Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4Artistic and Creative ResearchTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesPosthumanist Ethics and Activism

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Using found poetry to explore creativity in the professional lives of English teachers

Open access
Matthews, Martin, Bamber, Sally, Jones, Luke·2023·Teachers and Teaching

Abstract

This arts-based research considers creativity in the professional lives of English teachers in a school in England within the context of a progressively performative education system. In addition, it explores how found poetry can represent participants’ voices in an illuminating and authentic manner. The teachers who participated in the study were able to scrutinise, reflect and comment upon the content of poems created from the words found in an initial interview transcript. This recursive process supports a credible way of seeing and knowing the teachers’ voices in a representation that gives a deeper understanding of the participants’ creative experiences. The construction, interrogation, and presentation of the found poems reveal that the teachers of English believe they have reduced freedom to be creative or to act with agency in their professional lives. The reduced freedom to be creative stems from the normalising practices of working within a culture of performance. The restrictions are both tangible and self-imposed by the participants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13540602.2023.2201422

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Adams, J., & Owens, A. (2016). Creativity and democracy in education. Routledge.
  2. 10.1111/j.0011-1562.2005.00611.x · DOI
  3. 10.1207/s15544818ped0101_4 · DOI
  4. Baker, J. (Ed.). (2014). Found poetry review. volume seven. Amazon.
  5. 10.1080/0268093022000043065 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Ball, S. J. (2013). The education debate. The Policy Press.
  7. 10.1080/17508487.2013.740678 · DOI
  8. 10.4324/9780203508527 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Brady, I. (2009). Foreword. In M. Prendergast, C. Leggo, & P. Sameshima (Eds.), Poetic inquiry vibrant voices in the social sciences (pp. pp. xi- xvii). Sense Publishers.
  10. 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Butler-Kisber, L. (2002). Artful portrayals in qualitative inquiry: The road to found poetry and beyond. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 19(3), 229–239.
  13. Clough, P., & Nutbrown, C. (2007). Methodology, justifying enquiry (2nd ed.). Sage.
  14. Craft, A. (2010). Little c creativity. In A. Craft, B. Jeffrey, & M. Leibling (Eds.), Creativity in education (5th ed., pp. 45–61). Continuum.
  15. 10.4324/9781315417370 · DOI
  16. Eisner, E. (1985). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. Macmillan Publishing Company.
  17. 10.4324/9781351044233 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/00131911.2019.1532718 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Gielen, P. (2013). Creativity and other fundamentalisms. Mondriaan Fund.
  20. Goleman, D., Kaufman, P., & Ray, M. (1993). The creative spirit. Penguin.
  21. Hooks, B. (2019). Teaching critical thinking: Practical wisdom. Routledge.
  22. Hutchings, M. (2015). Exam factories: The impact of accountability measures on children and young people. NUT.
  23. 10.1080/03054985.2016.1142865 · DOI
  24. Leavy, P. (2015). Method meets art. Arts based research practices (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
  25. Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 97–128). Sage.
  26. 10.1080/1743727X.2020.1724279 · DOI
  27. Marshall, B. (2010). Creating danger: The place of the arts in education policy. In A. Craft, B. Jeffrey, & M. Leibling (Eds.), Creativity in education (5th ed., pp. 1–16). Continuum.
  28. 10.1080/13540602.2018.1462790 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/01626620.2011.10519484 · DOI
  30. 10.1080/00071005.2017.1372560 · DOI
  31. 10.1080/0951839032000060635 · DOI
  32. 10.4135/9781412986526 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/13540602.2020.1806050 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/00071005.2017.1322683 · DOI
  35. 10.1080/1743727X.2015.1119110 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Matthews, M., Bamber, S., & Jones, L.
Affiliations
University of Chester (GB)
Corresponding author
Jones, Luke
Venue
Teachers and Teaching
Published
2023-04-26
Volume
29
Issue
7-8
Pages
739-752
ISSN
  • 1354-0602 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1278
OpenAlex
W4367322842
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
11.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Teachers and Teaching (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ChesterRep (University of Chester) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Artistic and Creative Research
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Keywords
found poetry, teacher creativity, English teachers, professional agency, teacher voice, arts-based research, reflective practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review