The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
''Bargaining'' and Gender Relations: Within and Beyond the Household
Open accessAbstract
Highlighting the problems posed by a ''unitary'' conceptualization of the household, a number of economists have in recent years proposed alternative models. These models, especially those embodying the bargaining approach, provide a useful framework for analyzing gender relations and throwing some light on how gender asymmetries are constructed and contested. At the same time, the models have paid inadequate or no attention to some critical aspects of intra-household gender dynamics, such as: What factors (especially qualitative ones) affect bargaining power? What is the role of social norms and social perceptions in the bargaining process and how might these factors themselves be bargained over? Are women less motivated than men by self-interest and might this affect bargaining outcomes? Most discussions on bargaining also say little about gender relations beyond the household, and about the links between extra-household and intra-household bargaining power. This paper spells out the nature of these complexities and their importance in determining the outcomes of intra-household dynamics. It also extends the bargaining approach beyond the household to the interlinked arenas of the market, the community and the State.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Becker, G. S. (1991) · doi:10.4159/9780674020665 · Cited by 10,565
Cited by
Agarwal, B. (2001) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(01)00066-3 · Cited by 874
Self-citationThe gender asset gap: What do we know and why does it matter?
Deere, C. D., & Doss, C. R. (2006) · Feminist Economics · doi:10.1080/13545700500508056 · Cited by 594
Cudd, A. E. (2006) · doi:10.1093/0195187431.001.0001 · Cited by 483
Conceptualising environmental collective action: why gender matters
Agarwal, B. (2000) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/cje/24.3.283 · Cited by 365
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Agarwal, B.
- Venue
- Feminist Economics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-51
- ISSN
- 1354-5701 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4372
- OpenAlex
- W2042005398
- Cited by
- 1,693
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ''Bargaining'' and Gender Relations: Within and Beyond the Household. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/135457097338799
- The paper
- Agarwal, B. (1997). ''Bargaining'' and Gender Relations: Within and Beyond the Household. Feminist Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/135457097338799
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.