The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrating theory and practice in the pre-service teacher education practicum
Open accessAbstract
This article reports on a study into student teachers’ perceptions about their professional development during practicum. Framed within a symbolic interactionist perspective, the study examined to what extent, and how effectively, one group of student teachers was able to integrate theory and practice during a three-week practicum in the first year of their degree. The context for this mixed methods study was a Master of Teaching, graduate-level entry programme in the Faculty of Education at an urban Australian university. Although there is a strong field of literature around the practicum in pre-service teacher education, there has been a limited focus on how student teachers themselves perceive their development during this learning period. Further, despite widespread and longstanding acknowledgement of the ‘gap’ between theory and practice in teacher education, there is still more to learn about how well the practicum enables an integration of these two dimensions of teacher preparation. In presenting three major findings of the study, this paper goes some way in addressing these shortcomings in the literature. First, participants in this study largely valued both the theoretical and practical components of their programme, which stands in contrast to the commonly identified tendency of the student teacher to privilege practice over theory. Second, opportunities to integrate theory and practice were varied, with many participants reporting the detrimental impact of an apparent lack of clarity around stakeholders’ roles and responsibilities. Third, participants overwhelmingly supported the notion of linking university coursework assessment to the practicum as a means of bridging the gap between, on the one hand, the university and the school and, on the other hand, theory and practice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Allen and Wright (2014) concur that pre-service teachers are frustrated over the coursework and attach very little value to it, both intellectually and practically.”
From Pedagogical dilemma in teacher education: Bridging the theory practice gap (2023) · cites this paper as Allen and Wright 2014
In the citing paper
“However, 'a widely discerned problem lies in the fact that there is often a huge disparity between the types of skills and knowledge taught in pre-service programmes and the realities of workplace practice' (Allen and Wright 2014, 136).”
From Pedagogical dilemma in teacher education: Bridging the theory practice gap (2023) · cites this paper as Allen and Wright 2014
In the citing paper
“Extensive research over the past few decades highlights the impact of a theory-practice gap (Allen & Wright, 2013;McGarr et al., 2016)”
From Using LEGO® Six Bricks® as an educational resource to address challenges pre-service teachers face during school-based teaching practice (2025) · cites this paper as Allen & Wright, 2013
Citations
Cites
Qualitative research and evaluation methods
Patton, M. Q. (1980) · Cited by 35,637
The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action
Checkoway, B. N., & Schön, D. A. (1985) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3324262 · Cited by 21,311
Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.)
Sharp, C. (2003) · Evaluation Journal of Australasia · doi:10.1177/1035719x0300300213 · Cited by 14,982
Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method.
Kanter, R. M., & Blumer, H. (1971) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094060 · Cited by 9,898
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203224342 · Cited by 5,180
Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2000-2001.
Rudner, L. M., & Schafer, W. D. (2001) · Practical assessment, research & evaluation · Cited by 3,905
Making sense of qualitative data
Coffey, A. J., & Atkinson, P. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,855
Zeichner, K. (2010) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/0022487109347671 · Cited by 2,615
The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action
Bogumil, R. J. (1985) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/proc.1985.13210 · Cited by 2,328
Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education
Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540600902875340 · Cited by 1,759
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Allen J. M., 2007, Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 8, 23
- Crotty M. J., 1998, The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research project
- Driscoll A., 1994, Teacher Education Quarterly, 21, 59
- Hartocollis A., 2005, New York Times Education Supplement, 1
- Marginson S., 2006, Australian universities in a global context
- Qualtrics Labs, Inc., 2011, Qualtrics software (Version 22, 814)
- University of Tasmania, 2011, Social Sciences HREC
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Online teaching placement during the COVID-19 pandemic in Chile: challenges and opportunities
Sepulveda-Escobar, P., & Morrison, A. (2020) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2020.1820981 · Cited by 550
Surr, C. A., Gates, C., Irving, D., Oyebode, J., Smith, S. J., Parveen, S., Drury, M., & Dennison, A. (2017) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654317723305 · Cited by 327
Kidd, W., & Murray, J. (2020) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2020.1820480 · Cited by 352
Opportunities and challenges: teacher education in Israel in the Covid-19 pandemic
Donitsa‐Schmidt, S., & Ramot, R. (2020) · Journal of Education for Teaching International Research and Pedagogy · doi:10.1080/02607476.2020.1799708 · Cited by 287
Elements of a quality pre-service teacher mentor: A literature review
Ellis, N. J., Alonzo, D., & Nguyen, H. T. M. (2020) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2020.103072 · Cited by 243
Metadata
- Authors
- Allen, J. M., & Wright, S. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Tasmania (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Allen, Jeanne Maree
- Venue
- Teachers and Teaching
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-10-16
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 136-151
- ISSN
- 1354-0602 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1278
- OpenAlex
- W2065577715
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 45.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Teachers and Teaching (publishedVersion)
- eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
- Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
- Keywords
- initial teacher education, practicum, theory-practice integration, student teachers' perceptions, professional development, symbolic interactionism, university-school partnership, coursework assessment, stakeholder roles and responsibilities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review