The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) as drug candidates: a patent review (2003–2015)
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) represent the large group of endogenous compounds widely distributed in nature. Due to their broad spectrum of antibiotic activity, as well as anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties, AMPs became a model for the discovery of novel antimicrobial drugs that could answer the problem of the increasing antibiotic resistance of pathogenic microorganisms. AREAS COVERED: The review represents a comprehensive analysis of patents and patent applications from the year 2003 to 2015 referring to the therapeutic use of AMPs. The article highlights the general trends in the design, potential mode of action, and methods of biological evaluation of AMPs. EXPERT OPINION: The existing discord between the upcoming list of antimicrobial peptides claimed in the patents or related scientific articles as the potent drug candidates and the frequent failures of AMPs in clinical trials emphasize the need of a better understanding of their pleiotropic nature and mechanisms of host defense in general. Nevertheless, the encouraging examples of AMPs already introduced into the market, like Polymyxin or Fuzeon®, give some reason for optimism that development of AMPs as a novel class of antibiotics is still considered viable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The value of antimicrobial peptides in the age of resistance
Magana, M., Pushpanathan, M., Santos, A. L., Leanse, L., Fernandez, M., Ioannidis, A., Giulianotti, M. A., Apidianakis, Y., Bradfute, S., Ferguson, A. L., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30327-3 · Cited by 1,150
Gan, B. H., Gaynord, J., Rowe, S. M., Deingruber, T., & Spring, D. R. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00729c · Cited by 511
The Vast Structural Diversity of Antimicrobial Peptides
Koehbach, J., & Craik, D. J. (2019) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2019.04.012 · Cited by 294
Advances in Development of Antimicrobial Peptidomimetics as Potential Drugs
Molchanova, N., Hansen, P., & Franzyk, H. (2017) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules22091430 · Cited by 257
Sonderegger, C., Váradi, G., Galgóczy, L., Kocsubé, S., Posch, W., Borics, A., Dubrac, S., Tóth, G. K., Wilflingseder, D., & Marx, F. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.01655 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Kosikowska, P., & Lesner, A.
- Venue
- Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-04-22
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 689-702
- ISSN
- 1354-3776 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-7674
- OpenAlex
- W2331308278
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) as drug candidates: a patent review (2003–2015). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13543776.2016.1176149
- The paper
- Kosikowska, P., & Lesner, A. (2016). Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) as drug candidates: a patent review (2003–2015). Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents. https://doi.org/10.1080/13543776.2016.1176149
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.