Recognising and realising teachers’ professional agency
Abstract
This reflection on the eight papers in this special issue examines the theoretical stances and methodological resources to be found in them. It offers a definition of agency which emphasises commitment, responsibility, strong judgements, self-evaluation, connection to the common good and attention to what people do. Having examined how the papers relate to this definition, it considers its methodological implications, pointing to the advantages of recognising how agency emerges in the dialectical interaction of person and practice. The methodological challenges of capturing agency when defined in this way are discussed and more attention to ethnographic approaches is urged. The discussion concludes by advocating a strong relational and collective reading of teachers’ professional agency, where autonomy is found at the level of the profession as public guardian and nurturer of the commitments and values that mark the teaching profession.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Edwards (2015) cautions that Learning Rounds may only be affordances for weak evaluation.
“As Edwards (2015) cautions they may only be affordances for weak evaluation.”
From Teacher agency and professional learning communities; what can Learning Rounds in Scotland teach us? (2017) · cites this paper as Edwards (2015)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teacher agency and professional learning communities; what can Learning Rounds in Scotland teach us?
Philpott, C., & Oates, C. (2017) · Professional Development in Education · doi:10.1080/19415257.2016.1180316 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
- Authors
- Edwards, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Edwards, Anne
- ORCID
- Edwards, Anne
- Venue
- Teachers and Teaching
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-06-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 779-784
- ISSN
- 1354-0602 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1278
- OpenAlex
- W1592098653
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 65.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teachers and Teaching (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Education, Philosophy, and Society
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
- Keywords
- professional agency, teacher agency, self-assessment, common good, ethnographic methods, teaching profession, professional autonomy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review