Teacher identity and agency in an era of accountability
Abstract
The current zeitgeist in education in the USA emphasizes accountability for schools, students, and teachers, based on performance that can be easily quantified. Within this, current debates involving who should be teaching, what a good teacher looks like, and how best to evaluate and reward teachers are actually debates about the teaching profession. Inside such social and policy debates, however, lie real teachers with complex professional selves. The qualitative study reported here investigated how primary school teachers constructed self-understandings of what it means to be a professional inside the current educational reform context in the USA. Drawing from social-practice theories of identity construction and conceiving of the current educational reform discourses as sets of diffuse force relations that shape the social contexts and conditions of possibility in which American teachers work, this study sought to understand how nine California teachers made sense of their own professional selves amid the reform climate. With a special focus on professional agency, this article uses teacher identity to examine the interplay of how teachers are shaped by reform contexts and discourses, as well as how they resist and negotiate in order to create a place for themselves in both their schools and the current national policy and reform climate.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The articles reviewed referred to the effects of policy reform context on teachers' identities.
“The articles reviewed referred to the effects of policy reform context on teachers' identities (Buchanan, 2015;George et al., 2003;Hendrikx, 2020;Trowman, 2008)”
From Understanding teacher identity in teachers' professional lives: A systematic review of the literature (2023) · cites this paper as Buchanan, 2015
Buchanan (2015) cites Hargreaves (2000) to suggest teachers have become postprofessionals who implement decisions made by others.
“In the same vein, Buchanan (2015) cites Hargreaves (2000) to suggest teachers have become postprofessionals who implement decisions made by others.”
From Teacher agency and professional learning communities; what can Learning Rounds in Scotland teach us? (2017) · cites this paper as Buchanan (2015)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rushton, E. A. C., Rawlings Smith, E., Steadman, S., & Towers, E. (2023) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.3417 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Teacher agency and professional learning communities; what can Learning Rounds in Scotland teach us?
Philpott, C., & Oates, C. (2017) · Professional Development in Education · doi:10.1080/19415257.2016.1180316 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
- Authors
- Buchanan, R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
- Corresponding author
- Buchanan, Rebecca
- ORCID
- Buchanan, Rebecca
- Venue
- Teachers and Teaching
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-06-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 700-719
- ISSN
- 1354-0602 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1278
- OpenAlex
- W1763160380
- Cited by
- 570
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 60 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 118.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teachers and Teaching (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
- Keywords
- teacher identity, professional agency, educational accountability, educational reform, teacher self-understanding, primary school teachers, social practice theory, identity construction, resistance to reform, California teachers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review