Iran, Israel and the Middle East Conflict1
Abstract
The Islamic revolution in Iran led to a dramatic change in the country's foreign policy outlook and in its involvement in the international arena. Gradually, however, the new regime was forced to adapt its dogma to reality, and became increasingly pragmatic. One major area in which Iran's policy has remained excessively uncompromising has been the inherent hostility to Israel, rejection of Zionism and the legitimacy of the Jewish state. In this case, ideological hostility did not seem to conflict with pragmatic interests of state. The attitudes expressed by Iranian politicians, polemicists and intellectuals towards Israel have come to represent the ideological framework and political reality of the state.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Since the 1990s, Israeli governments have pressured the USA to tighten its sanctions regime against Iran and prevent it from becoming a nuclear power.
“Since the 1990s, Israeli governments have put pressure on the USA to tighten its sanction regime against Iran and to prevent it from becoming a nuclear power (Menashri, 2006).”
From The Aggravated Struggle for Regional Power in the Middle East: American Allies Saudi Arabia and Israel versus Iran (2020) · cites this paper as Menashri, 2006
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Beck, M. (2020) · Global Policy · doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12778 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
- Authors
- Menashri, D.
- Corresponding author
- Menashri, David
- Venue
- Israel Affairs
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 107-122
- ISSN
- 1353-7121 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9086
- OpenAlex
- W2027132322
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Israel Affairs (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East Politics and Society
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Keywords
- Iranian foreign policy, Iran-Israel relations, Middle East conflict, Iranian Revolution, anti-Zionism, Iranian intellectuals, pragmatism in foreign policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review