×
“5 See for example (Tezcür 2010; Amini and Rahmani 2016; Kamali 2015; Ghobadzadeh 2018).”
BackgroundSelf-citationScientific and Political Freedom in Islam: A Critical Reading of the Modernist-Apologetic School
Shavit, U. (2017) · doi:10.4324/9781315268668 · Cited by 6 · cited 1×
“Many Muslim thinkers have been criticized for having apologetic approaches (Shavit 2017; Hughes 2015; Daneshgar 2020, pp. 15–65).”
BackgroundGoudarzi, M. R. (2021) · Women & Criminal Justice · doi:10.1080/08974454.2021.1975015 · Cited by 5
Rational Shari’ah: Ahmad Qabel’s Reformist Approach
Jahanbakhsh, F. (2020) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel11120665 · Cited by 4
Hijab: Three Modern Iranian Seminarian Perspectives
Ridgeon, L. (2021) · doi:10.2307/j.ctv1wmz3nq · Cited by 4
The Political Thought of Ayatollah Murtaza Mutahhari
Davari, M. T. (2004) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203335239 · Cited by 4
Le massacre des prisonniers politiques de 1988 en Iran : une mobilisation forclose ?
Sorg, H. (2008) · Raisons politiques · doi:10.3917/rai.030.0059 · Cited by 3 · cited 1×
“For further analysis of these executions, see (Shahrooz 2007; Abrahamian 1999, pp. 209–28; Sorg 2008; Robertson 2011; Mohajer 2020).”
BackgroundModeration Movement in Iran; Moving between Liberalism and Religious Intellectualism
Amini, A., & Rahmani, A. H. M. (2016) · Journal of Sociological Research · doi:10.5296/jsr.v7i1.8757 · Cited by 3
The Flock of a Shepherd or the Sovereign Citizen: Ayatollah Montazeri on the Role of the People
Siavoshi, S. (2016) · Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern studies · doi:10.1353/jsa.2016.0020 · Cited by 3
Akbar, A. (2021) · Oxford Journal of Law and Religion · doi:10.1093/ojlr/rwab005 · Cited by 2 · cited 2×
“Montazeri gives various reasons and cites multiple religious sources in reaching this view, including the fact that the Qur “ ān does not prescribe the death penalty for apostates (Akbar 2021b, p. 9).”
BackgroundCultivating Human Rights: Islamic Law and the Humanist Imperative
El Fadl, K. A. (2013) · Law and Tradition in Classical Islamic Thought · doi:10.1057/9781137078957_9 · Cited by 2
Shi'i Reformation in Iran: The Life and Theology of Shari’at Sangelaji
Rahnema, A. (2015) · doi:10.4324/9781315609003 · Cited by 1
Studying the Qur'an in the Muslim Academy: Introduction
Daneshgar, M. (2020) · Studying the Qur'an in the Muslim Academy · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190067540.003.0001
Muslim Reformers in Iran and Turkey: The Paradox of Moderation
Tezcür, G. M. (2010) · doi:10.7560/721975
The Fundamental Problem in the Clerical Establishment
Motahhari, M., & Dabashi, H. (2001) · The Most Learned of the Shiʿa · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195137996.003.0011
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- 2016, A topical study of sources of Imam Khomeini’s Kashf ul-Asrar [مطالعه موضوعی منابع کشفالاسرار امام خمینی], Zharfa Pazhooh, 2, 1
- Ebrahimnezhad, 2016, A review and critique of Ayatollah Sanei’s rationale for the equality of blood money for men and woman [بررسی و نقد ادله نظریه آیتالله صانعی در برابری دیه زن و مرد], Jurisprudence and Islamic Law, 7, 1
- Foucault, Michel (1989). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, Routledge.
- Ghobadzadeh, Naser. Theocratic Secularism vs. Governmental shīʿism, Oxford University Press. Forthcoming.
- Hosseini, Omid (2011). A Review of the Political and Jurisprudential Perspectives of Ayatollah Sanei [بازخوانی دیدگاههای سیاسی و فقهی آیتالله صانعی], Markaz-e Asnad-e Enqelab-e Eslami.
- Manbachi, Katie Maryam (2013). The Evolution of Ayatollah Montazeri’s Doctrine of Velāyat-e Faqih. [Master’s thesis, Department of Near Eastern Studies, Princeton University].
- Qureishi, Assifa, and Vogel, Frank E. (2008). Women’s right to terminate the marriage contract: The case of Iran. The Islamic Marriage Contract, Harvard University Press.
- Montazeri, Hussein Ali (2000a). Memoirs of Ayatollah Montazeri, Vol. 1 [خاطرات آیتالله منتظری، جلد اول], The Office of Grand Ayatollah Montazeri.
- Montazeri, Hussein Ali (2000b). Memoirs of Ayatollah Montazeri, Vol. 2 [خاطرات آیتالله منتظری، جلد دوم], The Office of Grand Ayatollah Montazeri.
- Montazeri, Hussein Ali (2006c). Treatise of Requests for Legal Opinion, Vol. 2 [رساله استفتائات، جلد دوم], Sayeh.
- Shahrooz, 2007, With Revolutionary Rage and Rancor: Preliminary Report on the 1988 Massacre of Iran’s Political Prisoners, Harvard Human Rights Journal, 20, 227
- Soroush, 1995a, The Ceiling of livelihood upon the pillar of religion [سقف شریعت بر ستون معیشت], Kiyan, 5, 25
- Soroush, 1995b, Liberty and clergy [حریت و روحانیت], Kiyan, 4, 2
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Asghari, S. (2023) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel14040505 · Cited by 12
Managing Religion and Religious Changes in Iran
Tous, S. A., & Richardson, J. T. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009460095 · Cited by 9
Ghobadzadeh, N. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197606797.001.0001 · Cited by 2
Self-citationMahmoud Taleghani: A Pioneer Thinker of Social Islam in Contemporary Iran
Lolaki, S. M. (2024) · Digest of Middle East Studies · doi:10.1111/dome.12346 · Cited by 1
Goudarzi, M. R. (2025) · Digest of Middle East Studies · doi:10.1111/dome.12351 · Cited by 1
Ghobadzadeh, N. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197606797.003.0001
Self-citationThe Political Germination of a Religious Doctrine
Ghobadzadeh, N. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197606797.003.0006
Self-citationGhobadzadeh, N. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197606797.003.0003
Self-citationGhobadzadeh, N. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197606797.003.0005
Self-citationGhobadzadeh, N. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197606797.003.0007
Self-citationGhobadzadeh, N. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197606797.003.0010
Self-citationGhobadzadeh, N. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197606797.002.0004
Self-citationThe Creeping Entrance of the Idea of Wilāyat-i Faqīh
Ghobadzadeh, N. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197606797.003.0008
Self-citationGhobadzadeh, N. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197606797.003.0004
Self-citationGhobadzadeh, N. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197606797.003.0002
Self-citationThe Genie Is Out of the Bottle
Ghobadzadeh, N. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197606797.003.0009
Self-citationGhobadzadeh, N. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197606797.002.0005
Self-citationInclusivist discourses among contemporary Shia religious scholars about people of other faiths
Akbar, A., & Saeed, A. (2026) · Critical Research on Religion · doi:10.1177/20503032261416046
“While a few studies have explored how some contemporary Shia clerics have dealt with the rights of non-Muslims (Brunner 2013; Clarke 2020; Ghobadzadeh 2022; Edalatnejad 2022, 198 – 210; Akbar 2025a), how Shia scholars have contributed to inclusivist trends during the modern period remains an…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghobadzadeh, N.
- Affiliations
- Australian Catholic University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Ghobadzadeh, Naser
- ORCID
- Ghobadzadeh, Naser
- Venue
- Religions
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-01-28
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 126
- ISSN
- 2077-1444 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4210542130
- Semantic Scholar
- cbdc7638e74bf53ea89b622121a2c61fb66c8c9c
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 13
- FWCI
- 13.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Religions (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Islamic Studies and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Islamic Thought and Society Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
- Keywords
- human rights, Shi'i political thought, Imam Khomeini, Islamic jurisprudence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-26, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-26 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review