Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 417

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social Provisioning as a Starting Point for Feminist Economics

Power, Marilyn·2004·Feminist Economics

Abstract

The past decade has seen a proliferation of writing by feminist economists. Feminist economists are not identified with one particular economic paradigm, yet some common methodological points seem to be emerging. I propose making these starting points more explicit so that they can be examined, critiqued, and built upon. I use the term “social provisioning” to describe this emerging methodology. Its five main components are: incorporation of caring and unpaid labor as fundamental economic activities; use of well-being as a measure of economic success; analysis of economic, political, and social processes and power relations; inclusion of ethical goals and values as an intrinsic part of the analysis; and interrogation of differences by class, race-ethnicity, and other factors. The paper then provides brief illustrations of the use of this methodology in analyses of US welfare reform, gender and development, and feminist ecological economics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1354570042000267608

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 10.1080/13545709610001707666 · doi:10.1080/13545709610001707666
  2. 10.1080/135457099337950 · doi:10.1080/135457099337950
  3. Barker Drucilla K 1999 Feminist Philosophy of Science in Phillip Anthony O'Hara (ed.) Encyclopedia of Political Economy pp. 325 – 27 London and New York: Routledge
  4. Beneria Lourdes Floro Maria Forthcoming Distribution Gender and Labor Market Informalization: A Conceptual Framework and a Focus on Homeworkers in Lourdes Beneria and Neema Kudva (eds.) Proceedings of the Conference on Labor Market Informalization Precarious Jobs and Social Protection Ithaca NY: Cornell University E-Publishing
  5. Cohen Philip N Bianchi Suzanne M 1999 Marriage, Children, and Women's Employment: What Do We Know? Monthly Labor Review (December)
  6. Edin Kathryn Lein Laura 1997 Making Ends Meet: How Single Mothers Survive Welfare and Low-Wage Work New York: Russell Sage Press
  7. Ellwood David Bane Mary Jo 1994 Welfare Realities: From Rhetoric to Reform Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press
  8. Grapard Ulla 1999 Methodology in Janice Peterson and Margaret Lewis (eds.) The Elgar Companion to Feminist Economics pp. 544 – 55 Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar
  9. Jennings Ann L 1993 Public or Private? Institutional Economics and Feminism in Marianne A. Ferber and Julie A. Nelson (eds.) Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics Chicago: Chicago University Press
  10. 10.1080/05775132.2002.11034177 · doi:10.1080/05775132.2002.11034177
  11. Nelson Julie A 1993 The Study of Choice or the Study of Provisioning? Gender and the Definition of Economics in Marianne A. Ferber and Julie A. Nelson (eds.) Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics Chicago: Chicago University Press
  12. 10.1086/495541 · doi:10.1086/495541
  13. Novak , Michael . 1987 . Welfare's New Consensus. . The Public Interest , 89 : 20
  14. 10.1177/08861090022093903 · doi:10.1177/08861090022093903
  15. 10.1080/135457099338157 · doi:10.1080/135457099338157
  16. Smith Robert Leo Smith Thomas M 2000 Elements of Ecology 4th edn San Francisco: Addison Wesley Longman Inc
  17. Thomas-Slayter Barbara 2003 Southern Exposure West Hartford CT: Kumarian Press
  18. Veblen Thorstein 1967 The Theory of the Leisure Class New York: Penguin Books
  19. Wangari Esther Thomas-Slayter Barbara Rocheleau Dianne 1996 Gendered Visions for Survival: Semi-Arid Regions in Kenya in Dianne Rocheleau Barbara Thomas-Slayter and Esther Wangari (eds.) Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experiences pp. 127 – 54 London: Routledge
  20. Waring Marilyn 1999 Counting for Nothing: What Men Value and What Women Are Worth 2nd edn Toronto: University of Toronto Press

Cited by

See all 417

Metadata

Authors
Power, M.
Venue
Feminist Economics
Published
2004-11
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
3-19
ISSN
  • 1354-5701 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4372
OpenAlex
W2130746815
Cited by
417
References
33
FWCI
12.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Provisioning as a Starting Point for Feminist Economics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1354570042000267608
The paper
Power, M. (2004). Social Provisioning as a Starting Point for Feminist Economics. Feminist Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570042000267608

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.